T
TheAmazingGrace
Guest
That makes no sense.I’m saying that if they have the money, it may suggest that they have been able to spend for a better education.
That makes no sense.I’m saying that if they have the money, it may suggest that they have been able to spend for a better education.
Now you’re just being rude.Now it looks like you’re being the unreasonable one here. Again, proof you just don’t want to cooperate.
Unwilling? Really? How do you know that? And I would expect a veterinarian for oral surgery on my dog, yes.untrained and unwilling. You’re talking about enacting it as law. What’s next? the veterinarian for oral surgery? Teachers, are not by right (unless perhaps having been in the military or former police) trained to enforce law with the use of guns in a military type of atmosphere. Clearer now?
It makes perfect sense, you just don’t want to admit it.That makes no sense.
No, it doesn’t. A more expensive education doesn’t mean that a person has better grades or is more qualified.It makes perfect sense, you just don’t want to admit it.
Flagged for personal attacks.Don’t be a snowflake.
Enacting a law for a vocation that has it’s focus on education to carry a gun and engage an active shooter while defending and moving a classroom of frightened children to safety is insane. Sorry, not buying it, and neither are many others. This was suggested before and I have not seen any teacher unions fighting for this as part of their job description.Unwilling? Really? How do you know that? And I would expect a veterinarian for oral surgery on my dog, yes.
Although not the current discussion we were having (nor the topic) and not being personally familiar with the instruments utilized in the procedure, perhaps you could begin a topic and enlighten us. I’ll join the discussion if I choose to.Looking forward to your call to control forceps, scalpels and any other tool used in abortions…
It’s the current status quo.“The Amazing Grace” Or are we going to make people pay out of pocket, putting everyone who can’t afford or doesn’t have time for extensive active shooter scenario training at a disadvantage?
It cost $200 for the coursework to obtain my concealed carry permit (16 hours total), it cost $150 for the permit itself. Because I live in Illinois, I also had to get a FOID card (although that only costs $10).
My range membership costs me $200/year, and I can go anytime during daylight hours any day of the year. I usually make it once a week for live fire; I do dry fire practice daily at home (which is a lot cheaper, though I beat up my snap caps something fierce). I spend about $20 per week for 200 rounds of 22LR (which I use for the bulk of my practice because of cost). FMJ for the 9mm runs me about $15/week (50 rounds). The JHP I don’t shoot much of–so I keep the cost of that down. I mostly print my own targets from a website, so that just costs me basic typing paper and printer ink.
Those of us who intend to be our own bodyguards just quietly do that … we’re definitely not looking for a handout from the government to cover that cost. I think that the “arming teachers” is more of an issue with repealing “gun free zone” laws (which are really “bad guy invitation zones”) and allow school faculty and/or staff who have followed their state’s regulations for concealed carry to do so. Maybe on a school district by school district basis, decisions might be made to then cover some portion of the permit cost.
Apples and oranges, really–in a shooting competition, shot placement is so crucial that a few millimeters one way or another can make the difference in winning vs not winning. But for self defense, the general advice is to “train the way you are” and if all the rounds hit paper, that’s a good result (rather than drilling a hole in the center).redbetta:![]()
Or add to the casualties. My old shooting instructor used to advise against consuming sugar or caffeine 48 hours before a competition, because it would mess with our aim. If merely drinking coffee is enough to compromise the accuracy of one’s shot, imagine how much worse it’s going to be when:Having more people armed can stop a rampage sooner.
- You’re in a crowded area full of people screaming, panicking, and running.
- You have a moving target who is also trying to kill you.
- Your target likely has more firepower than you.
- You have an ungodly amount of adrenaline coursing through your body.
I agree with you here and I would venture to say most do. The concept is from conception to grave but the current discussion stemmed from those within that synagogue who lost their lives, and one was in their 90’s. He/She too had a right to life.If life is not respected from conception then it is not surprising that it is not respected in other stages of life whether it is by gun or pulling a plug.
If they passed, perhaps it does. I’m not making this my main argument or anything but I’m just pointing out the possibility.No, it doesn’t. A more expensive education doesn’t mean that a person has better grades or is more qualified.
I didn’t mean for it to be a personal attack. I’m sorry. I’ll delete the post.Flagged for personal attacks.
I see what you mean.First, let’s define what the obvious and basic ones are. People can’t even seem to agree on those.