J
JKirkLVNV
Guest
Spot on! Yes, the old Holy Father wasn’t perhaps as tight on some matters liturgical as he might have been, but I hardly think that the Servant of God, John Paul II, should be indicted for mercy and the abiding hope that people might realize the ridiculousness of some of this stuff. I don’t think he was neglectful and I don’t think he didn’t care.I dont really agree with all the tactics used by the SSPX, and not at all with those used by the Sedevacantist groups. But you all have to admit that if it wasnt for these Masses- rank with Liturgical abuse, innovations, and some honestly bizarre things- the SSPX and others wouldnt have any material to work with. They arent pulling their criticisms out of thin air.** This is quite undeniably true, Caesar. The trouble is many traditionalist sites (Traditio, the Remnant, Marian Horvat’s site, etc.) play fast and loose with the facts as regarding papal involvement or approval of these shenanigans. Do the SSPX chime in and say anthing along the lines of, “Well, this Mass where the Holy Father is pictured listening to a topless New Guinean woman read the Epistle is ACTUALLY the fault of the local bishops’ conference, so let’s not dump on HH toooo much?” No, my friend, they do not. **
And in regards to the Papal Masses at World Youth Day and other events, I was under the impression that it was the local organizers, not the Holy Father himself, who put togather these Masses. I have always found the Masses in Vatican City to be quite reverant, and from what I have heard that has increased since the election of Pope Benedict.