Democratic convention

  • Thread starter Thread starter scipio337
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
I am surprised any of you are bothering to watch;) Peace, Carlan
I’m voting Obama and I’m not even watching! I will likely watch Obama’s speech though.

Conventions are pretty boring.

I always hated pep rallies in High School. . . . . .
 
Yeesh… Caroline Kennedy just invoked her Catholicism to support mandated paying for birth control & legal abortion.
It was Caroline’s inept attempt to show that some Catholic women support reproductive rights and family planning. Had she been a better speaker, she might have made her point more effectively. As it is, Caroline Kennedy is one of the least dynamic public speakers, totally the opposite of her father and uncles; still, I prefer her style to that of Nancy Pelosi, who sounds like a total scatterbrain.

Note it is not the intention of this post to engage, once again, in an abortion debate, so please save it for another post.
 
It was Caroline’s inept attempt to show that some Catholic women support reproductive rights. Had she been a better speaker, she might have made her point more effectively. As it is, Caroline Kennedy is one of the least dynamic speakers, totally the opposite of her father and uncles; still, I prefer her style to that of Nancy Pelosi, who sounds like a total scatterbrain.
It’s not surprising that she’s supporting a position that her Church rejects, but it is surprising that she said “as a Catholic”, because that is just a big thumb in the eye.

I thought she was more gracious than that.
 
I’m voting Obama and I’m not even watching! I will likely watch Obama’s speech though.

Conventions are pretty boring.

I always hated pep rallies in High School. . . . . .
The democrats and their media allies continue to misrepresent the facts regarding the financial crisis originating at Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac.

The truth is that the Bush administration tried to rein in the lenders but their efforts were blocked by democrats.

Here’s a New York Times article from 2003 which spells it out quite clearly. I’ll provide a few excerpts and a link:

New Agency Proposed to Oversee Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae
By STEPHEN LABATON
Published: September 11, 2003

The Bush administration today recommended the most significant regulatory overhaul in the housing finance industry since the savings and loan crisis a decade ago.

Under the plan, disclosed at a Congressional hearing today, a new agency would be created within the Treasury Department to assume supervision of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, the government-sponsored companies that are the two largest players in the mortgage lending industry…

Among the groups denouncing the proposal today were the National Association of Home Builders and Congressional Democrats who fear that tighter regulation of the companies could sharply reduce their commitment to financing low-income and affordable housing.

‘‘These two entities – Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac – are not facing any kind of financial crisis,’’ said Representative Barney Frank of Massachusetts, the ranking Democrat on the Financial Services Committee. ‘‘The more people exaggerate these problems, the more pressure there is on these companies, the less we will see in terms of affordable housing.’’

Representative Melvin L. Watt, Democrat of North Carolina, agreed.

‘‘I don’t see much other than a shell game going on here, moving something from one agency to another and in the process weakening the bargaining power of poorer families and their ability to get affordable housing,’’ Mr. Watt said.

nytimes.com/2003/09/11/bu…anted=3&src=pm

 
Hes going to win and win big. The Democrats know this-but they have to put on a good face so they can easing money. After Obama is defeated we will have to listen ad nauseam about what a racist country this is
I agree with you, and I really never make such predictions.
 
The democrats and their media allies continue to misrepresent the facts regarding the financial crisis originating at Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac.

The truth is that the Bush administration tried to rein in the lenders but their efforts were blocked by democrats.

Here’s a New York Times article from 2003 which spells it out quite clearly. I’ll provide a few excerpts and a link:

New Agency Proposed to Oversee Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae
By STEPHEN LABATON
Published: September 11, 2003

The Bush administration today recommended the most significant regulatory overhaul in the housing finance industry since the savings and loan crisis a decade ago.

Under the plan, disclosed at a Congressional hearing today, a new agency would be created within the Treasury Department to assume supervision of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, the government-sponsored companies that are the two largest players in the mortgage lending industry…

Among the groups denouncing the proposal today were the National Association of Home Builders and Congressional Democrats who fear that tighter regulation of the companies could sharply reduce their commitment to financing low-income and affordable housing.

‘‘These two entities – Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac – are not facing any kind of financial crisis,’’ said Representative Barney Frank of Massachusetts, the ranking Democrat on the Financial Services Committee. ‘‘The more people exaggerate these problems, the more pressure there is on these companies, the less we will see in terms of affordable housing.’’

Representative Melvin L. Watt, Democrat of North Carolina, agreed.

‘‘I don’t see much other than a shell game going on here, moving something from one agency to another and in the process weakening the bargaining power of poorer families and their ability to get affordable housing,’’ Mr. Watt said.

nytimes.com/2003/09/11/bu…anted=3&src=pm

Um. . . ok. . . thanks for sharing that.
 
Can’t wait for Nov. 7th, but I already know forumites will try to suck any fun I get out of my chiding. . . . 😦
While you may be chiding, HHS, Sebelius, and Obama will be preparing to clamp down on Catholics.
 
While you may be chiding, HHS, Sebelius, and Obama will be preparing to clamp down on Catholics.
SEE SEE. . . THERE IT IS!!

All I’m going to get is weeping and anger. . . .

No fun. 😦

I’ll still be here though- bright eyed and bushy tailed. 🙂
 
Just as you will never convince me that all Dems are Pro-Choice.
Just as you will never convince me all Republicans are Pro-Life.
Just as you will never convince me cutting taxes to our bare bones will save us.
🤷

Peace,Carlan
3 straw men in a row - good job, Carlan.

Ishii
 
SEE SEE. . . THERE IT IS!!

All I’m going to get is weeping and anger. . . .

No fun. 😦

I’ll still be here though- bright eyed and bushy tailed. 🙂
You fascinate me, haha, not sure if that is a good or bad thing.
 
Actually, as the article clearly states, Ms. Boo-Boo beat the Republican Convention…not tied.
People could draw all kinds of conclusions, but one is certain…We’re in big trouble.

John
Boo-Boo had to compete with the NFL this week
 
SEE SEE. . . THERE IT IS!!

All I’m going to get is weeping and anger. . . .

No fun. 😦

I’ll still be here though- bright eyed and bushy tailed. 🙂
No fun at all. But another 4 yrs of Obama will be no fun for Catholics. Even Cardinal George has predicted a loss of religious liberty, so of course we would not be looking forward to it. But the Church has survived repression before, and will again.

Still, the religious repression may be put on hold when the economic depression takes hold as the debt crisis seizes the globe. (I haven’t seen the movie 2016 so I don’t know what D’Souze predicts, but I have seen predictions from Catholic cardinals.)
 
So did the DNC…doesn’t speak too highly about the doings in Tampa, does it?

John
If it hadn’t been for football taking Boo-Boo fans…DNC probably would have lost out as well

A lot of people just have no interest in watching politics.
 
If it hadn’t been for football taking Boo-Boo fans…DNC probably would have lost out as well
Conjecture is one thing…the numbers are the numbers.

John
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top