S
someperson555
Guest
thats what youre advocating basically.who says we do?
thats what youre advocating basically.who says we do?
Good luck with that. Criminals don’t give a flying flip about the law.im the one who believes that criminals should not have access to dangerous weapons in the first place.
Amen.I didn’t realize an entire class of children was killed before the shooter took his own life. Can we stop arguing about guns long enough to pray for their souls and for their families? And, for the souls of the adults whose lives were taken today, and for their families.
Jesus, Mary, and Joseph, please be with these families as they grieve for their children. All saints in Heaven, intercede for them. And Jesus, please welcome these precious children into Heaven to be with you forever.
Please say at least one decade of the rosary for these victims and their families.
Yes, by definition.Criminals don’t give a flying flip about the law.
Amen.I didn’t realize an entire class of children was killed before the shooter took his own life. Can we stop arguing about guns long enough to pray for their souls and for their families? And, for the souls of the adults whose lives were taken today, and for their families.
Jesus, Mary, and Joseph, please be with these families as they grieve for their children. All saints in Heaven, intercede for them. And Jesus, please welcome these precious children into Heaven to be with you forever.
Please say at least one decade of the rosary for these victims and their families.
We wouldn’t be a society of defenseless victims. We would be a society that doesn’t enable criminal mischief by handing someone as many deadly weapons as they can carry with a wink and nod and without having any idea what they’re going to do with them.A society of defenseless victims is so much better, isn’t it?
Well we need to define the terms first. When liberals say vigilante they normally mean any lawful armed self defense by a civilian.thats what youre advocating basically.
You keep repeating that line and you still haven’t looked up the laws. It is illegal. Period. The fact that criminals break the law is just impossible to comprehend, apparently.We wouldn’t be a society of defenseless victims. We would be a society that doesn’t enable criminal mischief by handing someone as many deadly weapons as they can carry with a wink and nod without having any idea what they’re going to do with it.
What gun stores have you gone to that take winks and nods as currency?We wouldn’t be a society of defenseless victims. We would be a society that doesn’t enable criminal mischief by handing someone as many deadly weapons as they can carry with a wink and nod and without having any idea what they’re going to do with them.
And your choice is apparently to do nothing to strengthen the law and address illegal gun trafficking.You keep repeating that line and you still haven’t looked up the laws. It is illegal. Period.
Would you hand a toddler an open bottle of poison and leave them alone without any oversight?The fact that criminals break the law is just impossible to comprehend, apparently.
It is irrelevant to the discussion but no.Would you hand a toddler an open bottle of poison and leave them alone without any oversight?
Strengthen it how?And your choice is apparently to do nothing to strengthen the law and address illegal gun trafficking.
Would you hand a toddler an open bottle of poison and leave them alone without any oversight?
Its perfectly relevant. And why not? Poison doesn’t kill people; people do.It is irrelevant to the discussion but no.
As I’ve mentioned; require psychological screening in the permit process, introduce legal liability to gun vendors who sell to suspicious or otherwise unqualified individuals, restrict sales of ammunition without demonstration of legitimate purpose, etc.Strengthen it how?
We are talking about adults, not toddlers.Its perfectly relevant. And why not? Poison doesn’t kill people; people do.
We are talking about mentally disturbed adults, who reason much like children, and their ability to purchase guns with ease.We are talking about adults, not toddlers.
In this shooting, it doesn’t appear that this shooter owned any guns. So how would preventing him from buying a gun have prevented this shooting?We are talking about mentally disturbed adults, who reason much like children, and their ability to purchase guns with ease.
LOL, its you conservatives and libertarians who are emotional. libertarians are like a bunch of insolent children who just dont want anyone to tell them what to do. by the way i cant speak for anyone else, but im not a liberal.Liberals, please take some emotion out of your arguments and don’t use terms like “vigilante” and “winks” and “nods” . With strong emotions and weak facts we will never arrive at a solution or truth. God Bless I have to get dinner ready. Good night
As a faithful Catholic, I’d be more than willing to accept more stringent control laws, if Democrats allowed more stringent laws against legal abortion (let’s say, no legal abortions after eight weeks gestation).We are talking about mentally disturbed adults, who reason much like children, and their ability to purchase guns with ease.
Don’t get lost in the minutia.In this shooting, it doesn’t appear that this shooter owned any guns. So how would preventing him from buying a gun have prevented this shooting?