Bible

  • Thread starter Thread starter Luke1_48
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
Peace be with you!
40.png
YAQUBOS:
Did they know the Holy Spirit, and how? Who defines the Holy Trinity?
Psalm45:9:
The Holy Trinity is a mystery, all we know is that it is the Father the Son and the Holy Spirit. Through the graces of God, the church knows that Jesus is God. The council of Nicea condmned Arianism, only the church can determine hereseys, like Sola Scriptura.
The same circular thinking is continuing…

My friend: who says that there is a Holy Trinity?
40.png
YAQUBOS:
How do you know that the apostles in fact said those things?
Psalm45:9:
Becuase the Church Fathers attest to it.
How do you know that what the Church Fathers are saying is true?
40.png
YAQUBOS:
Who says that God in fact told the apostles anything?
Psalm45:9:
The Church Fathers say so.
Who says that what they are saying is true? Are their words the Word of God? If yes, then why don’t you listen to the apostles directly?
40.png
YAQUBOS:
How do you know that the Church Fathers recorded what God says?
Psalm45:9:
Becuase there teachings are the teachings of the apostles, who were taught by Christ himself.
How do you know that their teachings are the teachings of the apostles?
40.png
YAQUBOS:
How did the Holy Spirit tell you that? On what are you basing your faith?
Psalm45:9:
The Gospel of Christ, as it was preached by the Apostles and the Church Fathers.
Are you sure that the fathers preached the Gospel of Christ?
40.png
YAQUBOS:
Who tells you that what HUMANS are telling you today is WORD OF GOD?
Psalm45:9:
Jesus, the Church Fathers attest through faith in what the Apostles taught to them, that whatever the Bishops bind, shall be bound.
Ah, my friend, the Church Fathers are your gods!!! Who tells you that the Church fathers told you the truth???

In Love,
Yaqubos†
 
Peace be with you!
Psalm45:9:
The Terminology was difficult for me to understand. Yes, indeed Divine Revelation has ended, the terminology was confusing to me.

Thank you for showing my mistake. Divine Revelation has ceased, but presenting that Revelation has not. Which is what I was trying to say, but I did not understand the terminology, I do now, thank you very much!
DIVINE REVELATION HAS ENDED!!! Amen!

So once God finished to say His Word to us, no other person has ever said the Word of God. Christians just preach THAT Word, without adding anything to it.

So the words of the fathers are NOT Word of God. They are just preaching that SAME Word of God AS THEY UNDERSTAND IT.

So, my friend, let’s say when has the Revelation ended?

In Love,
Yaqubos†
 
Peace be with you!
Psalm45:9:
Martyr:


  1. *]One who chooses to suffer death rather than renounce religious principles.
    *]**One who makes great sacrifices or suffers much in order to further a belief, cause, or principle. **

    1. *]One who endures great suffering: a martyr to arthritis.
      *]One who makes a great show of suffering in order to arouse sympathy.

      http://dictionary.reference.com/search?q=Martyr

      A person does not have to shed blood to be a martyr.

    1. At the minimum, one has to do those sacrifices FOR THE TRUTH…

      In Love,
      Yaqubos†
 
Peace be with you!
40.png
YAQUBOS:
*Peace be with you!

But the Church didn’t exist in that time to do anything! Didn’t anyone believe in what Jesus said as WORD OF GOD, until the council of Rome?

In Love,
Yaqubos†*
Psalm45:9:
Yes, the Church Fathers!
Didn’t anyone believe in what Jesus said as WORD OF GOD, until the Fathers you know believed in it???

By the way: if the Church fathers didn’t believe in those words of Jesus, would they cease to be WORD OF GOD?

In Love,
Yaqubos†
 
Peace be with you!
40.png
YAQUBOS:
By the way: did the Christian Church exist as CHRISTIAN CHURCH before Pentecost and the Baptism of the Spirit?
Psalm45:9:
Well St. John the Baptist recieved the Spirit before his birth, St. Mary and St. Elizabeth recieved the Spirit also before Pentecost. This is bapstim of desire. On the evening of Easter Sunday, Christ breathed the Spirit upon his apostles. On Pentecost, the Spirit descended upon the rest of the communion of faith. And So the communion of Faith had been around for awhile. On Pentecost it expanded.
Well, this is another heresy like that you declared before, talking about the Revelation of God.
  1. There is no such a thing as Baptism of the Spirit of desire.
  2. Mary, the Mother of the Lord, was also present in the day of Pentecost, and she was baptized of the Spirit.
  3. Even after our Lord breathed upon the apostles, He told them to wait in Jerusalem for the Promise.
40.png
YAQUBOS:
How do you know THIS is what the apostles told them?
Psalm45:9:
The Church Fathers told the next generation this. We still have the Fathers’ writings today to attest to what the apostles preached.
  1. Who tells you that only THESE are the Church fathers writings? Who puts a canon for the writings of the fathers?
  2. We still have the writings of the apostles to attest to what they preached!!
In Love,
Yaqubos†
 
Pax Vobiscvm!
40.png
YAQUBOS:
The same circular thinking is continuing…
Yup! The early Christans had no Bible.
40.png
YAQUBOS:
My friend: who says that there is a Holy Trinity?
The Bible does not say there is a Trinity, but Jesus did tell the Apostles to Baptize in name of the Father, the Son, and the Holy Spirit. That’s three; a trinity, and it came straight from the mouth of God, as the Church Fathers attest from what the Apostles told them. Which the Church Fathers formally declared to condemn Aryanism at the Council of Nicea.
40.png
YAQUBOS:
How do you know that what the Church Fathers are saying is true?
It’s faith in the Gospel of Christ that was preached from the mouths of the Apostles. For the Apostles told the Church Fathers that Christ gave his Bishops authority to bind and loose things. It is faith in the Words of my Lord and Savior Jesus Christ.
40.png
YAQUBOS:
Who says that what they are saying is true? Are their words the Word of God? If yes, then why don’t you listen to the apostles directly?
I read the epistles of the Apostles; next I read the writings of the church fathers that were taught by the Apostles themselves. Only then do I truly understand what Christ and his Apostles were teaching. I do listen to the Apostles.
40.png
YAQUBOS:
How do you know that their teachings are the teachings of the apostles?
I look at John chapter 6. Catholics and Orthodox Christians have the same interpretation, Protestants do not. Which interpretation is correct? I then read the writings of the church fathers that were taught by the apostles themselves. What do you know; they all believe in the same things that Catholics and Orthodox Christians do today. I resolve that that is the interpretation of the scriptures, for that is how the apostles interpreted the Words of Christ, and that is what they taught the Church Fathers. Christ told Peter that nothing would prevail against his church, it’s faith in the Gospel.
40.png
YAQUBOS:
Are you sure that the fathers preached the Gospel of Christ?
Yes, they were taught by the men who were taught by Christ himself, how do you know that the New Testament is the Gospel of Christ?
40.png
YAQUBOS:
Ah, my friend, the Church Fathers are your gods!!! Who tells you that the Church fathers told you the truth???
Ahmyfriend**, theBibleisyourGod. Nowdoesn’tthatsoundridiculous? Christsaidsohimself, astheapostlepreachedittotheFathers, astheypreachedithimself. St. Paulsaidsotoo: “**ButifI tarry long, that thou mayest know how thou oughtest to behave thyself in the house of God, which is the church of the living God, the pillar and ground of the truth.” (1 Timothy 3:15)
 
40.png
YAQUBOS:
DIVINE REVELATION HAS ENDED!!! Amen!

So once God finished to say His Word to us, no other person has ever said the Word of God. Christians just preach THAT Word, without adding anything to it.
Amen to that! We still preach God’s Word, not adding anything to it from the Word that the Apostles first gave us from their mouths, which came from the mouth of Christ himself! For not everything that Christ and his Apostles taught were written down.
40.png
YAQUBOS:
So the words of the fathers are NOT Word of God.
1+1=2; Jesus=God; Jesus’ teachings=Word of God; Apostles preach to Church Fathers what Christ taught Apostles=what Apostles preach to Church Fathers is the Word of God; Church Fathers preach what Apostle taught them=What Church Fathers preach is Word of God.
40.png
YAQUBOS:
They are just preaching that SAME Word of God AS THEY UNDERSTAND IT.

So, my friend, let’s say when has the Revelation ended?
Can you please provide a scripture passages saying that Divine Revelation has ended?
 
40.png
YAQUBOS:
Peace be with you!

At the minimum, one has to do those sacrifices FOR THE TRUTH…

In Love,
Yaqubos†
Pax Vobiscvm!

“But if I tarry long, that thou mayest know how thou oughtest to behave thyself in the house of God, which is the church of the living God, the pillar and ground of the truth.” (1 Timothy 3:15)

I couldn’t agree more with you!
 
40.png
YAQUBOS:
Well, this is another heresy like that you declared before, talking about the Revelation of God.
  1. There is no such a thing as Baptism of the Spirit of desire.
  2. Mary, the Mother of the Lord, was also present in the day of Pentecost, and she was baptized of the Spirit.
  3. Even after our Lord breathed upon the apostles, He told them to wait in Jerusalem for the Promise.
‘“Since Christ died for all, and since all men are in fact called to one and the same destiny, which is divine, we must hold that the Holy Spirit offers to all the possibility of being made partakers, in a way known to God, of the Paschal mystery.” Every man who is ignorant of the Gospel of Christ and of his Church, but seeks the truth and does the will of God in accordance with his understanding of it, can be saved. It may be supposed that such persons would have desired Baptism explicitly if they had known its necessity.’ (CCC section 2, article one, 1260)

'Cyprian of Carthage

“[T]he baptism of public witness and of blood cannot profit a heretic unto salvation, because there is no salvation outside the Church.” (Letters 72[73]:21 [A.D. 253]).

“[Catechumens who suffer martyrdom] are not deprived of the sacrament of baptism. Rather, they are baptized with the most glorious and greatest baptism of blood, concerning which the Lord said that he had another baptism with which he himself was to be baptized [Luke 12:50]” (ibid., 72[73]:22).

Cyril of Jerusalem

“If any man does not receive baptism, he does not have salvation. The only exception is the martyrs, who even without water will receive the kingdom.
. . . For the Savior calls martyrdom a baptism, saying, ‘Can you drink the cup which I drink and be baptized with the baptism with which I am to be baptized [Mark 10:38]?’ Indeed, the martyrs too confess, by being made a spectacle to the world, both to angels and to men [1 Cor. 4:9]” (*Catechetical Lectures *3:10 [A.D. 350]).’

catholic.com/library/Necessity_of_Baptism.asp

St. John the Baptist was a martyr of blood, St. Mary recieved a different Martyrdom while standing at the foot of the Cross on Calvary.
40.png
YAQUBOS:
  1. Who tells you that only THESE are the Church fathers writings? Who puts a canon for the writings of the fathers?
The infalliable church tells me these things. Who puts a canon for the writings in your Bible?
YAQBUOS:
  1. We still have the writings of the apostles to attest to what they preached!!
We still have the writing of the Church Fathers, who also attest to what the Apostle preached, in order to interpret the Writings of the Apostles, in full accordance to St. Peter’s admonishment, which is scripture!!!
 
Psalm 45:9

I have just read some more of this thread and I wanted to tell you how unfortunate it is that YAQUBOS said that the “Fathers are your gods.” This does not represent the concensus among evangelicals at all. I would never make such a claim and I am sorry that it was made. Although I disagree strongly with you concerning Tradition, I don’t think that the tone that YAQUBOS has taken is edifying to this conversation, and I respect what you bring to the table doing theology. Just wanted to say that (not that you were losing any sleep over it 😉 ).

Michael
 
Hi Yaqubos,

Glad to see that you’re still posting.

I would like to ask you two questions without posting what you originally said because I don’t have the time to go back and look for them.

1 - Who told you that divine revelation has ended?
2 - Who told you that Montanism is a heresy?

I do believe that Montanism is a heresy and that divine revelation has ended as far as Sacred Scripture is concerned. I just want to know who told you that it is a heresy. Are you able to answer these questions without asking me any questions first? I would very much appreciate hearing your answer.

Grace and peace to you,
Gene C.
 
40.png
YAQUBOS:
I read this question. It is really interesting.
Peace be with you.

Everyone,
Please be aware that Yaqubos will attempt to sidestep any questions because he has does not have the answers to our questions. I have attempted to have a coherent dialog with him before, but have not be able to get one single answer from him.

Let us go now to love and serve the Lord.
 
40.png
RBushlow:
Peace be with you.

Everyone,
Please be aware that Yaqubos will attempt to sidestep any questions because he has does not have the answers to our questions. I have attempted to have a coherent dialog with him before, but have not be able to get one single answer from him.

Let us go now to love and serve the Lord.
Word my Bro! I’ve noticed that too. TR()||**** alert! At least that’s what his posting pattern has been like. I mean it’s not like I’m going on many different French and Middle Eastern chat forums, being a **TR()||**and picking fights with other people and then saying, PAIX à vous! Jésus sauve! Bénédictions! Something like that…
 
40.png
michaelp:
Oh, now I am a 2. Sorry, had to do it. What does spurious mean? That is kinda ad hoc isn’t it. I am certianly open to the inclusion of these books. Honestly. But just saying they are spurious does not help me. I honestly struggle with these issues. This is the evidence I have found and, from an unbiased perspective (I do try), their exclusion seems valid. What am I missing . . . really. You will be surprised. If you give me a good argument, I really will change. I am not bound by my traditions to such a degree that I cannot.
Hey-

Sorry to cut in so late with this comment. Your inability to determine canon through a purely intellectual approach of history is the problem. Is it not obvious that no one could ever, using intellect alone, determine what was canon from the very beginning? think about it. Does it make sense that God would leave us in this mess? I don’t think so.
 
Yaqubos…

Grrrrrr… Like Mrs. Mean Lady!!! :mad:

AKU RYO TAI SAN!!!

(Throws prayer parchment at his Yaqubos’ forehead)

THE POWER OF CHRIST COMPELS YOU!!!

(Throws holy water)
 
40.png
YAQUBOS:
Peace be with you!

Who told those Bishops that Jesus is God?

Who says that Jesus in fact turned and told the apostles those things?

Why don’t you take the right way and believe what God says, instead of believing what some humans around you tell you about what the apostles said?

How do you know that what some people are telling you today are the words of the apostles?

How do you know that those apostles are in fact apostles?

If it’s called faith, it must be built on what God says, and not on what humans say.

Are you admitting here that you are a montanist?

Oh, friend, who said that Jesus told anyone anything?

Did anyone know about Jesus before Jesus came and told them?

In Love,
Yaqubos†
You seem to ask many questions and only rarely issue statements and I am beginning to see why. Please see your statement bolded above. I disagree with it. Would it be faith if it was “built” on what “God said” through a human? You seem to be assuming that God CANNOT speak through humans. Where did you get this idea?

As an aside, I’ve read this entire thread today for the first time and you have not coherently articulated a single point. Why don’t you try and answer a few questions that you are asked and also CORRECT any erroneous statements that others make by identifying the error contained in their comments and STATING the truth as you know it. This is commonly known as exchanging ideas. Exchanging questions is silly.

Loving you in my imperfect way -

Philthy
 
Peace be with you!
Psalm45:9:
Can you please provide a scripture passages saying that Divine Revelation has ended?
It is not me who must give a passage. You said that the Revelation has ended, and you said that you were wrong when you said that the Revelation didn’t end. So you need to prove what you claim.

Don’t forget that this thread is questioning the Authority of the Bible.

In Love,
Yaqubos†
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top