Jill Biden’s ex-husband accuses her of affair with Joe in 1970s

  • Thread starter Thread starter gam197
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
RidgeSprinter answering for someone else (right here) . . .
He is Steve. whateverhislastnameis
She is Jill Biden.

So ergo

Probably because she to dignified to respond to it(the accusation)?
Yet I explicitly asked about the “he” regarding the Bidens.
 
Last edited:
40.png
gam197:
Aren’t these questions that should have asked and answered some time ago.
This husband appears not to have dealt emotionally with his wife’s infidelity
Yes, and you are assuming that these questions were not dealt with at the time of her marriage to Biden. Moreover, you are assuming that the priest who married Jill and Joe Biden did not do his do dilligence.
We do not have information to question the validity of the Biden’s marriage

If anything, I do agree that the ex-husband has issues. Should have managed them 50 years ago
Hypothetically as a Catholic if someone asked me about my marriage, I would say yes I got an annulment not a divorce or I would say the bishop looked at the marriage and decreed me a Petrine Privilege so I did not have to apply for an annulment.

I can fully understand the husband if this is true and again women do this. They see a better prospect, Joe being a Senator.
 
Last edited:
Hypothetically as a Catholic if someone asked me about my marriage, I would say yes I got an annulment not a divorce or I would say the bishop looked at the marriage and decreed me a Petrine Privilege so I did not have to apply for an annulment.
Hypothetically, myself as a Catholic. I would say. to another busybody Catholic. To mind their own business.
 
40.png
gam197:
Hypothetically as a Catholic if someone asked me about my marriage, I would say yes I got an annulment not a divorce or I would say the bishop looked at the marriage and decreed me a Petrine Privilege so I did not have to apply for an annulment.
Hypothetically, myself as a Catholic. I would say. to another busybody Catholic. To mind their own business.
They are not busybodies when it comes to political leaders. We can see that from all the dialogue on Melania.

Again it was the husband who brought this all up. He had had enough of the “Romantic” beginning.
 
Last edited:
They are not busybodies when it comes to political leaders. We can see that from all the dialogue on Melania
On the contrary, I do not question Melanias faith at all. In fact I thought the questioning of Melanias faith as she was visiting the Pope to be grossly uncharitable. And filled with assumptions about her that, I did not and will not participate in
 
40.png
gam197:
They are not busybodies when it comes to political leaders. We can see that from all the dialogue on Melania
On the contrary, I do not question Melanias faith at all. In fact I thought the questioning of Melanias faith as she was visiting the Pope to be grossly uncharitable. And filled with assumptions about her that, I did not and will not participate in
That is you but that is not the press and Melania has been maligned by the press over and over. Melania does not receive communion but she is constantly taken to task for her invalid marriage. . Jill Biden has been given a pass and there really was no reason to think otherwise. The story was that it was an innocent beginning to a lifelong marriage untill the first husband came forth and said, that is not what happened.

This raises questions.
“I don’t want to hurt anyone,” said Stevenson, now 72, who is working on a book that includes the lurid claim. “But facts are facts and what happened, happened.”
 
Last edited:
40.png
gam197:
This raises questions
Besides lurid gossip. What questions does it raise?
These are presidential candidates and it is not lurid gossip unless you are calling her husband a liar… The book will be forecoming so more facts will come out.

It raises the question on what kind of persons are Jill and Joe, somthing to think about in a presidential candidate.
 
Last edited:
it is not lurid gossip unless you are calling her husband a liar…
Someone is obviously lying, we just haven’t seen any evidence as to which person it is.
Why is it OK to call Dr. Biden a liar, but not her ex-husband?
 
40.png
gam197:
is not lurid gossip unless you are calling her husband a liar…
Someone is obviously lying, we just haven’t seen any evidence as to which person it is.
Why is it OK to call Dr. Biden a liar, but not her ex-husband?
I did not call Jill Biden a liar nor her husband but someone is not telling the truth. Why would a first husband want to even go back into this misery if it weren’t for anger. He’s 72, has money , why do this?

Again he voted for Obama and Biden twice.
 
Last edited:
Pretty sure the GOP abandoned the moral high ground when it ran Trump. Sorry – we’re now a country without any real resistance to adultery.
 
40.png
gam197:
I did not call Jill Biden a liar
Not outright. But your posts are clearly based on the premise that he’s the one telling the truth. Same thing.
Someone is not telling the truth. probably a mixture. He is writing a book for some reason and I don’t belive it is just about money. I am saying I would not be surprised if the story rings more toward the husbands storyline,.
 
Who cares??, we’re not electing a Pope, so you have a political choice, vote for a Democratic adulterer or a Republican adulterer, me, I’ll vote for Trump as I’m a Republican. His marriages, womanizing, adultery is between him and God, same with Biden, it’s who is best to run the country, not who has the most dirt on them.
 
Who cares??, we’re not electing a Pope, so you have a political choice, vote for a Democratic adulterer or a Republican adulterer, me, I’ll vote for Trump as I’m a Republican. His marriages, womanizing, adultery is between him and God, same with Biden, it’s who is best to run the country, not who has the most dirt on them.
The difference is one is claiming not to be. Everyday, it is is this great marriage and “love affair”., this moral high ground.
 
Last edited:
So what, it happened nearly fifty years ago, so they have stayed married ever since, it seems her ex husband has a happy marriage also. Do you know if they have or haven’t asked God for forgiveness for any past, or present sins, Jesus said “why do you look at the speck of sawdust in your brothers eye and not at the log in your own eye”
 
So what, it happened nearly fifty years ago, so they have stayed married ever since, it seems her ex husband has a happy marriage also. Do you know if they have or haven’t asked God for forgiveness for any past, or present sins, Jesus said “why do you look at the speck of sawdust in your brothers eye and not at the log in your own eye”
The issue has been brought up by her first husband. He is the one writing the book and he is the one wanting his “words” to be heard. I think he has a right to that. Maybe it is 43 years ago but I can understand his anger. The book will be forthcoming and as in all books, the author will be questioned.
 
Last edited:
So after 47 years, now his ex wifes husband is running for President he decided now might be an appropriate time to write a book and tell of the hurt and anger he felt, again, who cares, that was their business, what does it have to do with the 2020 Presidential election, diddly squat, apart from those who just want to keep digging up dirt. Anyhow there’s no point arguing over a nothing event so I bid you goodnight and God Bless
 
So after 47 years, now his ex wifes husband is running for President he decided now might be an appropriate time to write a book and tell of the hurt and anger he felt, again, who cares, that was their business, what does it have to do with the 2020 Presidential election, diddly squat, apart from those who just want to keep digging up dirt. Anyhow there’s no point arguing over a nothing event so I bid you goodnight and God Bless
It is not just about digging up dirt. The first husband has a right to tell his story. Why the delay, you will have to ask him and I am sure someone will.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top