J
JapaneseKappa
Guest
Furthermore: consider the oft-cited objection “these things could all be simultaneous! One would not precede the other!”Here is the problem: in what (metaphysical, not temporal) order do the following things occur?
God’s knowledge of his creation
God’s creation of his creation
Creation’s exercise of free will
Now, consider if the metaphysical order is:
God knows → God creates → creation exercises free will
Then the “God has foreknowledge” objection is valid in a sense.
The order
God creates → God knows → creation exercises free will
Doesn’t make much sense because how could God create something without knowing what he was creating? How can he know the outcome of an event that hasn’t (metaphysically) happen yet
The order
God knows → creation exercises free will → God creates
Doesn’t make much sense because how can we exercise free will before being created?
The order
God creates → creation exercises free will → God knows
Makes the most sense, but again, how can God create if he doesn’t know what he is creating?
Then the entirety of “creation exercises free will” must be simultaneous with God’s creation and knowledge. I therefore can easily conclude the following:
Pontius Pilate’s decision to wash his hands is simultaneous with God’s creation.
The US people’s decision to elect Barack Obama is simultaneous with God’s creation.
Therefore, Pontius Pilate’s decision to wash his hands is simultaneous with the US people’s decision to elect Barack Obama. In fact, we can conclude that any two free-will decisions are simultaneous with each other by virtue of being simultaneous with God’s creation and/or knowledge. Therefore, all free will decisions are made simultaneously.