A
az_4_faith
Guest
Seventy + some posts and the info contained within them.My (our) bishop is my neighbour (and a very nice man).
What makes you think that it is a serious problem?
Seventy + some posts and the info contained within them.My (our) bishop is my neighbour (and a very nice man).
What makes you think that it is a serious problem?
It is, although on the other hand, it stresses me quite a lot because I keep tabs on when he comes and goes. I live on my own and am not too well emotionally. I tend to get paranoid imaging where he goes to. Sometimes, he away for days at a time. I used to think that he and his assistence priests were spying on me but my health worker tells me otherwise. I wish that they’d all leave me alone.That has to be so cool living next door to the Bishop.
and i would say to those who can give a lot away AND buy expensive things that they should buy less expensive things and give MORE away. i believe that God will ask us why we had spare change jars and extra coats when our brothers and sisters had nothing. if everyone on earth was completely provided for, then, by all mean, live as comfortably as you like. until then though, wasting money is against what God has called us to.See - perhaps you are not able to do both with your disposable money but there are an amazing number of people in the world that can do both - meaning have an expensive car if the prefer AND donate beyond your wildest dreams.
The problem is…you appear to be judging folks based on your experience but not on reality of what is going on in their world. Your perception does not equal reality in all cases.
Just as the OP cannot possibly know how the Bishop came to have a nice car.
To those given much, much is required. There are people out in the world that do give in excess.
something the apostles and early church leaders spoke out against! are you saying that priests and bishops are today’s pharisees?? i might be a protestant but i certainly don’t want to lump all priests, bishops, ministers into that category.True, neither Jesus nor the apostles lived in luxury.
True, one should strive to live modestly.
But the point that might be given is that the bishops today function in an established Church–the Church was not established at the time of the apostles, any more than the Jewish religion was ‘established’ at the time of the patriarchs. Yet no one questions that the high priest of the Jews as Judaism became an established religion, in his function as high priest, was entitled to wear the beautiful vestments and to wield political influence, etc.
Obviously the statement made “would Jesus wear a Rolex watch,” went over your head.Huh??? What’s this business about our Lord wearing an expensive timepiece?! Who knows the specifics of what he wore?
In our Lord’s time, NOBODY wore a Rolex (Pontius Pilate may have had a Movado).
We, in the U.S. today, are magnificently wealthy in ways not imaginable in Biblical times. Did even the prophets foresee plumbing and electricity in almost every home?
The gap between the rich and the poor in most major U.S. cities (leaving aside the homeless) is small compared to what most of us have by contrast to what was available in 30 A.D.
Some bishops have fancy cars and I can turn a spigot and have a hot shower or sudsy bath every day. All of it would appear wildly luxurious to Simon Peter or Mary Magdalene. Those poor folks didn’t even have color TV and the internet yet!
Please Lord, just give us bishops who are prayerful, wise, virtuous, courageous, orthodox, and available as spiritual fathers to the people of their diocese. If the bishop is a holy and effective shepherd of souls and a wise administrator (not hiding behind his lawyers and staff), I’d be delighted to see him decked out in the highest fashion riding in a gold-plated Rolls-Royce! If he had all his priests preach every Sunday from the new Roman Catechism, and once a month from papal encyclicals on abortion and birth control, he should be given a platinum miter encrusted with emeralds and diamonds. He would then suffer the REAL POVERTY of public scorn in these immoral and impious times for daring to teach the true faith.
Not at all! I just attempted to put your comment into a broader context. I have lived on the streets myself with only the goods I was able to carry. Even so, I do not comprehend the tendency many have to attack those who have earned or been blessed with more goods than others. I believe that a culture of envy has replaced a genuine appreciation for the spirit of poverty. Criticism of the Bishops for having nice cars only makes sense when the critic is a Poor Clare nun, or a monk in a Maronite rite penitential community (maybe some other religious communities are comparably ascetic, but the Maronite rite monks and Poor Clares are the two best examples I could think of).Obviously the statement made “would Jesus wear a Rolex watch,” went over your head.
Jim
Having a nice car really isn’t he issue. It’s having luxurious cars and homes that the average parishioner in their diocese, couldn’t dream of.Not at all! I just attempted to put your comment into a broader context. I have lived on the streets myself with only the goods I was able to carry. Even so, I do not comprehend the tendency many have to attack those who have earned or been blessed with more goods than others. I believe that a culture of envy has replaced a genuine appreciation for the spirit of poverty. Criticism of the Bishops for having nice cars only makes sense when the critic is a Poor Clare nun, or a monk in a Maronite rite penitential community (maybe some other religious communities are comparably ascetic, but the Maronite rite monks and Poor Clares are the two best examples I could think of).
How do we know that a vehicle for the Bishop isn’t donated by a Catholic who owns a car dealership?I went to Friday prayer meeting today and the discussion was about our Bishops and their cars. The question that was raised: Why does our Bishop (and mostly all Bishops) drive a top of the range executive saloon car instead of a basic model? (He usually gets a new model every three years).
Both sides greed that having a new car every three years was acceptable, in that, the car would reasonably be expected not to break down and thus avoid the Bishop missing any of his engagements.
However, each side disagreed upon the choice of model i.e. expensive luxurious model v basic model. One side argued that you couldn’t expect the Bishop to turn up for engagements in a basic model because that it would look inappropriate for his office/post.
The other side argued that (on Palm Sunday) when Jesus rode into Jerusalem, He did so on the back of a colt at His request. He didn’t request to be carried upon a throne (Mark 11:1-11). Jesus might also have thought of which was appropriate? :ehh:
In some cases the vehilces are donated, but not all.How do we know that a vehicle for the Bishop isn’t donated by a Catholic who owns a car dealership?
Personally, I would rather the Bishop have a reliable vehicle with a good warranty than a personal jet.
Well I’m glad to see that someone suggested that the cars might be leased. I do NOT know about our bishop. I don’t know if the bishop owns or lease.Here’s another thought-I don’t know about the U.K. but here in the U.S. a lot of people lease their cars and thus ‘get another one’ every 3 years. I wonder if the gabmeisters considered that?
Bishops who choose to live the high life in luxury do so at the cost of scandalising the Church. That is where the argument finishes.Then for all of you who would denounce a Bishop who merely lives according to the rights his most holy office allows him, please go and evict the Holy Father from the Apostolic Palace, the Lateran Palace, Castel Gandalfo, and the numerous other Papal residences. Please tell the Vicar of Christ that to have Palaces and servants and guards and a massive personal library is a grave evil, and then direct him to a cardboard box.
I think you mean “pawn”… at least I hope you mean “pawn”.Bishops who choose to live the high life in luxury do so at the cost of scandalising the Church. That is where the argument finishes.
And as for your attempt to use the Holy Father as a mere porn in getting your message across - it didn’t work. Pope Alexander VI is the Church’s paradigm as a warning from history against any Papal debauchery.
Oh how embarrassing I’ve gone red as a beetroot :blushing: LOLI think you mean “pawn”… at least I hope you mean “pawn”.
It was a good laugh!!
Only if they put their wealth above their duties to the Church.Bishops who choose to live the high life in luxury do so at the cost of scandalising the Church. That is where the argument finishes.
I assume you mean pawn…And as for your attempt to use the Holy Father as a mere porn in getting your message across - it didn’t work. Pope Alexander VI is the Church’s paradigm as a warning from history against any Papal debauchery.
No objections to that! The aeroplane is essential to his work. There is a big difference though to bishops who choose to drive swanky cars instead of excellently reliable basic models. (Unless, they want the luxury cars to be in line with their lavish life-styles? That isn’t what Christianity is about. But I guess some people will never understand that, i.e. they’ll never hear us.Archbishop Schweitz of Anchorage has a vehicle worth over $100,000… his airplane.
Why? because he has to travel to all parishes in the Archdiocese’s episocopal see, and often throughout the province (which includes the dioceses of Juneau and Fairbanks.