Muslins and the BVM

  • Thread starter Thread starter Luvtosew
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
Once again, if you deny the Trinity, you are NOT worshipping the same God. Also, with regard to the Holy Spirit, Pentecost would mean NOTHING to the practicing Jews and Muslims and any other religion that denys the Trinitarian God we worship. If Jesus is not the Messiah, then Him sending the “Helper” (Holy Spirit)(John 14:15-31 and 16:5-15) means nothing. Just because Jews and Muslims believe Jesus (and Abraham as well) existed, doesn’t meant they are worshipping the True God. That is ridiculous. Paul talks about this in Romans (4) as well as his letters to the Galatians. And Christ is always telling the Pharisees and Sadducees that just because they are circumcised doesn’t mean they are saved.

Islam rejects the Trinitarian Christian view that Jesus was God incarnate or the son of God, that he was ever crucified or resurrected, or that he ever atoned for the sins of mankind. The Quran says that Jesus himself never claimed any of these things, and it furthermore indicates that Jesus will deny having ever claimed divinity at the Last Judgment, and God will vindicate him.

It’s pretty obvious that Muslims do not worship the same God if this is what the Quran says. All of these “truths” about Christ that the Muslims believe can be refuted by reading Christ’s own words in the Bible, “I Am the RESURRECTION and the Life.” and various other verses… being as Jesus while on the cross said seven phrases, I think it’s safe to say He was crucified and acknowledged His Crucifixion…See verse above regarding Trinity … regarding atonement for sins, oh for crying out loud,😃 they need to read the New Testament, as well as the Old. That’s the entire theme of the Bible! 😉
But would you say that the Jewish people worshipped one God (who they believed to be unitarian) before the coming of Christ, and have worshipped another, false god (who they still believe to be unitarian) since his ascension? :confused:
 
But would you say that the Jewish people worshipped one God (who they believed to be unitarian) before the coming of Christ, and have worshipped another, false god (who they still believe to be unitarian) since his ascension? :confused:
Right, comes back to this point. I believe all have the Triune aspect clearly understood. So how does a Christian state Judaism is indeed worshipping God the Father, [course they do not accept Jesus-Messiah.]

Yet conclude Islam is not because they claim Jesus is a Prophet?

There’s still but One-God…Right?

So then who are we assigning say Orthodox Jewish worship to…God the Father? Of course.

So then who are we assigning Islamic worship to if not God the Father? And more important why?
 
Right, comes back to this point. I believe all have the Triune aspect clearly understood. So how does a Christian state Judaism is indeed worshipping God the Father, [course they do not accept Jesus-Messiah.]

Yet conclude Islam is not because they claim Jesus is a Prophet?

There’s still but One-God…Right?

So then who are we assigning say Orthodox Jewish worship to…God the Father? Of course.

So then who are we assigning Islamic worship to if not God the Father? And more important why?
I suppose we have no problem with the Jews worshipping the same God as us since both are using the same Scripture (the OT). Since we still accept the OT as part of the Bible hence everything contains therein is the truth. Since the Jews are using the OT, we accept that they do have the truth up to that level.

As for Islam, it is more problematic. On the whole it does not accept both the OT and the NT except for the claim of some similarities but contradiction on where it really counts. I believe most Catholics find it difficult to reconcile Islam rejecting Jesus’ death and resurrection and yet worshipping the same God as us, except for the fact that we are duty bound to accept the CCC 841. And that’s actually scratching a surface based on the fact that Muslims acknowledging the God of Creation which we also do, and as to what that God is, we are very much opposing each other.

The CCC 841 seems to be more of trying to be politically correct especially in an era where we cannot simply dismiss the overwhelming presence of Muslims in our midst. I would say for those Catholics who find CCC 841 to be problematic, it may be a consolation that it is trying to be as short as possible thus avoiding of being dragged into bigger controversy.

841 The Church’s relationship with the Muslims. “The plan of salvation also includes those who acknowledge the Creator, in the first place amongst whom are the Muslims; these profess to hold the faith of Abraham, and together with us they adore the one, merciful God, mankind’s judge on the last day.”
 
Alawite’s[Syria] venerate her though I don’t know exactly how.

Immaculate Conception is in the Quran though I believe its understood differently. Wonder where Mohammad came upon that teaching. 🤷
Hmm, does sound familiar. I am having more trouble explaining immaculate conception to my christian brothers and sisters!
 
I suppose we have no problem with the Jews worshipping the same God as us since both are using the same Scripture (the OT). Since we still accept the OT as part of the Bible hence everything contains therein is the truth. Since the Jews are using the OT, we accept that they do have the truth up to that level.
Well the Covenant with Abraham was also with God to Himself, so it still stands. While Islam differs with Isaac, its then an imperfect understanding IMHO. Cousre I may be wrong here. Yet it still reflects the God of Abraham.
As for Islam, it is more problematic. On the whole it does not accept both the OT and the NT except for the claim of some similarities but contradiction on where it really counts. I believe most Catholics find it difficult to reconcile Islam rejecting Jesus’ death and resurrection and yet worshipping the same God as us, except for the fact that we are duty bound to accept the CCC 841. And that’s actually scratching a surface based on the fact that Muslims acknowledging the God of Creation which we also do, and as to what that God is, we are very much opposing each other.
Orthodox Jews do no accept the NT either, Islam sees Mohammad as the Last Prophet thus their issue with the OT in general. But rejecting Jesus in Judaism and Islam would be in essense an area of disagreement with both towards Christianity? Yet we don’t view Judaism as we do Islam by large and in particular on many threads here.

Not what or who that God is, since there is but one God the Father, the issue resides in disageements over Jesus as Christ in both Islam and Judaism. No?
The CCC 841 seems to be more of trying to be politically correct especially in an era where we cannot simply dismiss the overwhelming presence of Muslims in our midst. I would say for those Catholics who find CCC 841 to be problematic, it may be a consolation that it is trying to be as short as possible thus avoiding of being dragged into bigger controversy.
Right I see the ecumenical aspect of this in light of the Apostolic Churchs view of Islam from early on, thus it was viewed as heresy. Also the area of dialogue with Judaism has changed greatly since JP-II.
841 The Church’s relationship with the Muslims. “The plan of salvation also includes those who acknowledge the Creator, in the first place amongst whom are the Muslims; these profess to hold the faith of Abraham, and together with us they adore the one, merciful God, mankind’s judge on the last day.”
Right the key word is “profess” then from there what I touched on with Abraham and earlier with the assigned attributes of God thus Allah.

Its not hard to see aspects of other religions in this same light, such as JWs etc. The question then arrives in how do we correctly view these religions so dialogue can be available where open minds are to acheive peace if this is or ever was possible. I have my doubts. This is a two way street which leads back to Islam.

In other words if we say for example, JWs have a corrupt understanding of scripture, and claim “heresy” straight out of the lake of fire. Where does this leave the option of life together? And in particular with Islam which compounds the issue in its strident radical aspect.

IMHO these Good Muslims we talk about? They too are responsible to bring peace love and unity to Islam, so Islam can live among all countries and religions. The idea of world-wide Allah converstion is folly and a path to destruction as we see with the implosion of the middle east. Thus then Islam claims “radical aspects” not coonected or in line with the larger teaching, then Islam is responsible for dealing with “their issue” thus correct teaching. This I do not see “at all”. In fact I see just the opposite, and in the imperfect understanding of God. Which again complicates by understanding the essense of God the Father.

Which cannot be based of a idea of forced conversaion, violence, hate, God Deceives to obtain a desired goal of an Islamic world which will continue to lead to War etc etc. Thus while one may not accept Jesus Christ as savior, they certainly must understand the correct essense of God the Father or Allah. And certainly must come to a mutual understanding in this nuclear time, that will be no world Allah. Do you see their neighbor China embracing this?

Perhaps its me, I see many half-truths which lead to a lack of compassion, thus love, this misunderstanding I don’t see with Orthodox Judaism. I certainly don’t see Judaism as seeking world control. I also do not see an Islamic country which embraces Freedom of Religion to any degree but “tolerence” not that this uncommon for Christains in many areas worldwide.

Peace
 
**The CCC 841 seems to be more of trying to be politically correct especially in an era where we cannot simply dismiss the overwhelming presence of Muslims in our midst. I would say for those Catholics who find CCC 841 to be problematic, it may be a consolation that it is trying to be as short as possible thus avoiding of being dragged into bigger controversy.

841 The Church’s relationship with the Muslims. “The plan of salvation also includes those who acknowledge the Creator, in the first place amongst whom are the Muslims; these profess to hold the faith of Abraham, and together with us they adore the one, merciful God, mankind’s judge on the last day.”**

Yes I’m sure they were tying to politically correct, or to keep PEACE, but the fact remains its a double message, where we need to believe in Jesus death and resurrection to be saved, isn’t tht what what the Eucharist is all about, Holy Communion in a Christian Church, to proclaim the death of Jesus till he comes. Now the Muslins don’t believe Jesus is our Lord and Saviour, so where does that leave us?? I never read the Quran or studied much about Islam, but I can watch the news and we have our men over there fighting WHO? they are still be wounded and dying everyday.

I was astounded coming across that video, that I posted a link to, as that is not the Mary of our Bible, nor is that the Jesus of our Bible, so their God cant be the God of our Bible either, right or wrong, even so all of our Christian faith depends on Jesus as our Lord and Saviour and here we get it in our CCC that one doesn’t have to believe. Needless to say this is a bit upsetting. I read that Muhammed took stories from Jewish people and heretic Christians and made up his own religion. I fear too many people might be turning a blind eye to the radical Muslins, and trying to appease them, well thats find and dandy, until they strike again. I don’t know, the Muslin is 1 billion strong, same as the RCC 1 billion strong. I do believe I read the Muslin pop. is growning more swiftly. Theres of course a lot of stuff one the web, one has to be careful what they read. I do wish some Muslins on this site would chime in here to give us their point of view.

It would be wonderful if we could all live together in peace, but as we know radical islam in not peaceful.

Gary Taylor I didn’t read your post, we were writing at the same time, just so you know that.
 
Its not hard to see aspects of other religions in this same light, such as JWs etc. The question then arrives in how do we correctly view these religions so dialogue can be available where open minds are to acheive peace if this is or ever was possible. I have my doubts. This is a two way street which leads back to Islam.

In other words if we say for example, JWs have a corrupt understanding of scripture, and claim “heresy” straight out of the lake of fire. Where does this leave the option of life together? And in particular with Islam which compounds the issue in its strident radical aspect.

IMHO these Good Muslims we talk about? They too are responsible to bring peace love and unity to Islam, so Islam can live among all countries and religions. The idea of world-wide Allah converstion is folly and a path to destruction as we see with the implosion of the middle east. Thus then Islam claims “radical aspects” not coonected or in line with the larger teaching, then Islam is responsible for dealing with “their issue” thus correct teaching. This I do not see “at all”. In fact I see just the opposite, and in the imperfect understanding of God. Which again complicates by understanding the essense of God the Father.

Which cannot be based of a idea of forced conversaion, violence, hate, God Deceives to obtain a desired goal of an Islamic world which will continue to lead to War etc etc. Thus while one may not accept Jesus Christ as savior, they certainly must understand the correct essense of God the Father or Allah. And certainly must come to a mutual understanding in this nuclear time, that will be no world Allah. Do you see their neighbor China embracing this?
What Christians should be doing vis-à-vis Muslims and Jehovah’s Witnesses is to evangelize them. Christianity and Islam are religious giants today, mutual adversaries that can never be placated. Christianity and the Jehovah’s Witnesses sect are like estranged third cousins, also mutual adversaries that can never be mollified.
 
What Christians should be doing vis-à-vis Muslims and Jehovah’s Witnesses is to evangelize them. Christianity and Islam are religious giants today, mutual adversaries that can never be placated. Christianity and the Jehovah’s Witnesses sect are like estranged third cousins, also mutual adversaries that can never be mollified.
We need a better approach to this Trebor, on-line is terrible yet a good second source. Were lacking inter-personal relationships for this purpose, in particular in the middle east. And a willingness for example with JWs to even entertain this idea. I totally agree with you.

Its easy to say, we can dialogue with muslims in the USA since there are “Good Muslims” and I say Amen. Yet where does Islam open the doors for religious freedom, equality, and open religious dialogue in Islamic Countries? Further complicates.

People coming from other countries and being Americanized is a very old reality. And that will happen with Islam, if we can undermine the World Allah mind set.

Other religious ideas will always exist, always have, domination is a concern with this mindset, as it is also not to distract further, but with Socialism thus Communisms baby sister.
 
Orthodox Jews do no accept the NT either, Islam sees Mohammad as the Last Prophet thus their issue with the OT in general. But rejecting Jesus in Judaism and Islam would be in essense an area of disagreement with both towards Christianity? Yet we don’t view Judaism as we do Islam by large and in particular on many threads here.

Not what or who that God is, since there is but one God the Father, the issue resides in disageements over Jesus as Christ in both Islam and Judaism. No?
I can understand your argument. Like I said, it is easier for Christians to accept that the Jews and we are worshipping the same God in view of the covenant. The Jews simply stop at the OT, a Scripture that we use too.

The NT is not part of their Scripture hence the issue of Jesus as the Messiah does not arise for them. In other word, they had not moved on after the OT.

However it is a bit different in Islam. The rejection of Jesus is in the Quran and thus it is their official teaching, written in black and white that Jesus is not the second person of the Trinity and that he did not die or rose again.

The difference could be, if we recognize this distinction, is that Islam rejects Jesus whilst the Jews do not know Jesus. To say that the Jews are not worshipping the same God as us would mean to reject the OT which the Jews based their belief on. OTOH, to say that Islam teaches in worshipping the same God as us means for us to reject the NT, which Islam contradicts and says it is a lie.
IMHO these Good Muslims we talk about? They too are responsible to bring peace love and unity to Islam, so Islam can live among all countries and religions. The idea of world-wide Allah converstion is folly and a path to destruction as we see with the implosion of the middle east. Thus then Islam claims “radical aspects” not coonected or in line with the larger teaching, then Islam is responsible for dealing with “their issue” thus correct teaching. This I do not see “at all”. In fact I see just the opposite, and in the imperfect understanding of God. Which again complicates by understanding the essense of God the Father.

Which cannot be based of a idea of forced conversaion, violence, hate, God Deceives to obtain a desired goal of an Islamic world which will continue to lead to War etc etc. Thus while one may not accept Jesus Christ as savior, they certainly must understand the correct essense of God the Father or Allah. And certainly must come to a mutual understanding in this nuclear time, that will be no world Allah. Do you see their neighbor China embracing this?

Perhaps its me, I see many half-truths which lead to a lack of compassion, thus love, this misunderstanding I don’t see with Orthodox Judaism. I certainly don’t see Judaism as seeking world control. I also do not see an Islamic country which embraces Freedom of Religion to any degree but “tolerence” not that this uncommon for Christains in many areas worldwide.
Peace
I would not comment on how the religion Islam would affect the state of the world that is to come without being sounded biased. Suffice to say here that there are many good Muslims who want peace as much as us or vice versa. Therefore the issue is not Muslims but the religion per se.

I tend to agree, though I need to find out more, that Islam having denied the divinity, death and resurrection of Jesus, has put it in the category of those who deny exactly that, and that could only be the anti-thesis of Christ and not of God. On the basis of what the Bible says, the only people who have vested interest in propagating that Jesus did not die, are not from God but the Evil One because the effect of this action is to undo what Christ has done.

Peace.
 
**The CCC 841 seems to be more of trying to be politically correct especially in an era where we cannot simply dismiss the overwhelming presence of Muslims in our midst. I would say for those Catholics who find CCC 841 to be problematic, it may be a consolation that it is trying to be as short as possible thus avoiding of being dragged into bigger controversy.

841 The Church’s relationship with the Muslims. “The plan of salvation also includes those who acknowledge the Creator, in the first place amongst whom are the Muslims; these profess to hold the faith of Abraham, and together with us they adore the one, merciful God, mankind’s judge on the last day.”**

Yes I’m sure they were tying to politically correct, or to keep PEACE, but the fact remains its a double message, where we need to believe in Jesus death and resurrection to be saved, isn’t tht what what the Eucharist is all about, Holy Communion in a Christian Church, to proclaim the death of Jesus till he comes. Now the Muslins don’t believe Jesus is our Lord and Saviour, so where does that leave us?? I never read the Quran or studied much about Islam, but I can watch the news and we have our men over there fighting WHO? they are still be wounded and dying everyday.

I was astounded coming across that video, that I posted a link to, as that is not the Mary of our Bible, nor is that the Jesus of our Bible, so their God cant be the God of our Bible either, right or wrong, even so all of our Christian faith depends on Jesus as our Lord and Saviour and here we get it in our CCC that one doesn’t have to believe. Needless to say this is a bit upsetting. I read that Muhammed took stories from Jewish people and heretic Christians and made up his own religion. I fear too many people might be turning a blind eye to the radical Muslins, and trying to appease them, well thats find and dandy, until they strike again. I don’t know, the Muslin is 1 billion strong, same as the RCC 1 billion strong. I do believe I read the Muslin pop. is growning more swiftly. Theres of course a lot of stuff one the web, one has to be careful what they read. I do wish some Muslins on this site would chime in here to give us their point of view.

It would be wonderful if we could all live together in peace, but as we know radical islam in not peaceful.

Gary Taylor I didn’t read your post, we were writing at the same time, just so you know that.
Basically all true Sis. I know its hard to reconcile any of this in the mind of one who thinks and lives Christ and His Love. Its a severe break from that truth. And I do believe aspects of pure evil exist within Islam.

The basis though is we all believe there is but one God. Lucifer is a fallen Arch Angel be it powerful, not a God.

Yet when we say God the Father here is where all must agree, since he is God. The firm conviction of Islam is God of Abraham thus through his son Ishmael and his descendants thus they make their claim.

Course their unsightly and clearly disturbing thus defective understanding of Gods true nature is obvious. This comes not from a non belief in God the father, but through a man-made history based on Mohammads “private revelation” for lack of a better word, probably his own illusion is more accurate. Which IMHO was recorded while he controlled an Army, so it not hard to figure those appauling verse’s were jotted down in the midst of War to some extent.

So two issues reside, one being where there is common ground be it little and complex and fought with difficulty, and the next being that we are also responsible in charity to point out the areas where we differ and which are very grave.

Peace
 
The NT is not part of their Scripture hence the issue of Jesus as the Messiah does not arise for them. In other word, they had not moved on after the OT.

I don’t have time to post much but have read these posts, but isn’t this the same thing Jesus said to the Jews that they didn’t know Scripture or they would of known him. Of course they say that he is not the Messiah talked about in the OT, they are still waiting. Well its been over 2000 years so I dont know what they are waiting for.(ha ha).

I never hear anything about Jewish terrorist, but even in China where there are over 2 million Muslins they are having terrorist attacks, and I don’t think China is going to put up with much.

I firmly believe anyone who doesnt’ think radical Islam is a treat to the US is sadly mistaken, and like one poster said , why are not the peaceful Muslins here speaking up against the radical Muslins. I don’t feel Islam is sitting on its heels doing nothing, although they want us to believe that. They have Iraq now, and we got it for them, how nice of us.

Maybe China and Islam will go to war, but war in coming whether we like it or not, well were in war, just not declared.
 
The difference could be, if we recognize this distinction, is that Islam rejects Jesus whilst the Jews do not know Jesus.
The Jews knew exactly who Jesus was and rejected him as the Messiah. In fact they didn’t want King of the Jews on the Cross which Pilate nailed up, because they did not believe this. Google “Rejection of Jesus” its all through the NT.

Right Islam rejects Jesus was God incarnate or God the Son, that he was ever crucified or resurrected, or that he ever atoned for the sins of mankind.

I don’t see the agruement:shrug:

Peace
 
The Jews knew exactly who Jesus was and rejected him as the Messiah. In fact they didn’t want King of the Jews on the Cross which Pilate nailed up, because they did not believe this. Google “Rejection of Jesus” its all through the NT.

Right Islam rejects Jesus was God incarnate or God the Son, that he was ever crucified or resurrected, or that he ever atoned for the sins of mankind.

I don’t see the agruement:shrug:

Peace
Fair enough if you don’t. I was trying to use the official belief of the Jews and Islam as in the OT and the Quran. The former which we still use and accept as the truth and therefore whoever (the Jews) believes in it would have something in common with us.

I would disagree with you that the Jews knew who Jesus was. They did not and never were. Similarly even the apostles did not know the full extent of who he was until the resurrection and after. Like I said, the Jews ‘simply stopped’ at the OT and as if there was no major revelation after that.

The Quran however, is against the NT and a religious scripture which we do not accept as the truth. Thus for some Catholics, it may be quite problematic to accept that it is still worshipping the same God as us especially when it denies Jesus’ divinity, death and resurrection. Without the CCC 841 which we have to adhere to as Catholics, there would be less reason to justify that Islam and Christianity worship the same God. I have not gone into this topic in depth but merely to empathize with those Catholics who feel that Islam cannot be a religion to have the same God as us after it bluntly and explicitly condemn those who believe Jesus as the Son of God.

…the Christians call Christ the son of Allah. That is a saying from their mouth; (in this) they but imitate what the unbelievers of old used to say. Allah’s curse be on them: how they are deluded away from the Truth! -Surah 9:30 (Yusuf Ali)

The Quran literally pronounces a curse on those who believe that Jesus is God’s Son.

Peace.
 
The Quran however, is against the NT and a religious scripture which we do not accept as the truth. … Islam… bluntly and explicitly condemn those who believe Jesus as the Son of God.

…the Christians call Christ the son of Allah. That is a saying from their mouth; (in this) they but imitate what the unbelievers of old used to say. Allah’s curse be on them: how they are deluded away from the Truth! -Surah 9:30 (Yusuf Ali)

The Quran literally pronounces a curse on those who believe that Jesus is God’s Son.
By cross-referencing with other passages, however, one will see that the author(s) of the Qur’an misunderstood and misrepresented the doctrine of his/their adversaries as viewing Jesus as a child of God and Mary in the biological sense.
 
…the Christians call Christ the son of Allah. That is a saying from their mouth; (in this) they but imitate what the unbelievers of old used to say. Allah’s curse be on them: how they are deluded away from the Truth! -Surah 9:30 (Yusuf Ali)

The Quran literally pronounces a curse on those who believe that Jesus is God’s Son.
What is the meaning of “they imitate what the unbelievers of old used to say” :confused:

Any idea there Reuben J?

MJ
 
By cross-referencing with other passages, however, one will see that the author(s) of the Qur’an misunderstood and misrepresented the doctrine of his/their adversaries as viewing Jesus as a child of God and Mary in the biological sense.
I am not too sure about the passages that can be used as cross-references. If there are, then we wish that Muslim scholars would see that. However, there are stronger Quranic verses that would not allow such interpretation but that they emphasize it is wrong to take Jesus as a Son of God or Mary as the Mother of God.

*In blasphemy indeed are those that say that God is Christ the son of Mary. -Surah 5:17 (Yusuf Ali)

They say: “God hath begotten a son!” - Glory be to Him! He is self-sufficient! His are all things in the heavens and on earth! No warrant have ye for this! Say ye about Allah what ye know not? -Surah 10:68 (Yusuf Ali)

They said, “The Most Gracious has begotten a son”! You have uttered a gross blasphemy. The heavens are about to shatter, the earth is about to tear asunder, and the mountains are about to crumble. Because they claim that the Most Gracious has begotten a son. It is not befitting the Most Gracious that He should beget a son. –Surah 19:88-92 (Rashad Khalifa)*
 
What is the meaning of “they imitate what the unbelievers of old used to say” :confused:

Any idea there Reuben J?

MJ
*9:30 And the Jews say: Ezra is the son of Allah, and the Christians say: The Messiah is the son of Allah. That is their saying with their mouths. They imitate the saying of those who disbelieved of old. Allah (Himself) fighteth against them. How perverse are they!

9:31 They have taken as lords beside Allah their rabbis and their monks and the Messiah son of Mary, when they were bidden to worship only One God. There is no God save Him. Be He Glorified from all that they ascribe as partner (unto Him)!*

Verse 9:30 is a problem in itself and is historically wrong since Ezra was never called a ‘son of God’.

Verse 9:31 probably sheds light as to “those who disbelieved of old” and again this is historically wrong as no Jews would place their rabbis as equal to God. It is my guess, Martin, but the author of the Quran therefore could only had Jewish heretics, if there were, as befit that example.
 
*9:30 And the Jews say: Ezra is the son of Allah, and the Christians say: The Messiah is the son of Allah. That is their saying with their mouths. They imitate the saying of those who disbelieved of old. Allah (Himself) fighteth against them. How perverse are they!

9:31 They have taken as lords beside Allah their rabbis and their monks and the Messiah son of Mary, when they were bidden to worship only One God. There is no God save Him. Be He Glorified from all that they ascribe as partner (unto Him)!*

Verse 9:30 is a problem in itself and is historically wrong since Ezra was never called a ‘son of God’.

Verse 9:31 probably sheds light as to “those who disbelieved of old” and again this is historically wrong as no Jews would place their rabbis as equal to God. It is my guess, Martin, but the author of the Quran therefore could only had Jewish heretics, if there were, as befit that example.
Ah I see. Much appreciated! Quran i do know has several inaccurate historical issues in any case.

And for that, the Quran to me will never be a dependable source for facts.

MJ
 
What is the meaning of “they imitate what the unbelievers of old used to say” :confused:

Any idea there Reuben J?

MJ
Here is the tafsir for 9:30

**“Those who were involved in Kufr before them” were the Egyptians, the Greeks, the Romans, the Persians, etc. The Jews and the Christians were so influenced by their philosophies, their superstitions and fancies that they also invented erroneous creeds like theirs. **

Source: englishtafsir.com/Quran/9/index.html#sdfootnote31sym
 
Here is the tafsir for 9:30

**“Those who were involved in Kufr before them” were the Egyptians, the Greeks, the Romans, the Persians, etc. The Jews and the Christians were so influenced by their philosophies, their superstitions and fancies that they also invented erroneous creeds like theirs. **

Source: englishtafsir.com/Quran/9/index.html#sdfootnote31sym
There’s so much wrong in this train of thought I dont know where to begin. :mad

MJ
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top