How To Get To Heaven When You Die

  • Thread starter Thread starter xfrodobagginsx
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
Blotted out when we reject Jesus Christ as Lord and Savior.
Yet when you read Revelations, those blotted out were so because they did not obey Him, which constitutes rejection of Him. So the rejection isn’t merely because they failed to recognize Him, but that even those who did proclaim Him but did not obey Him were taken off.
 
Um - so, we’re born “saved,” except if we don’t get “saved”? :rolleyes:
Well…ya. Many people including the Jews believe that there is an age of accoutablility. Reference when Davids child died in the old testiment:

2Sa 12:23 But now he is dead, wherefore should I fast? can I bring him back again? I shall go to him, but he shall not return to me.

We know that david was redeemed. If the child went to hell, then David wouldn’t have said I shall go to him.
 
I am the one who voted “by praying to Mary”. To Jesus, through Mary. However, I have also made the Heroic Act Of Love to Mary, for the Poor Souls, so must undergo my full time in Purgatory. 😦
Do you worship mary above God? Jesus said to come unto Him, He didn’t say to come through mary. Plus, there is no purgatory at all. It’s not even meantioned in the bible.
 
100% moral assurance, yes, but not what most Protestants suggest today: absolute assurance.

what about Romans 13:11:
“…salvation is nearer to us now than when we first believed”,
a reference to future salvation. By being “saved”[in the “born again”, protestant sense] we would have nothing to hope for anymore because we KNOW Heaven is ours. This is wrong and unbiblical because our salvation is founded upon the hope of something says St. Paul. “
"For in hope we were saved. Now hope that sees for itself is not hope. For who hopes for what one sees? ”Romans 8:24].

this verse is crystal clear: if you SEE heaven [ie: if you have an
absolute assurance of salvation because you are “saved”] your hope is seen and therefore according to St. Paul, is not hope
at all and cannot bring about salvation.
He is probably referring to the salvation of the physical body. The bible is very clear that when you trust Jesus Christ as Lord and Savior, you are saved and sealed, forever.
 
Do you worship mary above God? Jesus said to come unto Him, He didn’t say to come through mary. Plus, there is no purgatory at all. It’s not even meantioned in the bible.
No Catholic worships Mary. As for there’s no Purgatory, where do you think David’s child go, and then he also went along with him later? Heaven wasn’t open yet to mankind until Jesus’ resurrection.
 
Yeah! No Kidding!!!
Who would have thought Frodo Baggins himself would make an appearance on this forum with propaganda? He probably didn’t think anyone would notice at first with the “x’s” before and after his name as a disguise, but now I’ve figured it out.
** I still would like to know what happened to his finger after Golem bit it off. I couldn’t tell if it was sewn back on or not.**

Seriously, isn’t this nonsense from a Jack Chick brochure or something? I know I’ve seen it before.
I’ve actually wondered that (in bold) too! I love me some Lord of the Rings!

This thread is toxic, yet I can’t help but “check” on it daily to see if young Frodo has seen the error in his thinking, so far it’s not happening. :o

The mods have posted twice already, it will be shut down soon I’m sure (hopefully).
 
All of the above. Faith in Jesus will entail believing all He has revealed, obeying all He has commanded, and availing ourselves of all the helps He has lovingly given us. 🙂
 
Wonderful Apologetics from everyone but here is a very simple answer to the Question of Assurance of Salvation. (Sorrry if I’m repeating stuff already said I read most of the posts but not all)

When someone like the original poster asks a Catholic if they are “Saved” what they really mean is “Don’t you wish you had the assurance of Salvation like me.”

The Original poster stated that You need to make Jesus Lord and Savior of you life and
DO YOU BELIEVE THAT JESUS CHRIST DIED ON THE CROSS AND ROSE FROM THE DEAD FOR YOUR SINS? DO YOU ACCEPT WHAT HE DID FOR YOU TO PAY FOR YOUR SINS?

That is True. That is necessary for Salvation. The problem is an individual can truly believe that with all his heart at one point in his life then totally not believe later in life.

Here is the conundrum. John (name used for example) gets “saved” according to original posters method. John Believes with all his heart Christ died for his sins and repents and accepts Jesus as his Lord and Savior- says prayer and makes commitment to Christ. For 10 years he is an awesome Christian. He believes he’s saved, those around him believe he’s saved. Then he begins to backslide (no problem here it happens to all Christians from time to time. Not unsaved yet) but then John has some sort of life crisis where everything he once believed he no longer believes. I’ve seen it happen over and over again. So John now no longer believes that Christ died for his sins and completely with free will lets say converts to a pagan religion.

What ordinarily happens is people like original poster would say he wasn’t really saved. But here’s the rub HE THOUGHT FOR 10 years HE WAS SAVED. The People around him thought he was saved. So if you can think you are saved and then fall away there is no assurance. I could be like John. (However I personally feel that my relationship with Christ is so tight I would like to think that that would never happen to me and I have good assurance I am not in mortal sin and that I am would get to heaven if I were to die today) But I could be like John in my example, and anyone else claiming to be saved at present could end up like John.
The criteria the original poster used said Salvation was contingent on belief. the Fact is belief can change! People have free will. I know people who have truly believed with all there heart that Jesus Christ is their Lord and Savior and then for what ever reason turn their back on him.

Christ can truly keep those that are his but he never keeps someone againt their will.

My view of the situation, and why after being protestant for over
20 years I am in RCIA
Deeny

PS: I hear more straight scripture read every Sunday in the Catholic church than I ever heard in a protestant Bible church and the scripture read reflect the whole of scripture not just the Pastors personal favorites (Those favorite pet scriptures of the Pastor that usually support his personal view point while leaving problematic scriptures out)

OK That was way more than my 2 cents.
Thinking you are saved and being saved are two different things.

There must be a genuine relationship with Jesus Christ. If there isn’t one, there is no salvation. We get this relationship through believing in our HEART. Yes you can have a head knowledge of salvation, but no genuine relationship. That is true, but a true believer will NEVER turn away from Jesus. He can’t.
 
So, you elevate “the church” above Jesus Christ? No way, man not in a million years. You have it back wards buddy. Honor the church, ya, but NEVER elevate ANYTHING or anyone above the Lord Himself. You do it by trusting in Jesus Christ as the bible clearly says. You have No scripture to back that faulty teaching, just a faulty church tradition which contradicts God’s word.
You have a faulty understanding.

In the Teachings of the Catholic Church, Christ is the Church. One is not elevated over the other because Christ is the Church.

So when Catholic Christian says, I trust in the Church it is the same as saying I trust in Christ because Christ is the Church.

There are many scriptures that I could quote on this but that is not the thrust of this thread on how to get to heaven.

You do not need to agree with us that Christ is the Church, but you do need to understand in order to prevent statements that are faulty as the one above.

We do not place the Church above Christ because according to our interpretation of scripture and the teachings of the apostles, Christ is the Church.

God Bless,
Maria
 
I’ve actually wondered that (in bold) too! I love me some Lord of the Rings!

This thread is toxic, yet I can’t help but “check” on it daily to see if young Frodo has seen the error in his thinking, so far it’s not happening. :o

The mods have posted twice already, it will be shut down soon I’m sure (hopefully).
Shut down…let’s hope! But these threads are entertaining! 😛

Cheers!
 
Frodo-wow like I haven’t heard all this tripe before-Please -I beg you come up with something new- I’ve heard all this Jack Chick nonsense practically my whole life and it’s really rather boringI. There is nothing in your demeanor and words that would even tempt me to your way of christianity. your view of God is so narrow that i can’t help thinking that He reflects you instead what He truly is. have fun condemning people to hell:thumbsup: 'Love is patient,love is kind…"
 
Knowing Him personally is never enough to be saved. What is needed to be saved? It is knowing and obeying Him–it is both, not either or. Many proclaim Jesus and yet continue to sin–are these saved as well?
Every person who knows Him continues to sin, even though they don’t want to and try not to.

This was written to born again Christians:

1Jo 1:8 ¶ If we say that we have no sin, we deceive ourselves, and the truth is not in us.

1Jo 1:9 If we confess our sins, he is faithful and just to forgive us our sins, and to cleanse us from all unrighteousness.

1Jo 1:10 If we say that we have not sinned, we make him a liar, and his word is not in us

We sin so we need to confess our sins to Him daily to keep a right relationship with Him.
 
He is probably referring to the salvation of the physical body. The bible is very clear that when you trust Jesus Christ as Lord and Savior, you are saved and sealed, forever.
Frodo, did it ever occur to you that maybe, just maybe, you, and those who instructed you MISINTERPRETED the Bible. In my experience, whenever a Protestant starts a sentence with the words, “The Bible is very clear that…”, surely something heretical is about to follow. Explain this one, Frodo
Matthew 13:20-21 “The seed that fell on patches of rock is the man who hears the message and at first receives it with joy. But he has no roots, so he lasts only for a time. When some setback or persecution involving the message occurs, he soon falters.”
In what way could that not be applicable to someone who followed your “sinner’s prayer” method of salvation? DO NOT answer my question with another question or change the subject. DO NOT try to come up with other verses to “prove” your point. Address this verse!
 
Every person who knows Him continues to sin, even though they don’t want to and try not to.
Yet isn’t the call of Christ for us to be perfect, just as His Father is perfect? Christ calls us not to sin; it is no excuse for us to say that we continue to sin, so we must live in sin anyway, as your thought implies.
We sin so we need to confess our sins to Him daily to keep a right relationship with Him.
That is right, because we need to…what? To sin again? Of course not. We confess our sins and keep a right relationship with Him because sin is an affront to Him. Therefore, wouldn’t it be reasonable to stop sinning rather than to sin? Wouldn’t it then be better to strive for that perfection, as Jesus asks us to do?
 
No Catholic worships Mary. As for there’s no Purgatory, where do you think David’s child go, and then he also went along with him later? Heaven wasn’t open yet to mankind until Jesus’ resurrection.
David went to abrahams bosom located in paradise.

Lu 16:22 And it came to pass, that the beggar died, and was carried by the angels into Abraham’s bosom: the rich man also died, and was buried;

Lu 23:43 And Jesus said unto him, Verily I say unto thee, To day shalt thou be with me in paradise.

Before Jesus Christ died on the cross, the believers couldn’t go to heaven, they went to paradise. Paradise is/was located in the center of the earth where those in hell could see there but not go there and vice versa. After Jesus Christ rose from the dead and acended into heaven, the old testiment saints went up to heaven, as do the Christians afterward.
 
David went to abrahams bosom located in paradise.

Lu 16:22 And it came to pass, that the beggar died, and was carried by the angels into Abraham’s bosom: the rich man also died, and was buried;
The proper term there is Sheol, the Jewish abode for the dead, not yet paradise, as Jesus will not open paradise until His resurrection. We see this in your next quote, when He promised the thief paradise.
 
So, you elevate “the church” above Jesus Christ? No way, man not in a million years. You have it back wards buddy. Honor the church, ya, but NEVER elevate ANYTHING or anyone above the Lord Himself. You do it by trusting in Jesus Christ as the bible clearly says. You have No scripture to back that faulty teaching, just a faulty church tradition which contradicts God’s word.
You cannot show me any place in Catholic teaching where what you have stated is our belief. Catholig has be ineloquent in his statement, but the principle is that Christ built His church, and that Church believed and taught certain things that are recorded both in the New Testament and in Christian history.

If in fact your own beliefs do not align with those verifiable teachings, then who is wrong?
Blotted out when we reject Jesus Christ as Lord and Savior.
I’m sorry, but that is not at all what the passage says and not at all what it even remotely implies.

What you have offered is your own faith community’s all too fallible interpretation, and it glaringly contradicts what the Word of God says in this case.
The very word Baptizo, literally means:
  1. baptizw baptizo, bap-tid’-zo
    Search for 907 in KJV
from a derivative of 911; to immerse, submerge; to make whelmed (i.e. fully wet); used only (in the New Testament) of ceremonial ablution, especially (technically) of the ordinance of Christian baptism:–Baptist, baptize, wash.

Mt 3:16 And Jesus, when he was baptized, went up straightway out of the water: and, lo, the heavens were opened unto him, and he saw the Spirit of God descending like a dove, and lighting upon him:
this is all well and good, but the fact is that the early church (both in the New Testament and after, had no such scruples on this matter, as the story of the Philippian jailer points out to us here.

Acts 16:[23] And when they had inflicted many blows upon them, they threw them into prison, charging the jailer to keep them safely.
[24] Having received this charge, he put them into the inner prison and fastened their feet in the stocks.
[25] But about midnight Paul and Silas were praying and singing hymns to God, and the prisoners were listening to them,
[26] and suddenly there was a great earthquake, so that the foundations of the prison were shaken; and immediately all the doors were opened and every one’s fetters were unfastened.
[27] When the jailer woke and saw that the prison doors were open, he drew his sword and was about to kill himself, supposing that the prisoners had escaped.
[28] But Paul cried with a loud voice, “Do not harm yourself, for we are all here.”
[29] And he called for lights and rushed in, and trembling with fear he fell down before Paul and Silas,
[30] and brought them out and said, “Men, what must I do to be saved?”
[31] And they said, “Believe in the Lord Jesus, and you will be saved, you and your household.”
[32] And they spoke the word of the Lord to him and to all that were in his house.
[33] And he took them the same hour of the night, and washed their wounds, and he was baptized at once, with all his family.
[34] Then he brought them up into his house, and set food before them; and he rejoiced with all his household that he had believed in God.

Notice that he washed their wounds and then he and his whole household was baptized. It nowhere says that they carted him and his whole family off to the riverside to have a baptism. In fact it was the middle of the night…

Moreover, the earliest verifiably Christian writings show this was never an issue.

From the Didache (The teaching of the Twelve Apostles):
Chapter 7. Concerning Baptism. And concerning baptism, baptize this way: Having first said all these things, baptize into the name of the Father, and of the Son, and of the Holy Spirit, in living water. **But if you have no living water, baptize into other water; and if you cannot do so in cold water, do so in warm. But if you have neither, pour out water three times upon the head into the name of Father and Son and Holy Spirit. **But before the baptism let the baptizer fast, and the baptized, and whoever else can; but you shall order the baptized to fast one or two days before.
 
Well, you said so yourself–the Church is the body of Christ, so the Church is part of Christ.

If the Church does not save, then Jesus does not save, since the Church is part of Him and is given power by Him.

You’ll have a lot of reading to do to understand what early Christians believed in, starting from the early Church Fathers
Who is the president Laura Bush or George W. Bush? If you say George W. Bush then can Laura Bush give you a pardon? No, but the bible says that

Ge 2:24 Therefore shall a man leave his father and his mother, and shall cleave unto his wife: and they shall be one flesh.

If that’s true than under your logic she is George W. Bush. But we know that she isn’t and doesn’t have His authority. He can give her authority, but Jesus hasn’t given the church the authority to save. He has given the church the responsibiblity of pointing people to Himself as the Savior, not to the bride, but to the groom. The bride isn’t the Savior, the groom is.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top