G
Gab123
Guest
I never said open borders.Anyone who advocates a mass influx of tens of millions of low skill workers is pushing a nirvana open borders agenda and doesn’t have sympathies with the poor in their neighborhood.
I never said open borders.Anyone who advocates a mass influx of tens of millions of low skill workers is pushing a nirvana open borders agenda and doesn’t have sympathies with the poor in their neighborhood.
No you didn’t use that phrase,I never said open borders.
Again; build the wall, but streamline the green card process for workers. You can always pass a law that gives priority to citizens. And from a spiritual perspective, I would suggest you stop looking at the world through the eyes of the world, and look at the world through the eyes of a pilgrim. Your existence on this planet is going to come to an end before you know it, and you can’t take anything with you; that house, those shoes those clothes are some day going to be used and worn by another person once you’re buried and gone; you’re just passing through. If you can help people who are struggling to survive, then by all means help. I was a stranger and you welcomed me.but the changes you are pushing are in line with those from the open borders movement…
Obviously not everyone is struggling. only a small percentage of people sacrifice everything to become an immigrant; In a given city a person can be rich and enjoying comfort and security while a mile away there are people that are hopeless.The cost of living is significantly lower, the people are thriving, some are even fat like us in america.
Democrats have to keep the base on the political plantation so to speak.dead set against having low unemployment among our most vulnerable minority population?
You are spouting ‘open borders’ talking points, and what do you mean by passing a law giving citizens priority? That sounds like discrimination, that you think it’s OK if we have a citizen class and a slave class.Again; build the wall, but streamline the green card process for workers. You can always pass a law that gives priority to citizens. And from a spiritual perspective, I would suggest you stop looking at the world through the eyes of the world, and look at the world through the eyes of a pilgrim. Your existence on this planet is going to come to an end before you know it, and you can’t take anything with you; that house, those shoes those clothes are some day going to be used and worn by another person once you’re buried and gone; you’re just passing through. If you can help people who are struggling to survive, then by all means help. I was a stranger and you welcomed me.
This description applies to every major city in the world, including the USA.In a given city a person can be rich and enjoying comfort and security while a mile away there are people that are hopeless.
The problem of illegal immigrants is here and now. These are real men women and children, not stray dogs. So the question is what does the Church say about how to deal with people that are here illegally already, and have been here for a long time. It sounds like you simply want to round up everyone and simply push them on on curve on the other side of the border, something the Church is against, the vicar of Christ is against, and the Bible itself is against. So you can either go with what the Bible says or with what you want.You should read up on the church teachings on subsidiarity, your primary focus should be local rather than you fixing global problems
I am aware of this principle, thus the cquestion. Again to you is, how do we locally deal with the problem of illegal immigrants in your local community. You seem to say arrest them and toss them out; I ‘m simply saying, let’s treat them like human beings; many of them only have what they built here and-s have families and children that all they know us the good ol’ U.S.A.You should read up on the church teachings on subsidiarity
I responded to you about 10 posts ago; you must have missed it.I repeat, what actual experience do you have living in the countries
What does this mean? And How do you deport somebody that has been here for 20 years and has a family; and what about illegals who were brought here as children 30 years ago?Deporting them with dignity is not against Church doctrine.
Not rearly sure what you don’t understand, haven’t you moved before?What does this mean? And How do you deport somebody that has been here for 20 years and has a family; and what about illegals who were brought here as children 30 years ago?
I don’t think people should simply be uprooted and thrown out. And I think your stance is not feasible or possible in the current political climate. I think deporting criminals is a must; but there are too many people like me who are willing to find a better solution for people who have been here simply seeking a better life, and especially those who were brought into this country illegally as children.Not rearly sure what you don’t understand, haven’t you moved before?
A simple deportation order should work in most instances.
But not in Mexico.The Migrant is a gift