B
Balto1
Guest
I’m glad for the people of Sweden that the government’s finally taking things seriously.I believe this thread title to be officially redundant.
I’m glad for the people of Sweden that the government’s finally taking things seriously.I believe this thread title to be officially redundant.
Bold mine.This clinical trial was conducted from April through June in Denmark, a largely unmasked area with government recommendations only to social distance and wash hands frequently as the country began to reopen in May. . . .
Yes, it’s been painful to watch the Swedish experiment and a relief that the government is moving on lockdowns now.Motherwit:
I’m glad for the people of Sweden that the government’s finally taking things seriously.I believe this thread title to be officially redundant.
You go back and re-read the thread and you will see that I said there would be a winter-effect.Meanwhile claims that Sweden is approaching zero deaths have been blown out of the water again today.
This may not be statistically significant.After a month, 42 of the mask-wearers in the study (1.8 percent) were infected with the virus while 53 of the non-mask-wearers (2.1. percent) were infected with the virus.” …
What about the Denmark experiment where they were not masking up either?Yes, it’s been painful to watch the Swedish experiment and a relief that the government is moving on lockdowns now.
They had to implement new restrictions after a massive increase in cases back in September.What about the Denmark experiment where they were not masking up either?
Are the Danes OK?
The death rise lags behind the case rise by 2 to 4 weeks which means by Christmas we’ll have seen the consequent spike in deaths.This chart shows both New Cases and Deaths, for both Sweden and Denmark. While cases are jumping in both countries, deaths are not.
So this OP of yours is essentially about your hopes/expectations that deaths will shoot up. But no evidence yet.The death rise lags behind the case rise by 2 to 4 weeks which means by Christmas we’ll have seen the consequent spike in deaths.
The lag between cases and deaths has been established many times over. There is no reason to think the workings of biology will suddenly change.Motherwit:
So this OP of yours is essentially about your hopes/expectations that deaths will shoot up. But no evidence yet.The death rise lags behind the case rise by 2 to 4 weeks which means by Christmas we’ll have seen the consequent spike in deaths.
Cases started jumping over 5 weeks ago.The death rise lags behind the case rise by 2 to 4 weeks which means by Christmas we’ll have seen the consequent spike in deaths.
That’s what I said. 2 to 4 weeks after infection a person will die. That explains the lag time.Motherwit:
Cases started jumping over 5 weeks ago.The death rise lags behind the case rise by 2 to 4 weeks which means by Christmas we’ll have seen the consequent spike in deaths.
The morbidity lag is about 2 weeks vs testing.
I don’t follow that logic? Who are you suggesting stay at for 2 weeks?Seems to be the virus is spreading in less vulnerable populations, these people just stay home for 2 weeks. What my family experienced
That’s the advice of medical professionals to most people testing positive.I don’t follow that logic? Who are you suggesting stay at for 2 weeks?
Maybe you should read the whole thread before putting that forward LeafByNiggle.The lag between cases and deaths has been established many times over.