B
Bill_Martin
Guest
Please stop, you’re being confusing with all of your facts.In this shooting, it doesn’t appear that this shooter owned any guns. So how would preventing him from buying a gun have prevented this shooting?
Please stop, you’re being confusing with all of your facts.In this shooting, it doesn’t appear that this shooter owned any guns. So how would preventing him from buying a gun have prevented this shooting?
Ah, those pesky facts again!In this shooting, it doesn’t appear that this shooter owned any guns. So how would preventing him from buying a gun have prevented this shooting?
Please stop, you’re being confusing with all of your facts.
A gun without an owner?In this shooting, it doesn’t appear that this shooter owned any guns. So how would preventing him from buying a gun have prevented this shooting?
Apparently gun ownership is good until a member of your family decides to murder you and 18 children with it.A gun without an owner? Gee, how did that happen?
I am only asking a simple question. What change in laws would have prevented THIS shooting? It’s all well and good to say “we need stricter laws”. But unless you can come up with constructive suggestions, then your argument is pointless.Don’t get lost in the minutia.
They belonged to someone else…duhA gun without an owner?
Gee, how did that happen?
I’d have to know more about the case.I am only asking a simple question. What change in laws would have prevented THIS shooting? It’s all well and good to say “we need stricter laws”
It seems that the pro-gun crowd is always saying this whenever a massacre happens. Perhaps its time that THEY come up with constructive suggestions for why we shouldn’t prohibit free-for-all gun ownership. The answer always seems to be the same; if only someone else brought a loaded gun with them to school we could have had a shoot out at the OK Corral then everyone would wander off into the sunset safe and sound. Sorry, not good enough.But unless you can come up with constructive suggestions, then your argument is pointless.
I beg to differ.Weapons pose no threat to anyone.
Every mass shooting is stopped by someone with a gun. It’s too bad you want to force the victims to wait longer for that to happen.I’d have to know more about the case.
It seems that the pro-gun crowd is always saying this whenever a massacre happens. Perhaps its time that THEY come up with constructive suggestions for why we shouldn’t prohibit free-for-all gun ownership. The answer always seems to be the same; if only someone else brought a loaded gun with them to school we could have had a shoot out at the OK Corral then everyone would wander off into the sunset safe and sound. Sorry, not good enough.
So you don’t have any actual useful ideas then.I’d have to know more about the case.
It seems that the pro-gun crowd is always saying this whenever a massacre happens. Perhaps its time that THEY come up with constructive suggestions for why we shouldn’t prohibit free-for-all gun ownership. The answer always seems to be the same; if only someone else brought a loaded gun with them to school we could have had a shoot out at the OK Corral then everyone would wander off into the sunset safe and sound. Sorry, not good enough.
Case-in-point. Its never that the perpetrator should never have had that weapon in the first place; its that no one else was there to start shooting people.Every mass shooting is stopped by someone with a gun. It’s too bad you want to force the victims to wait longer for that to happen.
Of course, but the Constitution doesn’t say anything about ammunition.Gun ownership is a Constitutional right in this country. Banning gun ownership is not an option.
Good post.What amazes me is no one in the media sees the crux of the problem. The problem is not “we don’t have this law or that” but we as a society do not have a sense of right and wrong. The proposals from the Right and Left will not solve this. Conceal-carry laws or gun bans won’t protect society, because nowhere is the issue of morality addressed.
The proposals signifies to me, that our culture wishes to cling to its moral indifferent society but find a law that will offer the security of a moral society. You cannot have it both ways.
You can ban the guns or force everyone to own one, it won’t amount to a hill of beans if we allow the Culture of Satan to flourish.
So let’s drop the goofy “we need more/less guns” argument and pray for the victims and start publicly living and teaching the Faith.
Apparently there are quite a few without any journalistic integrity or ethical standards. In their ratings rush to be the first to get pictures of the perpetrators; they claimed they found the Facebook page of one of the shooters, aired his photos, and linked directly to his page. Too bad all their “research” consisted of was typing a name in the Facebook search box. They got the wrong kid and he’s been battling heinous posts and messages ever since. I smell a lawsuit.I don’t have a TV, so I don’t know how the networks have treated this, but almost immediately the online print media was politicizing this tragedy…
Just reading through the posts and you sir appear to be the most sensible, informed and balanced poster on this issue.It is my business because its an issue of public safety. Choosing to be ignorant of such activities is why 12 people died and 58 were injured in a Colorado movie theatre. A warranted investigation would have prevented that crime.
Again, I’m not advocating a complete prohibition on gun ownership.