Catholics and Immigration

  • Thread starter Thread starter meeshy
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
I dissagree to answer Q#1 Yes will be falsely interpreted as the civil laws being without authority, while answering Q#1 No will be falsely interpreted as admission of comitting an immoral action. Neither is correct so yes the question has a double stigma
Nice dodge, but the question addresses the morality of the act, not it’s legality.
Morals do not change, there is no perfect wage. Some walk away from jobs paying over $100,000 while others work for free, low wages, or unsecured wages. Minimum wage does not apply to all jobs all people.
Are you saying it’s impossible to hire someone in the United States?

That no employer knows what wage to offer – and hence no one has a job? 😃
Maybe a lot of waste is running from the actual answers?
Exactly – you’ve been running from the actual answers to three simple questions for a dozen posts now.😛
 
Texas, don’t give credence to anyone who says you don’t answer properly or you haven’t answered the moral question, etc., etc.

These are just word games intended to irritate, nothing more. I’ve been through it, too. Very annoying.

Peace,
Meeshy
 
but the US has no obligation no matter how noble the goal to allow unrestricted access to our public services by illegal non-residents
What public services?

We offer no public services to illegal immigrants save one: emergency room care. That is it. The fact that this is a costly service and the only access for undocumented workers to healthcare (and also for quite a few poor citizens as well) says more about our healthcare system than it does anything else.

Illegal immigrants cannot gain access to TANF benefits, what little benefits TANF offers. They cannot gain access to Medicare, Medicaid, or Disability. The rate of fraud (according to the HHS the fraud and error rate was 6.8% in FY 2000) of each of those disbursements is relatively low and of that fraud, the percentage committed by undocumented workers is likely to be remarkably low.

Undocumented workers cannot even be passengers aboard an airplane.

These stereotypes of illegal immigrants as ruthless criminals or leeches off of society are based upon faulty logic.

No offense, but the Heritage Foundation is not a good place to gain respectable information, unless you simply wish to present a biased view.
 
Texas, don’t give credence to anyone who says you don’t answer properly or you haven’t answered the moral question, etc., etc.

These are just word games intended to irritate, nothing more. I’ve been through it, too. Very annoying.

Peace,
Meeshy
This unanswerred question(s) was to you. Yes or No.
Can you agree on:
=illegal immigrant= economic refugee because anything else is clearly criminal and should not be covered by any new legislation- hence no change is needed to the current law. Would you enforce a expanded guest worker program by hiring only legal guest workers and turning away the newly undocumented, or would you continue to hold to your growing conviction and defy the law and the USCCB?
This further question(s) was to Texas. He sidestepped your question by insinuating there is no need to be labled as illegal or undocumented.
It is totally relevant to the current issue as well as the future issue. If new procedures are put in place to raise the guest worker limit; do you think that will alleviate the needs of the poor in those countries now that desire to escape their poverty? Is the total burden placed on the US alone? Doesn’t Mexico and Guatemala (largely Catholic) have an obligation to change their political way of life instead of trying to change America’s? There are simply not enough jobs, public services, or housing to accommodate the world’s poor in the US.
If one million people are permitted to cross the border legally looking for work, but another million enter illegally along with them, would you or would you not make a distinction between them? If you do not, then you perpetuate the shadow society which carries many ills of its own which the USCCB and common decency opposes, and the problem continues unabated. If you do, then you are acting contrary to the current laws as well as the future laws proposed.
 
What public services?
What about public education?
Clearing the roadways of snow?
The use of public roadways?
Jails and prisons to protect the general public from criminals?
Public utilities: power, water…?
Police, Fire, and Rescue services?

There are many public services that are publicly funded and resource limited.
We offer no public services to illegal immigrants save one: emergency room care. That is it. The fact that this is a costly service and the only access for undocumented workers to healthcare (and also for quite a few poor citizens as well) says more about our healthcare system than it does anything else.
I am not suggesting anyone be turned away at the hospital or at the elementary school, but the border. I am not suggesting the Fire or Police Departments first check for citizenship before helping anyone, but that citizenship and legality be required to be here in the first place. Due to the number of illegals in prison, new prisons are required and new prisons are tax payer funded.
Illegal immigrants cannot gain access to TANF benefits, what little benefits TANF offers. They cannot gain access to Medicare, Medicaid, or Disability. The rate of fraud (according to the HHS the fraud and error rate was 6.8% in FY 2000) of each of those disbursements is relatively low and of that fraud, the percentage committed by undocumented workers is likely to be remarkably low.
Undocumented workers cannot even be passengers aboard an airplane.
With a valid ID (US drivers liscense) gained by false supporting documents, many do just that. This is how they buy vehicles, rent/buy housing, and travel. In most cases, they are not who they say they are and that is a security problem.
These stereotypes of illegal immigrants as ruthless criminals or leeches off of society are based upon faulty logic.
No offense, but the Heritage Foundation is not a good place to gain respectable information, unless you simply wish to present a biased view.
Never said all undocumetned foreign nationals are ruthless criminals, but the sad fact is all undocumented foreign nationals have broken the law and thus are criminals. Excusing them by claiming the current laws are unjust us faulty logic.

It isn’t a matter of being a leech to society as much as legal society has a reasonable expectation that the finite public funded resources as those noted above are used for the legal citizens of the nation, and not every human capable of sneaking into the country.

Do I not have the right to know with reasonable assurance that the people living next to me, driving on the highway with me, going to school with my children…are bound by the same requirments of civic duty and responsibility that I am?

Am I wrong to feel that a two-tier justice system is unjust to me and every other legal resident/citizen when a undocumented illegal can just get another false ID and go about his merry way?
 
What public services?

We offer no public services to illegal immigrants save one: emergency room care. That is it. The fact that this is a costly service and the only access for undocumented workers to healthcare (and also for quite a few poor citizens as well) says more about our healthcare system than it does anything else.

Illegal immigrants cannot gain access to TANF benefits, what little benefits TANF offers. They cannot gain access to Medicare, Medicaid, or Disability. The rate of fraud (according to the HHS the fraud and error rate was 6.8% in FY 2000) of each of those disbursements is relatively low and of that fraud, the percentage committed by undocumented workers is likely to be remarkably low.

Undocumented workers cannot even be passengers aboard an airplane.

These stereotypes of illegal immigrants as ruthless criminals or leeches off of society are based upon faulty logic.

No offense, but the Heritage Foundation is not a good place to gain respectable information, unless you simply wish to present a biased view.
Excellent.
 
What about public education?
Clearing the roadways of snow?
The use of public roadways?
Jails and prisons to protect the general public from criminals?
Public utilities: power, water…?
Police, Fire, and Rescue services?

There are many public services that are publicly funded and resource limited.

With a valid ID (US drivers liscense) gained by false supporting documents, many do just that. This is how they buy vehicles, rent/buy housing, and travel. In most cases, they are not who they say they are and that is a security problem.

Do I not have the right to know with reasonable assurance that the people living next to me, driving on the highway with me, going to school with my children…are bound by the same requirments of civic duty and responsibility that I am?
Siiiiiiiiiiiiiiigh.

Public services are often brought to us by illegal workers, Veri, in case you didn’t know. Bridge, road, and sewer construction are jobs which are held by many, many illegals.

Sales taxes, road tolls, and property taxes all go to fund public services. You must admit that everyone in America pays sales tax. You also must admit that a good majority of those living in America pay property tax. And don’t forget about lotteries, as I mentioned in a previous post.

Illegals cannot get valid U.S. driver’s licenses because they must present some form of visa or work permit. Those documents are pretty tough to falsify, and as I have said a thousand times, fake ones cost mucho dinero. You seem to think this type of forgery “service” is available to every illegal immigrant. That’s silly. Of the many illegals I know who drive, no one has a fake license. Not one. It’s just too hard to fake. They drive without licenses. So do many U.S. citizens.

As far as knowing if our neighbors have the same sense of civil duty and responsibility as we do… WHAT!!! You mean to say that because someone is a citizen you automatically believe that they are dutiful, responsible, and law-abiding? WHAT!!! Oh Veri, Veri, Veri… would that it were so…

Peace,
Meeshy
 
There are a lot of folks here that I agree with. Immigration needs to be fixed and fast. However, let me play devil’s advocate for a minute and throw this question out there: Do you think the fact that most people from Mexico are Catholic has anything to do with the US Bishops’ overwhelming support for them? Think about it. If all these people were Buddhist, or some other religion, would these same bishops be working as hard to meet their bodily needs? I would like to think they would. But hey, don’t think I haven’t considered the benefit of suddenly increasing our Church numbers as a whole by the hundred-thousands. Those who are so hostile to these immigrants may want to consider the same thing. I have to go. 😃

Tracy
 
Just wanted to show you this BBC article from 1998 about green cards.

BBC article

In 1998, according to the article, a fake green card cost $15,000.

When the U.S. government implemented the anti-forgery improvements to the cards, I’m sure the cost of buying a fake card increased significantly.

Now, with all of you who say the majority of illegals work for sub-standard wages, how do you suppose they purchase these fake cards?

Answer: they don’t. Fake green cards, fake driver’s licenses, fake passports, and other false documents are used only by a small percentage of illegals in this country. As soon as I have the time to find some government statistics on this matter, I’ll share them with you.

For now I can tell you that in July 2006 the USCIS conducted a fraud investigation on a small percentage of replacement green card applications. Of the 245 cases investigated, it was found that only 1% were fraudulant. A small investigation, granted, but the results are telling. Here is the info: Fraud

Peace,
Meeshy
 
I agree. 😉

Peace,
Meeshy
What hurts me is seeing say we have to support the US Bishops on a position. We are required as Catholics to believe and support the Church on only a few “political” matters - abortion, etc. Immigration, the war, death penalty, etc, we are allowed to have our own opinions even if they contradict the Pope’s. There is nothing dogmatic about the stance on illegal immigrants and what should happen other than they should be treated with respect and not taken advantage of…
 
Perhaps I am missing something but as a Catholic I am confused about what MY response to hiring undocumented/illegal immigrants should be. Various websites and pastorial letters don’t seem to be very clear to me or perhaps I am missing something.

Is it sinful to hire an undocumented/illegal immigrant worker or not?

Should I follow Exodus 23:9 “You shall not oppress an alien; you well know how it feels to be an alien, since you were once aliens yourselves in the land of Egypt.” and help the poor? The beginning of CCC 2241 gives some instuction: “The more prosperous nations are obliged, to the extent they are able, to welcome the foreigner in search of the security and the means of livelihood which he cannot find in his country of origin.”

Or should I follow the second half of CCC 2241: “Political authorities, for the sake of the common good for which they are responsible, may make the exercise of the right to immigrate subject to various juridical conditions, especially with regard to the immigrants’ duties toward their country of adoption.” Should I respect the right of the government to place restrictions on hiring undocumented/illegal immigrant workers?

Is the current immigration law so unjust that I should ignore it (see CCC 2242) ?

In my opinion, there is considerable grey area here which no one has addressed to my satisfaction.
A society, in order to continue, must protect its borders. Not to do so decimates its continuity and eventually ceases being what it was.

Legal immigration is an orderly, portioned out program. If it is no longer adhered to the nation becomes a strange land to its sons and daughters.
 
I cannot in my heart justify these illegal aliens coming into the United States. And it sickens me when our church flyer contains material from the local Archidoece supporting the illegals and asking us to turn to certain politicians because they vote in favor of this illegal aliens.
 
There are a lot of folks here that I agree with. Immigration needs to be fixed and fast. However, let me play devil’s advocate for a minute and throw this question out there: Do you think the fact that most people from Mexico are Catholic has anything to do with the US Bishops’ overwhelming support for them? Think about it. If all these people were Buddhist, or some other religion, would these same bishops be working as hard to meet their bodily needs? I would like to think they would. But hey, don’t think I haven’t considered the benefit of suddenly increasing our Church numbers as a whole by the hundred-thousands. Those who are so hostile to these immigrants may want to consider the same thing. I have to go. 😃

Tracy
The Catholic Bishops will not change their tune, the non Catholic Bishops might. The issue is not skin color, language, etc., the issue is treating your brother as your brother. If a murder is intruding you are allowed to treat him as a murder, you may treat a thief as a thief, etc ect which means the worker should be treated as a worker, the father as a father, the family as a family.
 
Positions on this issue are pretty well entrenched and I suspect very few people change their minds based on the arguments provided here, unless they were ambivalent to begin with. Those of us who oppose illegal immigration would be well advised to spend some effort making sure our politicians both local and national know where we stand on the issue. The one thing you can expect of most politicians is that they will act in what they perceive to be their best interest. We need to demonstrate that’s what is our interest is where their interests also lie.

Ender
 
I cannot in my heart justify these illegal aliens coming into the United States. And it sickens me when our church flyer contains material from the local Archidoece supporting the illegals and asking us to turn to certain politicians because they vote in favor of this illegal aliens.
Maybe you could explain to the Archbishop what Jesus would do. When he understands how Jesus would handle it he’ll understand you. BTW would you explain it to me also.
 
Why is it that when anyone mentions “illegal aliens”, it’s all about Mexians??? I feel that this is racism. This is racism against all hispanics. There are also other people being mistreated and they are Americans from Puerto Rico.

There are more Irish illegal aliens here in America then the Mexicans. There are more illegal aliens who are from all over the world here on expired student visas…yet only we hear about Mexicans. i really can’t believe that I’m living in America and there are people who are racially and religiously persecuted everyday in the United States.

Who really started this? Think about it. I also think that it is horrible to have a wall which costs much money to tax payers and it generates hate and racism. It was a great day when the wall came crashing down in Germany…now we placed a wall.
Very sad.

People are people (legal or illegal aliens) and they should be treated with the respect they deserve.

We do have a work visa and citizen ship already…however, I think the system discrimates againsts certain peoples. Especially those of Catholic religion.
You have to admit that the illegal immigrant protests are waving Mexico flags. That is why mexicans/illegals are synonymous.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top