G
goodcatholic
Guest
honestly didn’t even notice. I was in a hurry“destroyculturalmarxim…”?
honestly didn’t even notice. I was in a hurry“destroyculturalmarxim…”?
It is a “creeping totalitarian form that generates social-liberal dogmas” only in the sense that a Trump presidency is a creeping totalitarian form that promotes white supremacy, that is, not at all. How can the most radical of a group said to be creeping (forward?) when the national election went to Donald Trump? Before we had Obama, Bush, Clinton…It is a creeping totalitarian form that generates social-liberal dogmas
White guilt alone is a suicidal strategy which is why its proponents import the 3rd world en masse. The next few generations of whites are going to be very right wing indeed based on the above factors.
I’m not from the USA, so I wasn’t thinking about your presidents, but as for a pattern.Notice a pattern? I sure don’t.
Children growing up today are going to have a hard time learning to think critically. While we have a ton of information, that also means there is more of what one wants to hear. Even among the older people here, conservatives are always linking their favorite bloggers, and liberals theirs.It’s very easy these days to wind up trapped in an echo chamber and not realize what the outside political climate is.
I think you have a point. As someone who lives in the UK, I think where we are now is where you will go in terms of many such issues, unless you recognise the threat and take it seriously.Watching some of the political decisions, both in the UK and in Canada is like watching reality suddenly fast-forwarded to show where a significant number of US citizens desire the US to go.
I tried to look it up on Wiki but was redirected to The Frankfurt School. Its hard to find an objective definition of the words. Can you provide one?Of course it’s a biased definition.
Modern day Marxists aren’t following the true culture of Communism so much as being useful idiots good only for destabilizing western nations.We would never come to believe that a homosexual could embody the conditions and requirements of conduct that would enable us to consider him a true Revolutionary, a true Communist militant. A deviation of that nature clashes with the concept we have of what a militant Communist must be
-Fidel Castro
Its almost as if no one cares about what make believe gender you are when Papa Stalin needs his 5 year plan done.
Or take the worship of minorities by modern day liberals and compare it to the treatment of minorities in commie nations such as the Soviet Union where Ukrainians were subject to artificial famine, or look to China’s treatment of Tibet.
That’s the complaint a lot of us have - that it’s not really so much a thing with a clear definition, as a way to smear anything vaguely progressive, even things that have no logical connection to each other.I tried to look it up on Wiki but was redirected to The Frankfurt School. Its hard to find an objective definition of the words. Can you provide one?