B
Bradski
Guest
So you don’t work on a Sunday, then…Yep.
So you don’t work on a Sunday, then…Yep.
That’s not one of the commandsSo you don’t work on a Sunday, then…
Exodus 31:15That’s not one of the commands![]()
Where do you get the idea that “the Sabbath” is the day of the week we know as Sunday?Exodus 31:15
Six days may work be done; but in the seventh is the sabbath of rest, holy to the LORD: whosoever doeth any work in the sabbath day, he shall surely be put to death.
Not much wiggle room there, is there…
But what about the suffering of children, who did not do anything wrong, and do not have perfect free will?If God prevented everyone from being victims of misfortunes it would defeat the purpose of creating an orderly universe in which we are free to choose what to believe and how to live.:
Sabbath was taken to be the 7th day of the week which was always a Saturday (I guess God must start work on a Sunday).Then the Council of Laodicea said: ‘Hey guys, let’s make the holy day Sunday instead!’Where do you get the idea that “the Sabbath” is the day of the week we know as Sunday?
The Council of Laodicea?Sabbath was taken to be the 7th day of the week which was always a Saturday (I guess God must start work on a Sunday).Then the Council of Laodicea said: ‘Hey guys, let’s make the holy day Sunday instead!’
This is the sort of absurd argumentation which reflects poorly on you Bradski.Now whether that means that God’s command is now applicable to a Sunday I shall leave to you and Achilles. Either way, whichever day you decide, you are commanded not to do any work. And that means No Work, Amandil. Not less work, or a little work or can’t-I-just-wash-the-dog. It means no work at all
Canon 29.The Council of Laodicea? Do you have anything to support this in that you have proof that here and only here this decision was made?
Does that include the Jews?The will of the Father is to TRUST HIS SON. So if you do not trust his SON you will not get in.
Does this go against what God has commanded?Christians must not judaize by resting on the Sabbath…
You can forget it Tomdstone…The majority here don’t truly want to think about that. You’ll get the standard non-answers and nothing more. Of course, if I still worshipped that god, maybe I could get those answers out without choking.But what about the suffering of children, who did not do anything wrong, and do not have perfect free will?
You’re hardly in a position to accuse others of non-answers when you have not even attempted to explain how all misfortunes on this planet could be prevented. An earthly Utopia is an infantile fantasy:You can forget it Tomdstone…The majority here don’t truly want to think about that. You’ll get the standard non-answers and nothing more. Of course, if I still worshipped that god, maybe I could get those answers out without choking.
Do you really believe an infinitely loving Father would deliberately inflict an eternity of suffering on His children by creating an indestructible torture chamber?The Jews often used images and hyperbole to emphasize a point. Only Fundamentalists interpret everything in Scripture literally.
Jesus quoted Hosea:
Hosea 6:6For I desire mercy, not sacrifice…
Only God can know if they’ll grow up to be like their parents or not.Civilizations include innocent individuals, particularly children:
That is beside the point.
You are implying life on this earth is** totally **insignificant. Doesn’t it matter **at all **if children are killed before they have had a chance to develop?In addition, we’re not talking about children in the context of eternal damnation in hell; we’re talking about them in the context of God totally destroying a civilization. So if someone’s truly innocent then they aren’t really destroyed by God at all, since the righteous can never see death (Jn. 8:51, etc.).
You make a typical protestant mistake assuming that the practice began upon the decision of a canon.Canon 29.
Christians must not judaize by resting on the Sabbath, but must work on that day, rather honouring the Lord’s Day; and, if they can, resting then as Christians. But if any shall be found to be judaizers, let them be anathema from Christ.
Not binding, but then I guess you have to decide which commands are if you are to obey them. I take it we can skip everything in Exodus then? I’d hate to think of you getting sentenced to death if you give your old man a smack in the mouth.
I’ve told you the answer already on this thread: God will rectify all unjustfied suffering. He permits it for a time but not forever. I can even show you Biblical passages that prove this if you’d like.You can forget it Tomdstone…The majority here don’t truly want to think about that. You’ll get the standard non-answers and nothing more. Of course, if I still worshipped that god, maybe I could get those answers out without choking.
But I have Tony, you just didn’t follow. I have said over and over that suffering here on earth could be prevented by any involved omnipotent, omniscient, omnibenevolent god. But we don’t have one of those…do we? Apparently not, because the power of omnipotence alone would suffice.You’re hardly in a position to accuse others of non-answers when you have not even attempted to explain how all misfortunes on this planet could be prevented. An earthly Utopia is an infantile fantasy:
385 God is infinitely good and all his works are good. Yet** no one can escape the experience of suffering or the evils in nature which seem to be linked to the limitations proper to creatures**: and above all to the question of moral evil.
So the deist God is one who is a creator, but is not all powerful? What other limitations would there be on the deist God? Philosophers, at least the Christian philosophers, go through an argument showing that if God exists, He must be all powerful. How would you address those arguments and do you have a recommended reference?You can forget it Tomdstone…The majority here don’t truly want to think about that. You’ll get the standard non-answers and nothing more. Of course, if I still worshipped that god, maybe I could get those answers out without choking.
Since I am quite new to the belief system, not religion, I’ll give you one of the sources I have been using. Deism has no dogma, but deists do their best to be guided by reason.So the deist God is one who is a creator, but is not all powerful? What other limitations would there be on the deist God? Philosophers, at least the Christian philosophers, go through an argument showing that if God exists, He must be all powerful. How would you address those arguments and do you have a recommended reference?