F
FCS
Guest
I thought the point of the creation story that our ancestors sinned? I’m kind of confused.
Notwithstanding the lack of references to “surveys” to substantiate claims, 60% is a pretty significant majority (political candidates would salivate over garnering 60% of the votes in an election, and President Trump would be in ecstasy if "only "60% was closer to his approval rather than disapproval ratings were)…so, I’m not seeing what your point is.surveys on the subject indicate it’s only supported by 60% of blacks
I read multiple surveys that seemed to concur. Yes, her strategy is likely to garner primary votes and she’ll turn it off for the General election.Notwithstanding the lack of references to “surveys” to substantiate claims, 60% is a pretty significant majority (political candidates would salivate over garnering 60% of the votes in an election, and President Trump would be in ecstasy if 60% was closer to his approval rather than disapproval ratings were…so, I’m not seeing what your point is.
Again, without sources its kinda like saying, “Many people have told me”, and “the Generals have said”…just saying.I read multiple surveys that seemed to concur.
That is an excellent point. All decedents of Adam and Eve are to be blamed for slavery, and everything else, for that matter. We do all bear communal guilt. I just don’t see how this affects the reparation issue. Even in a court of law, deciding civil damages for one person, by one person, for one act, can be difficult. Deciding on communal damages for communal victims, passed down to for half a dozen generations, for a societal ill, is simply not possible.Literally none of my ancestors succumbed to the temptation of Satan in the Garden, yet my family has to pay for the disobedience of something someone else’s ancestors did because we look like them by being created in the same image of God? Was my baptism necessary?
newsone.com
Sure I include Fox, except they are distinct in that they are not decidedly biased in their news reporting. Their commentary tends conservative, but not their news reporting.JonNC:![]()
Does you definition of “MSM” include Fox, which clearly is also part of MSM?You don’t know what my approach is, other than what I’ve said. What I’ve said is I’ve learned not to trust the MSM because they’ve proven themselves to be the “Pravda” for the DNC.
I don’t trust any one source, which is why I bracket what I read and hear from numerous sources, even including Fox btw.
Now that is actually funny.Sure I include Fox, except they are distinct in that they are not decidedly biased in their news reporting.
The survey that Metis1 linked to at Business Insider was about the news, not the commentaries. As such it directly contradicts JonNC, who was also referring to the news departments of Fox News vs others.Metis1.
I went to that survey you linked to and immediately they had something concerning Sean Hannity.
I think ALL news outlets are biased.
But this survey you linked to, is not what JonNC referred to when discussing FoxNews lack of bias.
This survey is a comparison of proverbial apples to oranges (concerning what JonNC alluded to and FoxNews).
Go back and re-read what Jon had to say, and see if you understand why this survey is irrelevant to Jon’s point (irrespective of if you agree with JonNC or not).
.The survey that Metis1 linked to at Business Insider was about the news
LeafByNiggle . . .
This is a distinction without a difference. If people perceive a news organization as being biased, it is because of the biased reporting. What could it possibly mean to say that Fox News is seen as a biased news organization, but still puts out unbiased news? Similarly, how could PBS news reporting be perceived as biased if the PBS news organization was not perceived as biased? It’s the same thing!The survey that Metis1 linked to at Business Insider was about the news
It is NOT the “same thing” and anyone who watches FoxNews regularly has heard Sean Hannity (and others) personally state he is not doing journalism in that sense.It’s the same thing!
People know that Hannity is not a reporter, and that his program is not a news program. When people were asked to evaluate the bias of news reporting, they were evaluating the bias of news reporting, not the commentary department. PBS has a commentary department too (Shields and Brooks, and Amy Walters and Tamara Keith) but their commentary is also not part of the evaluation in the survey.It’s the same thing!
That was my whole point.People know that Hannity is not a reporter . . .
LeafByNiggle . . . .
That’s fine by me. People will read what we have written and draw their own conclusions.People know that Hannity is not a reporter . . .
Shepherd Smith? Brett Beier?JonNC:![]()
Now that is actually funny.Sure I include Fox, except they are distinct in that they are not decidedly biased in their news reporting.