R
Ridgerunner
Guest
Evangelicals don’t hesitate to vote according to their religious beliefs or act contrary to them when in office. Neither should Catholics.
They endorsed Carter.Who are they gonna vote for, a Democrat?![]()
Right. Reagan, Romney, and Trump switched positions to get Evangelical endorsements.lot has changed in forty some yeats
I’d prefer to stay on the subject of this thread.Really? You’re not going to chase that rabbit? Why ever not?
Catholics in office should not hesitate to act contrary to their beliefs? News to me.Evangelicals don’t hesitate to vote according to their religious beliefs or act contrary to them when in office. Neither should Catholics.
And look at him now!
Why all this interest in the slave owning ancestors of Kamala Harris? Many African Americans probably have some slave owning ancestors. According to a study in the American Journal of Human Genetics, the average African American has 24% white European ancestry. I’m sure that a lot of those white ancestors of European descent were slave owners.Should Kamala Harris pay reparations? - The Spectator World
Should her father, whose ancestors also owned slaves, be taxed based on his degree of descent from slave-owners?
'Cause they’re going to have to pay reparations to themselves!1cthlctrth:![]()
Why all this interest in the slave owning ancestors of Kamala Harris? Many African Americans probably have some slave owning ancestors. According to a study in the American Journal of Human Genetics, the average African American has 24% white European ancestry. I’m sure that a lot of those white ancestors of European descent were slave owners.Should Kamala Harris pay reparations? - The Spectator World
Should her father, whose ancestors also owned slaves, be taxed based on his degree of descent from slave-owners?
But most African Americans are probably descendants of both slaves and slave owners. It’s well known that many slave owners slept with their slaves. That’s where many African Americans get that 24% white ancestry. Even Martin Luther King, Jr. almost certainly had ancestors who were slave owners.It wouldn’t be a big deal if there wasn’t such a big push to have a “slave descendent” as a president/VP. As such, being a descendent of the opposite end of the spectrum should be fair game to criticize.
Perhaps, but I’m sure that the white descendants of slave owners did much better in life than their African American descendants.Thorolfr:![]()
Correct, which is why the whole concept of ancestry tests is very silly. Since that is the case, though, it is equally silly to choose a VP simply because she has a certain skin color.But most African Americans are probably descendants of both slaves and slave owners. It’s well known that many slave owners slept with their slaves.
The choice of VP has to do with whether that person will help the ticket win the election. If picking a woman of color will help turn out more women and more people of color on election day to vote for your ticket, then it seems like a wise thing to do.Thorolfr:![]()
Sure but what does that have to do with the choice of president or VP? I’m sure kids in the math club had a harder childhood than the MBAs, but probably the latter would make better lawmakers.Perhaps, but I’m sure that the white descendants of slave owners did much better in life than their African American descendants.