T
Thekla
Guest
was part of the WH plan; they don’t deny it either. And I take them at their words as well; all of their words and all that they imply.
“The battle of Iraq is one victory in a war on terror that began on September the 11, 2001 – and still goes on.” (5/03)
But just so we are clear, I’m not the one that brought it up the “Mission Accomplished” banner in the first place…
Stu wrote:
“Beat me to the punch. “Mission Accomplished” referred to USS ABRAHAM LINCOLN finishing a 10 month deployment.”
vern humphrey:
“The battle of Iraq is one victory in a war on terror that began on September the 11, 2001 – and still goes on.” (5/03)
But just so we are clear, I’m not the one that brought it up the “Mission Accomplished” banner in the first place…
Stu wrote:
“Beat me to the punch. “Mission Accomplished” referred to USS ABRAHAM LINCOLN finishing a 10 month deployment.”
vern humphrey:
But it wasn’t an “incident;” something that occured naturally. It was a managed, rehearsed, photo opportunity for propaganda purposes. That’s what politician’s do.You have implied again and again that the sign was part of the White House plan. That it meant the whole mission of all our armed forces was accomplished.
If you deny that, answer this – why even discuss the incident?
The issue is the propgandistic use of the incident, the deliberate casting of it in a false light.