And you say you’re a Catholic. Go ahead, vote for the abortion-rights guy again, Carlan.
:banghead::hypno:This should be good news for those who oppose all federal income taxes; we’re halfway there.
Snarky…Well, you would say that, someone once told me it is the way you make your living! That is, trying to figure out how millionares can get away with not contributing much and I’ll say others also , while the middle class carry the burden.
Sounds kind of Marxist to me
excuse me, we are not discussing abortion rights, but as most here know already I am a Dem for pro life and you do not know for whom I will vote or if I will vote at all. However, in this country you may surmise all you like. Peace, CarlanAnd you say you’re a Catholic. Go ahead, vote for the abortion-rights guy again, Carlan.
Oh phooey, you can laugh at what this oldie says, but it is the truth.
rLg, you always have had this whole class warfare idea twisted imo. The warfare is coming from the top down. It’s the top class firing the bullets at the middle class and the poor while corporations make such profits and the rich who are the ones who can most afford to pay more dollars in taxes, want to keep their benefits of tax cuts and now I hear talk of further tax break benefits for the rich. We’re never going to even start digging ourselves even somewhat out of the hole in that case unless you want to severely hurt the poor and middle classes in the process.
This should be good news for those who oppose all federal income taxes; we’re halfway there.
Carlan, I just heard that too! We must be watching the same facts.
I thought Joe was right on with that one. I’m looking forward to him taking on Ryan.Will do.
The facts dont bear up your claims. And when repeatedly confronted with the facts you ignore them. The so called rich already pay 88% of all federal income taxes. A tax system that exempts 48% from paying taxes can in no way be described as tilted towards the rich.rLg, you always have had this whole class warfare idea twisted imo. The warfare is coming from the top down. It’s the top class firing the bullets at the middle class and the poor while corporations make such profits and the rich who are the ones who can most afford to pay more dollars in taxes, want to keep their benefits of tax cuts and now I hear talk of further tax break benefits for the rich. We’re never going to even start digging ourselves even somewhat out of the hole in that case unless you want to severely hurt the poor and middle classes in the process.
But bankruptcy would have negatively effected the UAW so Obama could not allow that. And what most people dont get is the damage the bailout did to the system of financing in this country. For the first time in History bond holder and preferred stock claims were subordinated to other creditors. Meanwhile GM is still distressed, still owes us billions and the day of reckoning for the UAW has only been delayed.Will do.
GM would still be alive, if they had declared bankruptcy and reorganized (some say they would have even better). And, while I’m happy Osama was taken out, it is not a big enough deal for me to ignore all of his failed policies, increase in debt and anti-life stances. But, then, I realize those aren’t important to “pro-life” Democrats. It is sufficient just to claim to be pro-life, as you vote for the most pro-choice, pro-gay marriage, anti-religious freedom candidate you can find…
Will do.
GM would still be alive, if they had declared bankruptcy and reorganized (some say they would have even better).
(1)Really,
(2)Surely it can’t compare with debt Mr Bush ran up.
(3)Yes, I do so hate that,and i continue to pray for pro choice people including the ones in the Republican party.
By the way,you do not know for whom I vote or that indeed I do vote! Peace, Carlan
(1)Really,
(2)Surely it can’t compare with debt Mr Bush ran up.
(3)Yes, I do so hate that,and i continue to pray for pro choice people including the ones in the Republican party.
By the way,you do not know for whom I vote or that indeed I do vote! Peace, Carlan
That’s because you misconstrue the facts as a Catholic Republican to fit your personal agenda. I’m not talking about percentages. I’m talking about who has the most real disposable dollars to be able to afford more taxes. Instead of cutting tax percentage rates for the rich while asking the poor and middle class to take the brunt of the sacrifice. The rich can very much afford to pay more without them having it affect their lifestyles to any measurable degree. And they’re certainly not going to have to worry whether they’re going to have to choose between food for their children or medication for themselves as just one example. I want no part of it.
Can you see the hypocrisy inherent in that statement?
