You mean to tell me that Jesus wouldn’t want someone to vote for Obama so that they can bleat about having “helped the poor” despite the assault on the RCC and the only thing they do is checking the D box every 2-4 years and using the force of corrupt government to take other people’s money to give to others while calling that Christian charity and taking most if not full credit for it?
Sweet!
That’s why he was called the Prince of Darkness. You don’t want to know what he did with other employees wives, but that’s another topic all together, I don’t want to stray from the opFiring AND blacklisting? Interfering with people’s ability to earn their daily bread because of who they support? If that is not a sin, then it should be.
I suppose your boss did “build that” all by himself, so what need of workers, or of qualities such as loyalty and fairness? For all I know, maybe he “built” the workers too, so no problem if he destroys their lives; after all he OWNS their minds and their wills, no…?
With non-partisan Rasmussen showing over 2 years of an average of about 53% of Americans supporting REPEAL, it doesn’t matter what you call it.
Actually, the people of MA seem to like it. If they want 8 figures of their tax money to go and insure 3% of a state of just over 6 million people, well, I suppose it’s their money to waste.
Tell me. Why would a management organization intentionally drive its company into the ground.
That isn’t what he’s doing though. He’s saying that if his taxes go up again, he will have to cut back and lay people off in order to stay in business. The article title is misleading.
Oh okay. I see. I read just a small part of the first paragraph and the title and that’s the idea I got from it. Sorry about that.
Because they are liberals. It is a mental disease.
Great strawman. Since when does the government call taxes charity? From the inception of civilized society and organized religion, the two separate duties have been required: paying taxes and giving to the poor out of one’s own pocket.
When public money is spent for the express purpose of making the recipient richer whether it is Solyndra, McCatskills husband, Waters husband’s bank, ADM, General Electric or free cell phones to welfare cases it is extortion. It is only justice that the coercive power of the state be reserved to public works , like say building and maintaining an efficient killing operation; governments are really good at this; building levies, roads, they do OK at these type of things as well. Not so good at education. Local school boards did really well at this but when the big bugs got into trying to run schools they messed up big time.
One effect that is already known. Make full time employees part time. Limit them to maximum 30 hours work a week with no benefits, no penalty…er… tax.
Every government has its share of poor stewardship - as in giving taxpayer’s money (or tax breaks) to those who don’t need it or don’t use it productively. Corruption and inefficiency whether it be in government or in private enterprise, are phenomena as old as human endeavors and are NO EXCUSE for shirking civic duties.When public money is spent for the express purpose of making the recipient richer whether it is Solyndra, McCatskills husband, Waters husband’s bank, ADM, General Electric or free cell phones to welfare cases it is extortion. It is only justice that the coercive power of the state be reserved to public works , like say building and maintaining an efficient killing operation; governments are really good at this; building levies, roads, they do OK at these type of things as well. Not so good at education. Local school boards did really well at this but when the big bugs got into trying to run schools they messed up big time.
But back to the topic at hand, some clever operators have figured out by making employees part time and limiting them to 30 hours a week they can avoid the penalty….er…. taxes that come with this monstrous health care alleged reform and as a sweetner on the deal, they can eliminate benifits. Way to go Demopublicans……real good for the middle class.
“Got to pass it to know what’s in it.” But ain’t that America something to see…
Will he “have” to lay people off or his attachment to a particilar profit margin causing him to “need” to lay his employees off?
As far as I am aware, any time the masses challenged a governments power to take their money the masses lost. Accepting Robin Hood being fiction, there might have been a Robin of Loxley type character but I don’t know if he had that much of an operation or impact. Regardless, someone putting a gun to your head threating your welfare if you don’t turn over your money is extortion. It is societal suicide to pretend it is patriotic to surrender your money knowing it is going to be squandered. It is still extortion even if it is done, by a political class, whose members are selected, then offered to me to choose between. I really don’t have any say in it.
Simple rules of real economics. Capital seeks its highest return on investment.
There are example of those who put their employees first but I’ll grant you, such is not the majority.
Speaking of straw men…