I have never raised any children and I don’t know if I have any.
Since you are a parent and as you said, “And it has over the years taught me and given me tremendous perspective regarding Fatherhood in general.”, doesn’t it seem way past cruel to punish someone for ever and ever and …, and then speak about how wonderful and kind and merciful this being is especially taking into consideration that this being knew before this someone was even created by this being that this is where this someone would be?
No. You clearly don’t understand what hell is and why it exists.
You assume that it was created to
specifically “punish” or “discipline” people. You’re wrong.
As far as “This whole discussion has been about you and your opinions.”, actually some of it has been about what God has revealed to me and as far as any of that, that you will have to take up with God.
I don’t think God “revealed” anything to you. What you heard is “God is love”, you then twisted it into this idea of universal salvation based upon your false idea of what love is.
And as far as, "Yet you’re silent on a very simple question like “do you have children? " It simply doesn’t make sense.”, as I said this is about God not me but as a parent, do you think that any discipline (punishment, rightly deserved and justifiable) that you use on any of your children should last forever???
I, personally, believe that it is a form of child abuse to not discipline a child and every child needs different discipline, not a one size fits all, that said, I do not believe that any parent should discipline their child for ever and ever and ever and any god that would, I can not see how anyone can say that that god is so merciful, so kind, so good, yet you seem to think and applaud this, do you or don’t you?
Hell isn’t specifically for the punishment or discipline. Punishment and/or discipline has a purpose, its purpose is remedial.
Hell is not God sending His children to their room for being “bad”. Hell is God’s children suing their Father for emancipation from Him and His household because they don’t want to live by His rule.
You can believe all that you want concerning what others say that you should believe but don’t you think about these things or do you just repeat what the doctrine or dogma is?
Not only is this a rather crass and ignorant rhetorical question, you also implicitly claim that there is some dichotomy between Christ and His Church. That’s something that you normally hear from a protestant, not a professed “Catholic”.
This is a scenario that I thought of quite a while ago: Imagine that you kick the bucket and you wake up in heaven and it is way better and way beyond your wildest dreams and you are just basking in all of this and you happen to look down and see your mother or your father, your husband or your wife, your sister or your brother, your son or your daughter, or your best friend in hell, how heavenly would this be then?
Another absurd question. You’re asking if God’s joy, or the joy of the blessed, can be blackmailed by the knowledge of someone they loved in hell.
The answer is no. Because, as Scripture plainly tells us, “then”(in heaven) we shall know as we are known. We will know joy as God knows joy.
It’s like having a spouse that you have been with for 20, 30, 50, or 70 years all of a sudden come to you and say to you, “I’ve been seeing and been committing adultery with other people the entire time I’ve been married to you.” "Aside from the immediate feelings of anger and guilt and betrayal there is also this one firm belief: “I never knew you.”
Which is precisely what Jesus says in His parables in regards to people who refuse Him," depart from me…I never knew you."
Those in hell won’t be persons, they’ve abandoned any and all personal identity, therefore we won’t even recognize them. To use an analogy, they won’t even resemble the wood, instead they’ll be more like ashes, or remains, not persons.
Things do NOT have to be theologically kosher for one to ponder, ponder this scenario and may your heart not be cold as ice and hard as a stone.
The problem isn’t my “supposed” hard hart, Tom. The problem is your soft head. You can’t compromise the truth to make your theory of “love” fit so that its agreeable to your sensibilities.
Love only “works” when it is true. If God was love in your sense then it was foolish for God to send His Son to die a horrific scourging and death and the hands of the ones He came to save.
If God is “love” in your sense of it then there was no reason for Jesus to come at all. God could have just “saved” everyone without Calvary at the snap of His anthropomorphic finger.
So, yes, things HAVE to be theologically kosher to ponder any scenario regarding God because that’s what theology is: the study of God.
If something is not “theologically kosher” then that something-in this case your opinion of universal salvation-is wrong. You can base your opinion upon an incomplete idea of love and ignore the other half of the data because its not agreeable to you.
To say that has nothing to do with the state of someone’s heart, its just stating a truth.