Mass, Mahony Style

  • Thread starter Thread starter paramedicgirl
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
I dont really agree with all the tactics used by the SSPX, and not at all with those used by the Sedevacantist groups. But you all have to admit that if it wasnt for these Masses- rank with Liturgical abuse, innovations, and some honestly bizarre things- the SSPX and others wouldnt have any material to work with. They arent pulling their criticisms out of thin air.** This is quite undeniably true, Caesar. The trouble is many traditionalist sites (Traditio, the Remnant, Marian Horvat’s site, etc.) play fast and loose with the facts as regarding papal involvement or approval of these shenanigans. Do the SSPX chime in and say anthing along the lines of, “Well, this Mass where the Holy Father is pictured listening to a topless New Guinean woman read the Epistle is ACTUALLY the fault of the local bishops’ conference, so let’s not dump on HH toooo much?” No, my friend, they do not. **

And in regards to the Papal Masses at World Youth Day and other events, I was under the impression that it was the local organizers, not the Holy Father himself, who put togather these Masses. I have always found the Masses in Vatican City to be quite reverant, and from what I have heard that has increased since the election of Pope Benedict.
Spot on! Yes, the old Holy Father wasn’t perhaps as tight on some matters liturgical as he might have been, but I hardly think that the Servant of God, John Paul II, should be indicted for mercy and the abiding hope that people might realize the ridiculousness of some of this stuff. I don’t think he was neglectful and I don’t think he didn’t care.
 
This is quite undeniably true, Caesar. The trouble is many traditionalist sites (Traditio, the Remnant, Marian Horvat’s site, etc.) play fast and loose with the facts as regarding papal involvement or approval of these shenanigans. Do the SSPX chime in and say anthing along the lines of, “Well, this Mass where the Holy Father is pictured listening to a topless New Guinean woman read the Epistle is ACTUALLY the fault of the local bishops’ conference, so let’s not dump on HH toooo much?” No, my friend, they do not.
Some of those sites can hardly be called “Catholic”- they are radicals on the fringe of the traditionalist movement, many being Sedevacantist. I dont see the websites for the ICRSS or Una Voce plastering pictures of liturgical abuses all over their sites, screaming that the Holy Father is a heretic.

As for the SSPX, well they dont chime in because they are too political- dont want to break too many ties with Rome, yet dont want to loose anything with the real radicals either.
Spot on! Yes, the old Holy Father wasn’t perhaps as tight on some matters liturgical as he might have been, but I hardly think that the Servant of God, John Paul II, should be indicted for mercy and the abiding hope that people might realize the ridiculousness of some of this stuff. I don’t think he was neglectful and I don’t think he didn’t care.
John Paul II was a very holy man, but he tried too hard to appease everyone and ended up making some unfortunate concessions to do so. He also neglected some of the more adminstrative facets of his Holy Office (such as the appointment of Bishops…), especialy early on in his Papacy.
 
Well, you are both wrong. The motivation to post this video had to do with the interest I knew it would generate, and I have posted a list of Vatican contacts on my blog so that people who don’t like what is happening in the video can contact the Vatican and express their concerns to get these liturgical abuses stopped. It is Masses like these that give the Novus Ordo a bad name.

Sorry guys, but it really has nothing to do with a side by side comparison of the TLM.
Good for you. 🙂
 
Read before you post is one of my mottos Paramedic Girl. Another one is read what I posted, not what you think I posted. I get a lot of that too.

You’re absolutely right not only to post this, but also to give information on who to contact in the Vatican.

Anti-Tridentine posters get very defensive when you show abuses in the Novus Ordo Mass.
Why are you Anti-Tridentine?
 
Some of those sites can hardly be called “Catholic”- they are radicals on the fringe of the traditionalist movement, many being Sedevacantist. I dont see the websites for the ICRSS or Una Voce plastering pictures of liturgical abuses all over their sites, screaming that the Holy Father is a heretic.

As for the SSPX, well they dont chime in because they are too political- dont want to break too many ties with Rome, yet dont want to loose anything with the real radicals either.

John Paul II was a very holy man, but he tried too hard to appease everyone and ended up making some unfortunate concessions to do so. He also neglected some of the more adminstrative facets of his Holy Office (such as the appointment of Bishops…), especialy early on in his Papacy.
We’ll have to disagree on the appeasin’ and the appointin’ (as for the latter, check out how the Holy Father actually does appoint bishops. Like the making of sausage, I’m not sure I would want to be witness to it).
 
It makes everyone aware of the situation.

The negative comments are only natural because, well, the video has a negative air about it.

I think whenever there is abuse on this scale, every Catholic on the face of the Earth should see it so that they can complain and get something done about it.
I agree…complain to get something done.
 
So it would be ok to deny Matthew 25 ministries (does anyone know what that is?) and instead build a 100 million plus dollar cathedral while an existing cathedral already, well, existed?
There are lots of poor people in this country and throughout the world. 100 million dollars could have vaccinated thousands, gave clean drinking water to thousands, fed thousands, and so on. They even charge you 8 or 9 bucks to park in the garage. It’s insanity. I’m sorry not saying this because it would hurt someone’s pride they have in a building and the vatican, but because it is the truth, the truth hurts. Buildings come and go.
We are the Body of Christ, we are the church. We need to take care of our brethren before we build a 100 million plus building.
Right…I don’t think God cares about buildings.
 
Anti-Tridentine posters get very defensive when you show abuses in the Novus Ordo Mass.
Will the “anti-Tridentiners” please stand up? Really, are there any here?
 
With the advent of You Tube, these liturgical abuses can now be witnessed by anyone, all they need is an internet connection.

I believe the L.A. Archdiocese is in some sort of material schism, certainly heresy, however not yet officially or canonically. Either Rome is in denial, or they recognize the problems there as being so massive and deep that they aren’t sure what to do.
 
I take it you mean disobedient.
Actually I was referring to nc’s position that people outside the Church were watching what’s going on inside the Church.

I don’t know if I can call those that have never thought about becoming Catholics “disobedient.”
 
This is part of its ugliness:
http://i27.photobucket.com/albums/c156/paramedicgirl/OurladyofAngelsBronzeimage.jpg
To see what else sculptor Robert Graham created go here
I think this one’s my favorite:
(Please Note: This uploaded content is no longer available.)

Nothing quite like going out for a nice drive and seeing a huge steaming pile in a pedestal.

“Yeah, go straight down this road, and hang a left at the doggy-doo. Can’t miss it.”

I’m amazed he could sculpt anything other than naked women. Seriously… It’s creepy… Almost every single sculpture…
 
Code:
  			Originally Posted by **JKirkLVNV** 					[forums.catholic-questions.org/images/buttons_cak/viewpost.gif](http://forums.catholic-questions.org/showthread.php?p=1984371#post1984371) 				
  		*This is quite undeniably true, Caesar. The trouble is many traditionalist sites (Traditio, the Remnant, Marian Horvat's site, etc.) play fast and loose with the facts as regarding papal involvement or approval of these shenanigans. Do the SSPX chime in and say anthing along the lines of, "Well, this Mass where the Holy Father is pictured listening to a topless New Guinean woman read the Epistle is ACTUALLY the fault of the local bishops' conference, so let's not dump on HH toooo much?" No, my friend, they do not.*
JKirk;
What you say is certainly true, but consider to yourself why the local bishops would think the Pope would approve.

Suppose you worked for a national firm and your boss was coming to Las Vegas to check up on you and how you were running your division. Your boss was known to be easy going, but also known as pretty much a straight arrow–not tolerating off color jokes or sexual innuendo. So would you plan to take your boss to dinner that had a topless revue? Or even to a show that featured some dirty mouthed comedian that was known to revel in shocking the yokels from the Midwest? Somehow, I think you would find ways to show your boss a good time without insulting his sensibilities.

So no, the Pope may not be responsible for what the local organizers do, but with strong leadership by the Pope, the local organizers would know the Pope would not approve of what they had planned. Maybe Pope John Paul II should have thrown a public tizzy so in the future he would not be subjected to such silliness.

I suppose the Pope is like a quarterback, to much credit is given for a touchdown pass and too much blame for the interception even though the receiver ran the wrong route.
http://www.answers.com/main/images/aNorthEast.gif http://www.answers.com/main/images/cLeftTop.gif http://www.answers.com/main/images/cRightTop.gif
http://www.answers.com/main/images/cLeftBottom.gif http://www.answers.com/main/images/cRightBottom.gif
 
JKirk;
What you say is certainly true, but consider to yourself why the local bishops would think the Pope would approve.

Suppose you worked for a national firm and your boss was coming to Las Vegas to check up on you and how you were running your division. Your boss was known to be easy going, but also known as pretty much a straight arrow–not tolerating off color jokes or sexual innuendo. So would you plan to take your boss to dinner that had a topless revue? Or even to a show that featured some dirty mouthed comedian that was known to revel in shocking the yokels from the Midwest? Somehow, I think you would find ways to show your boss a good time without insulting his sensibilities.

So no, the Pope may not be responsible for what the local organizers do, but with strong leadership by the Pope, the local organizers would know the Pope would not approve of what they had planned. Maybe Pope John Paul II should have thrown a public tizzy so in the future he would not be subjected to such silliness.

I suppose the Pope is like a quarterback, to much credit is given for a touchdown pass and too much blame for the interception even though the receiver ran the wrong route.
http://www.answers.com/main/images/aNorthEast.gif http://www.answers.com/main/images/cLeftTop.gif http://www.answers.com/main/images/cRightTop.gif

http://www.answers.com/main/images/cLeftBottom.gif http://www.answers.com/main/images/cRightBottom.gif
I think running the Church, governing and shepherding the Church, is a LOT more complicated than that. Bishops hold apostolic office themselves, they’re not SIMPLY the pope’s area managers. Yeah, some of them are apparently a little wing-nutty, but pragmatically, he has to be cautious about throwing his weight around. People keep wanting Pope Benedict to DO something, ANYTHING. If it was just simply a matter of calling the shots and expecting results immediately, I doubt that there would a better man for the job that Joseph Ratzinger (and there isn’t a better man for the job, or the Holy Spirit would have picked HIM. That there is something more to the job than that can (I think) be seen in the fact that he’s NOT simply yelling into a bull horn outside the LA cathedral,“Hey, Roger, you and your cronies, genuflect on out here toot suite! Don’t make me come in there!”

And if getting good bishops is easy, I wish someone would explain to me HOW it comes to pass that the Servant of God, John Paul II, picked both Cardinal Mahony and Archbishop Burke, Bishop Bruskewitz (sp) and Bishop Graham of Dallas.
And Pope Benedict’s original pick for the Archdiocese of Warsaw just ran into a bit of trouble. The Holy See may well not have had insdisputable proof of his “problem,” but you can’t make me believe that little rumors hadn’t been blowing on the wind.

As a friend of mine said years ago, when JPII first started having health problems, being pope “is a tough gig, especially for an old dude.”
 
:confused: Does anyone have some good ideas on how to approach the Principal of my children’s Catholic school on this matter. I know they are all required to go to this conference and it makes my stomach sick. This conference and everything there now trickles down to my children. I want to handle it tactfully so I don’t come off like the “bull in a china shop” that I really want to be. It will only make her defensive.

When it comes to the children we all must be proactive and try to put an end to this heresy!!!
 
:confused: Does anyone have some good ideas on how to approach the Principal of my children’s Catholic school on this matter. I know they are all required to go to this conference and it makes my stomach sick. This conference and everything there now trickles down to my children. I want to handle it tactfully so I don’t come off like the “bull in a china shop” that I really want to be. It will only make her defensive.

When it comes to the children we all must be proactive and try to put an end to this heresy!!!
Just Google all the speakers and find out what type of heresy they have been preaching (others have done that and it’s amazing what they came up with), and then stand your ground and tell the principal you won’t expose your child to such heresy. Just take him out of school for the conference and have him write an essay instead on the saints or some other Catholic subject.
 
Just Google all the speakers and find out what type of heresy they have been preaching (others have done that and it’s amazing what they came up with), and then stand your ground and tell the principal you won’t expose your child to such heresy. Just take him out of school for the conference and have him write an essay instead on the saints or some other Catholic subject.
If the list of speakers (there may be some good ones mixed in, I dunno, I’m so flummoxed by the ONE name that stands out from the rest, for me at least) doesn’t frighten a priest, then that priest needs to be educated as to what is and isn’t heresy.
 
QUOTE=Unitas;1984756]I think this one’s my favorite:
(Please Note: This uploaded content is no longer available.)

Nothing quite like going out for a nice drive and seeing a huge steaming pile in a pedestal.

“Yeah, go straight down this road, and hang a left at the doggy-doo. Can’t miss it.”

I’m amazed he could sculpt anything other than naked women. Seriously… It’s creepy… Almost every single sculpture…

Its the Blob

http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/d/df/The_Blob_poster.jpg/200px-The_Blob_poster.jpg

.
 
It looks like an alien from those 50 movies.
I actually saw this, last month, when I was in San Jose at a conference (my hotel was further to the left than this picture and I walked by it everyday). Truth to tell, it isn’t badly done and it is(partially) representative of Meso-American culture. I think the point is that it wouldn’t be appropriate in a church setting and that, sadly, neither is his Lady of the Angels statue (Our Lady of the Romulans, more like).

There are modern representations of Christ, the Blessed Mother, and the saints that are quite beautiful (I’ll look for links). His just isn’t.

What do people think of the doors under Our Lady of the Romulans? I don’t think those were badly done.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top