old.usccb.org/sdwp/criminal.shtml#policy
Tell us why you want to prevent a teacher or any adult with (or without) a a state CC license, from stopping someone that’s killing the children?
Why not be honest and provide the Gospel teaching that supports killing, or an eye for an eye, as your arguments seem to support?
I see another public shooting has taken place. The shooter was stopped by a policeman. Should we consider it ‘lucky’ that only 3 people were shot, and only wounded? What would have been an acceptable number of children killed in this incident in Conn.?
I already did; Thou shall not kill.
Ok, let’s say a teacher had the gun and did stop the shooter in this instance. How many children deaths would have been an acceptable number, assuming the armed teacher was in the exact vicinity at the time? Or, how many killed in a crossfire would have been acceptable?
Another point, is it your opinion to word posts to say something someone did not say is an honest discussion? I wished this shooter had been stopped, or never began his spree. I never said anyone should be stopped, but come short of wanting to arm every single person in the world, which I believe takes us back to the ole west.
The lowest number possible.
So, we leave the tools specifically designed to kill accessible to those who go off?Once again, it’s the** culture of Death** not guns…but good luck getting some one-track minded individuals to see that.
I think I’m going to ask my girlfriend if she wouldn’t mind leaving the country with all of these goofy people in it, who seek magic bullets to solve our societal ills and ignore the 5,000 lb pink elephant in the room…the society itself.
Y’all are rearranging deck chairs on the Titanic.
And is arming everyone to the teeth with guns not a part of the culture of death?Once again, it’s the** culture of Death** not guns…but good luck getting some one-track minded individuals to see that.
I think I’m going to ask my girlfriend if she wouldn’t mind leaving the country with all of these agenda-driven people in it, who seek magic bullets to solve our societal ills and ignore the 5,000 lb pink elephant in the room…the society itself.
Y’all are rearranging deck chairs on the Titanic.
No one is grasping for straws, except those unwilling to have more controls placed on gun ownership.
You edited, after my other response. So, there is an acceptable loss of children in the scenario you ‘imagine’?
Until you change the culture that seeks to dehumanize life through television, movies, music and video games…you’re just putting new sails on a rotting ship.
If a lunatic is intent on killing many people, more gun laws will not deter him. There are more ways to kill than with guns. 9/11 was accomplished with box cutters. Oklahoma was done with bombs. The Mad Bomber used exploding packages. The crazy in Syria is using sarin gas.
Depends on which discussion you’ve posted in. In this case it would not have been revenge, but would have been living by the sword. Christ taught against that brother.
No I didn’t. My response was the lowest number of deaths possibleYou edited, after my other response. So, there is an acceptable loss of children in the scenario you ‘imagine’?
I don’t see gun rights as more important than any child, or group of children. I find it appalling, and revealing, that you think there is an acceptable loss of children for your gun rights to be maintained.
