D
Darryl_B
Guest
My friend, you have obviously had time to think this one chew.
And thatās part of the problem. Iām married to a Brit, where the drinking age for beer is 18. They donāt have the problems with alcohol and kids that we do. In fact, from the small amount I know, most of Europe doesnāt. Itās a cultural thing.I donāt know but, while I think it is fine for people under 21 to drink, I am not eager to see the age lowered. The day it is lowered, a bunch of people are going to go nuts with it and drink stupidly. It would be a busy day at the ER.
Oh, I know. I was mostly laughing because I can remember giving the Baptist kids grief about dancing in the era of Footloose.True. The joke was playing on historical Methodist stereotypes more than anything.
Well itās not like I can get a six-pack of cars for a few dollars. The very expense involved in owning a car is something of an incentive to.drive sensibly.I would suggest banning cars. They are just too dangerous.
Most things donāt look the same as when they were birthed.Laughing because the Methodists are anything but Puritan in the 21st century. Holy smokes.
I agree with this, my question was more around whether they ālovedā beer in the sense of Lutherans, or whether they just found it a necessary evil.Puritans certainly did drink. Beer, being fermented, was far safer to drink than a lot of water.
I would interpret that quote from Pup7ās link as moderate consumption was approved.Increase Mather, a prominent Puritan minister of the period, delivered a sermon in which he described alcohol as being āa good creature of Godā - although the drunkard was āof the devil.ā