Gun Carrying Catholics Armed

  • Thread starter Thread starter Seagull
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
40.png
Vonsalza:
Of course I think they’ll grandfather existing ARs.
if you want people to stop purchasing semi-auto weapons you need to get rid of yours now.
The minute I only have them because of a grandfathering provision I’ll be sure to do just that.

If you don’t like that, I’m sure you’ll carry on somehow.
 
A guy owning a mill or a lathe isn’t a new thing. If those folks wanted to be lawbreakers they’d be lathing and milling fully automatic lowers but they don’t. They don’t want to go to prison.
Yep, this would pretty much keep law abiding folks from owning them. If that’s the objective it will work pretty well.
 
40.png
Vonsalza:
A guy owning a mill or a lathe isn’t a new thing. If those folks wanted to be lawbreakers they’d be lathing and milling fully automatic lowers but they don’t. They don’t want to go to prison.
Yep, this would pretty much keep law abiding folks from owning them. If that’s the objective it will work pretty well.
The objective is their dramatically reduced availability in society. And I agree, it does work pretty well.

Despite machinists being able to make them, how many gun-crimes in the US in the last 50 years have involved automatics?
 
The objective is their dramatically reduced availability in society. And I agree, it does work pretty well.
Yes, either the law abiding will be kept in check by confiscating their guns…or by their not being inclined to break the law in the first place. The effect on the lawless will be entirely different, and much more minimal.
 
It’s not really a ban if you have 15 million legal exceptions in the market, is it.
 
All mechanical parts wear out. That’s inherent to a mechanical object.
No, that’s not practically true.
The lower receiver isn’t a moving part.

The barrel, extractor, ejector, springs, gas rings are parts with friction that will wear out, and none are controlled items.

A lower receiver can survive for generations if it was kept clean and stored out of the elements. It doesn’t take the stress of firing.
 
Last edited:
40.png
Vonsalza:
The objective is their dramatically reduced availability in society. And I agree, it does work pretty well.
Yes, either the law abiding will be kept in check by confiscating their guns…
No one is going to take your guns, Ender.
or by their not being inclined to break the law in the first place. The effect on the lawless will be entirely different, and much more minimal.
If the black market price on even a cheap (but functioning) AR15 rises above a grand, grand and a half, you’ve effectively eliminated the ability for the vast vaaast majority of criminals to get one - as most of them are poor.

That black market dealer won’t take their Visa. Paper trail. Gotta cash-up or you’re out of luck.
 
A lower receiver can survive for generations if it was kept clean and stored out of the elements. It doesn’t take the stress of firing.
This is what claims guns more than anything - lack of care.

Attrition is real, Theo. And a lower without an upper is just a fancy paper-weight.
 
It’s not really a ban if you have 15 million legal exceptions in the market, is it.
On the secondary market, and their price will rise considerably once you can’t buy them at the store anymore.
 
Your average thug does’t have the scratch to buy gold. 😉
They’d just buy the ruger mini-14, which has been excluded from all assault weapon bans so far 🙂

The mini-14 is more than adequate for any criminal tasks.
 
Last edited:
40.png
Vonsalza:
Your average thug does’t have the scratch to buy gold. 😉
They’d just buy the ruger mini-14, which has been excluded from all assault weapon bans so far 🙂

The mini-14 is more than adequate for any criminal tasks.
Which is why I’ve been pretty consistent in wanting a sort of ban on semiautos as an entire class.

But the mini-14 is a nice rifle - especially if you put a stiffener on the underside of the barrel that slightly improves accuracy, but more importantly, makes it look more like its big-brother the M1 Garand/M14/Springfield M1a.
 
Last edited:
40.png
Vonsalza:
Your average thug does’t have the scratch to buy gold. 😉
They’d just buy the ruger mini-14, which has been excluded from all assault weapon bans so far 🙂

The mini-14 is more than adequate for any criminal tasks.
But in fairness, you’d get about all the performance out of a lever gun that you’d get out of the mini. They’re both relatively short range rifles. 100-150 yds.
 
Last edited:
No rifle is much good out past 150 yrds, without a scope.
Ammo selection is probably more important for accuracy than the rifle.
 
No rifle is much good out past 150 yrds, without a scope.
Ammo selection is probably more important for accuracy than the rifle.
At range, ammo selection does become important. But the tightness of the action and whether the barrel is free or not (no ammo tube or stock banded to it) makes a difference too.

Early 90s minis were described chidingly as “barn door accurate”. They’ve retooled and put a thicker barrel on them since then. The older, thinner ones used to “whip” a little bit.
 
Last edited:
And someone who knows how to shoot also knows how to tweak some increased accuracy out of an average rifle. I expect most novices will be as accurate with an AR as with a Mini. So much gun talk is about sniper accuracy that most shooters can’t deliver.
 
And someone who knows how to shoot also knows how to tweak some increased accuracy out of an average rifle. I expect most novices will be as accurate with an AR as with a Mini. So much gun talk is about sniper accuracy that most shooters can’t deliver.
That’s absolutely right.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top