A
Ammi
Guest
So is this just a technicality that doesnt matter much either?Um…that they don’t believe it’s really Jesus. :woman_shrugging:t2: If that’s the case, they shouldn’t receive the Eucharist.
So is this just a technicality that doesnt matter much either?Um…that they don’t believe it’s really Jesus. :woman_shrugging:t2: If that’s the case, they shouldn’t receive the Eucharist.
I wouldn’t go with either of those choices personally, if you’re going to “continue to show love to the couple” or want them you life.TC3033:
I guess it would be, “This is my daughter’s partner.”How are you going to address or introduce my spouse? As your invalid daughter in-law? The lady my son lives with?
Or boyfriend/girlfriend
Or lover
I don’t think that makes a difference here, TBH. We have two couples in our family who weren’t married in the Church. My MIL does not introduce them as “So and So’ Lover”. It’s SIL and DIL.You arent Catholic.
That’s not what’s going on here, but if it makes you feel better…OKI’m not into role playing and enduldging others in various beliefs.
And in doing so, you may be making a choice that will strain or break the relationship. I think that’s all anyone has been trying to say.It’s an issue that requires to choose the State OR the Church. I choose the Church.
If you arent Catholic, why would it matter if someone else leaves the faith? Also, you have already conveyed that your Catholic family DOESN’T CARE! From that point, they show a lack of faith and charity. This is harmful to the whole Church.I don’t think that makes a difference here, TBH. We have two couples in our family who weren’t married in the Church. My MIL does not introduce them as “So and So’ Lover”. It’s SIL and DIL.
Nothing about invalid marriages makes me feel better. Role playing that the couple are married is pathetic. The State is not greater than the Church. A side must be taken.That’s not what’s going on here, but if it makes you feel better…OK
No, whoever chooses to break the relationship and cast out or censure the other is responsible for making that choice.And in doing so, you may be making a choice that will strain or break the relationship. I think that’s all anyone has been trying to say.
It’s too bad you feel that way.From that point, they show a lack of faith and charity.
I’d probably lay off saying that to the happy couple if you expect the relationship to stay intact.Role playing that the couple are married is pathetic.
Sure… I don’t think anyone has disagreed.No, whoever chooses to break the relationship and cast out or censure the other is responsible for making that choice.
Did I say it was?Not very cool, huh?
That’s why it’s best to not try to figure out what will happen, and playcate psychological games in case the couple is placing conditions of friendship on whether or not they support and celebrate a ceremony which reflects leaving His Eucharist.There’s definitely multiple outcomes for them to consider.
Why do you have to take everything and turn it into something no one said?So is this just a technicality that doesnt matter much either?
I’m not asking you to judge anyone! I’m asking you to recognize and appreciate that a marriage that doesn’t follow the letter of the law can still encompass aspects that are pleasing to God. Letter of the law…spirit of the law. This “higher law” you carry on about is love. Somehow you simply aren’t putting 2 and 2 together…and it’s getting frustrating.I’m just not interested in judging either hypothetical couple.
They shouldnt receive. And I shouldnt support their wedding which reflects their rejection of His Eucharist.Why do you have to take everything and turn it into something no one said? Do you want people who don’t want to be Catholic and don’t believe the Eucharist is truly Jesus committing sacrilege by receiving it? I mean, really. Come on. You, of all people, would be the first person to call someone out on receiving a Holy Eucharist without believing in the True Presence!
I’m not buying this. The wedding reflects a rejection of the heart of the faith. His Eucharist.I’m not asking you to judge anyone! I’m asking you to recognize and appreciate that a marriage that doesn’t follow the letter of the law can still encompass aspects that are pleasing to God. Letter of the law…spirit of the law. This “higher law” you carry on about is love. Somehow you simply aren’t putting 2 and 2 together…and it’s getting frustrating.
Even if they never got invalidly married, they still don’t want to be Catholic, and they still likely don’t believe it’s truly Jesus. Either way they’ve rejected Him and the Church. It’s a stretch to say it’s the wedding that has rejected the Eucharist—it’s the total lifestyle they’ve chosen to lead.They shouldnt receive. And I shouldnt support their wedding which reflects their rejection of His Eucharist.
We’re strictly speaking in terms of marriage. Couple marries outside the Church. They love each other, make sacrifices for each other, and stay faithful to each other. They have children and give them all the love and attention they deserve. They teach their children to serve others.You are telling us that they can be following the Spirit of the law, while rejecting His Eucharist.
That’s a two way street (especially in the eyes of the couple)…just say’n, especially if you actually say some of the things about them as you state you would up thread. It’s getting hard to believe that you can’t see that.the couple is placing conditions of friendship