non-Catholic Christians - "Did You Know"?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Jimmy_B
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
If a catholic man is married can he be a priest? Is he forbidden to be a bishop in your church for the mere fact he is married?

It was a mortal sin to eat meat on Friday’s before Vat 2 was it not?

Is it not true that it is a sin to eat meat on Fridays during Lent?
What’s your point?
 
CentralFLJames;3407795]
Quote:
Originally Posted by justasking4
What i see happening is that the term catholic which means universal is the identical to the term Roman Catholic which has distinct doctrines and is not universal. Technically they are not the same thing but i do realize that when the term catholic is used people are usually referring to the Roman Catholic church.

CentralFLJames
Well let’s see now. Given that Protestants define themselves through the negative of exclusion (e.g. 'those who protest against Catholic teaching")
What Catholic teachings were the reformers protesting against?
CentralFLJames
do you think it is logically proper for Protestants to claim they are the Universal Church through a minority right of separation?
Depends. If there is signifcant error in the Roman Catholic church and there is then yes it would be proper to think of protestants who are true to Christ would truly be the Universal Church.
CentralFLJames
Somehow I don’t think Jesus had in mind an unstructured borg like network-structure when He mentioned to Peter ‘thou are Peter and upon this rock I build my Church’. That’s hiearchy not anarchy.
Do we see anyone in the NT letters appealing to Peter as the rock on which Christ is building His church?
If you call yourself and introduce yourself as JustAsking4 do you think it is polite and respectful for somone else to address you by another name such as “JustPontificating IV” ?
👍
The following are prefiguring and de facto scripture references to The Catholic Church. Can you point to even one that prefigures Luther’s or Protestantism or any other non-Catholic Church?
Yes. Protestant churches are structured in doctrine and practice more like the NT church than Roman Catholicism. Many Protestant Churches are modeled after Acts 2:42 and Ephesians 4:11-12.

What you don’t see prefigured in Scripture are the marian doctrines or the rosary.
 
What’s your point?
I was referring to this phrase from I Timothy:
… Forbidding to marry, and commanding to abstain from meats.
I should have also added that the catholic church forbids it leaders i.e. priests, bishops and popes from marrying.
 
JA4…What exactly do you think 1 Tim. 3:15 means? In other words, what is your fallible interpretation of it?

Also, do you realize the “Roman Catholic Church” is referring to the Roman Rite of the Catholic Church; and that all of the rites are in communion with the Holy See?
 
I was referring to this phrase from I Timothy:
… Forbidding to marry, and commanding to abstain from meats.
I should have also added that the catholic church forbids it leaders i.e. priests, bishops and popes from marrying.
Okay. So are you saying that the Catholic Church is somehow fulfilling a prophecy here?
 
If a catholic man is married can he be a priest?
It depends upon a number of matters. There are exemptions, but the Latin Rite prefers to choose priests from those who are called to be celibate, so their interests won’t be divided, and they can give their whole attention to the Church.
Is he forbidden to be a bishop in your church for the mere fact he is married?
No, he is called to the vocation of marriage, to which he should give his full attention. The care of a bishop is the Teaching and the care of the flock. He is considered a spouse of the Church.
It was a mortal sin to eat meat on Friday’s before Vat 2 was it not?
While it is true that disobedience to the authority God has placed is is the road to hell, the quote I was responding to was about “forbidding to eat meats”. Catholics are not compelled to become vegetarians. Neither are there any other dietary requirements. The guidelines about fasting are a spiritual devotion, not dietary requirements.
Is it not true that it is a sin to eat meat on Fridays during Lent?
No, not in the US dioceses anyway. However, I believe the guidelines for keeping the fast are different in other places.
What Catholic teachings were the reformers protesting against?
I don’t think there were many. The protest was primarily about disciplines and practices. I think the main protest then, and still is today as exemplified by yourself, is rebellion against the authority appointed by Christ.
Depends. If there is signifcant error in the Roman Catholic church and there is then yes it would be proper to think of protestants who are true to Christ would truly be the Universal Church.
When you say things like this, you insult all the other Christians around the world who are true to their faith, but are not Protestant or Roman. It reflects a narrow minded thinking.
Do we see anyone in the NT letters appealing to Peter as the rock on which Christ is building His church?
Why would you need to? Everyone knew that. Even before the Gospel was written, this was taught through the whole church. Why do you think Jesus gave this commission only to Peter?

The NT reflects the teachings. That is why this is in the NT.
Yes. Protestant churches are structured in doctrine and practice more like the NT church than Roman Catholicism. Many Protestant Churches are modeled after Acts 2:42 and Ephesians 4:11-12.
I think you are formulating it backwards, ja4. We don’t see any other man made churches mentioned in the NT, except groups or people that are in error for departing from right doctrine. The doctrine of the Apostles is not “protestant”, and neither were their practices. What has happened is that sincere persons, craving that right doctrine, yet having been separated from the Apostolic Succession have tried to recreate it in the present day. Apostolic succession has to be passed from one person to another. It does not spring forth from the imagination of man based upon what they read in the NT.
Code:
 What you don't see prefigured in Scripture are the marian doctrines or the rosary.
On the contrary, this is exactly where we see the prefigurments!
👍
I was referring to this phrase from I Timothy:
… Forbidding to marry, and commanding to abstain from meats.
I should have also added that the catholic church forbids it leaders i.e. priests, bishops and popes from marrying.
No one is forbidden to marry. No one is commanded to abstaing from meats. The Latin Rite prefers to take clergy from those who are called to celibacy, so that their interests will not be divided, and they can give full attention to the flock of God. The guidelines for fasting are a spiritual discipline, not a dietary requirement. There is nothing wrong with eating meats, and the Catholic Church has never taught that there was.
 
Are you suggesting that Jesus and Paul, having embraced celibacy for the sake of the Kingdom, had fallen away from the truth?

Do you think that the Catholic Church forbids ANYONE to marry? :eek:

Do you think that Catholics are commanded to be vegetarians? :eek:
I’m speaking to those that “forbid” to marry… Jesus and Paul chose not to. It is fine for priest to remain celibate if they choose. It’s the “forbidding to” that is not scriptural.
 
I’m speaking to those that “forbid” to marry… Jesus and Paul chose not to. It is fine for priest to remain celibate if they choose. It’s the “forbidding to” that is not scriptural.
The Catholic Church does not forbid a person to marry. Celibate priests are preferred because there interests are not divided, and they can serve the Church without distraction. They have already made a vow of celibacy before they are ordained as priests. They make this choice of their own free will.

If they are called to marriage, then the Church prefers for them to give their whole being to that vocation.
 
Originally Posted by submittedjoy
I’m speaking to those that “forbid” to marry… Jesus and Paul chose not to. It is fine for priest to remain celibate if they choose. It’s the “forbidding to” that is not scriptural.

guanophore
The Catholic Church does not forbid a person to marry. Celibate priests are preferred because there interests are not divided, and they can serve the Church without distraction. They have already made a vow of celibacy before they are ordained as priests. They make this choice of their own free will.

If they are called to marriage, then the Church prefers for them to give their whole being to that vocation.
This is not the scriptural mandate though. It is a requirement in the catholic church if a man desires to be a bishop he cannot be married. He is immediately disqualified for the mere fact he is married.
Secondly, we know there are many excellent protestant ministers who are married and are able to serve the church very well. In fact they can actually be in a better position if their wives support them spiritually and emotionally on a deep level.
 
This is not the scriptural mandate though. It is a requirement in the catholic church if a man desires to be a bishop he cannot be married. He is immediately disqualified for the mere fact he is married.
Secondly, we know there are many excellent protestant ministers who are married and are able to serve the church very well. In fact they can actually be in a better position if their wives support them spiritually and emotionally on a deep level.
There is so tell me how many Protestant Churches are opened today for Easter Services.

I see most closed esspecially Baptist

Wonder Why?

I do not see the Protestant Churches opened from dawn to dusk.
Wonder Why?
 
c659smith;3409632]
Originally Posted by justasking4
This is not the scriptural mandate though. It is a requirement in the catholic church if a man desires to be a bishop he cannot be married. He is immediately disqualified for the mere fact he is married.
Secondly, we know there are many excellent protestant ministers who are married and are able to serve the church very well. In fact they can actually be in a better position if their wives support them spiritually and emotionally on a deep level.
c659smith
There is so tell me how many Protestant Churches are opened today for Easter Services
.
32,999—👍
I see most closed esspecially Baptist
Wonder Why?
i to would wonder…

I do not see the Protestant Churches opened from dawn to dusk.
Wonder Why?
 
There is so tell me how many Protestant Churches are opened today for Easter Services.
Easter is in two weeks time.

A lot of Protestants in my town are going to be following the cross through the streets with the Roman Catholics.
I see most closed esspecially Baptist

Wonder Why?
I’m not baptist but maybe they are where Jesus liked to be. Among ‘sinners’ prostitutes, the down and out, the hurting etc etc.
I do not see the Protestant Churches opened from dawn to dusk.
Wonder Why?
There are some that are open 24 hours a day. But so what. Does how often the church building is open or how often we attend things there make us better Christians? God isn’t impressed with our piety at all.

I feel difficult writing this because God has revealed to me that I am an idolater. I have an idol called Anglicanism. People from all traditions in my town are feeling so God is revealling the same thing to them.

Jesus isn’t interested in individual denominations and he isn’t interested in ecumenicalism but he is interested in building his Church. His Church and not yours or mine. His Church and not the RC Church or The Anglican Church or The baptist Church.

In the light of that, I would love to change my handle.:o
 
This is not the scriptural mandate though. It is a requirement in the catholic church if a man desires to be a bishop he cannot be married. He is immediately disqualified for the mere fact he is married.
Secondly, we know there are many excellent protestant ministers who are married and are able to serve the church very well. In fact they can actually be in a better position if their wives support them spiritually and emotionally on a deep level.
Excellence is not a relative concept. Teaching fractional truth, is not “excellence”. God does not grade on a curve. If one dies impenitent in mortal sin - that man was an “excellent sinner” and self-condems itself to Hell. All it takes is one grave sin, one false teaching that leads some other soul to hell to become non-excellent in God’s judgement. You judge by man’s standards not God’s.

The overwhelming majority of Catholic clergy are holy men who are devoted to God just like Jesus was. They are not distracted from service by the demands of attending to a spouse since that would take too much time away from the spousal commitment as well as God’s service. I don’t think you get just how devout these priests are and how much of their life they spend in God’s service. It’s a FULL TIME LIFE JOB to be a priest. They get called at all hours of the day and night to attend to the sick and the dieing, those needing comfort, those needing counseling and encouragement. They always prepare themselves in quiet prayer for the liturgy of the mass and the homilies and the affairs of running the Church. That level of service requires a commitment to God and service that would be unfair to a marriage relationship. It would end up dividing the sacrifice of marriage against the sacrifice of the priesthood and work at cross purposes. Further our priests while being very human are very pious and holy. You will not too often see a Catholic Priest out in secular life attending wild parties, or public secular events and getting caught up “in the world” and the affairs of secular life. That would be degrading to the pious image and example of a priestly servant of God.

At one time early in my life when I was less informed about the theology that I imagined that priests should marry. I am now extremely opposed to the idea. I don’t want our priests looking anything like what I see in the Protestant clergy. I don’t have too many handy statistics but there are enormous anecdotal accounts of “two faces” to a protestant minister - what behavior and stress happen at home and what face is show in public.

According to one protestant study the vast majority of Protestant clergy believe there is additional pressure on pastors’ families.
Stress in Protestant Minister Families:
More Here
The vast majority of Protestant clergy believe there is additional pressure on pastors’ families. Ninety-four percent agree with the statement, “There is extra pressure being married to a minister,” including 54 percent who strongly believe this. Ninety-one percent also agree that “There is extra pressure being the child of a minister,” including 46 percent who feel this way strongly. Lutherans and Presbyterians are considerably less likely to perceive strong pressures on their spouse and children than are pastors from other denominational groups.** Southern Baptist and Pentecostals, particularly, feel that “Churchgoers often expect pastors’ families to be ‘better than’ other people’s families**.”
I for one consider The Catholic Church extremely blessed that we have such devoted priests and our clergy look nothing like what we often see in secular aligned church ministries. Yet we have plenty of lay leadership and holy men and women right within our own pews who lead by example in secular life as well. Our typical married deacons and laity are very devout and if I must say I have yet to meet a protestant minister or clergy who come even close to the pious levels that even our laity have. I can however respect the Presbyterian ministers and some Anglican ministers as perhaps the closest I have seen to the standards and conduct we maintain but they do not have valid priestly orders unless converting back to The Catholic Church.

James
 
Easter is in two weeks time.

A lot of Protestants in my town are going to be following the cross through the streets with the Roman Catholics.

I’m not baptist but maybe they are where Jesus liked to be. Among ‘sinners’ prostitutes, the down and out, the hurting etc etc.

There are some that are open 24 hours a day. But so what. Does how often the church building is open or how often we attend things there make us better Christians? God isn’t impressed with our piety at all.

I feel difficult writing this because God has revealed to me that I am an idolater. I have an idol called Anglicanism. People from all traditions in my town are feeling so God is revealling the same thing to them.

Jesus isn’t interested in individual denominations and he isn’t interested in ecumenicalism but he is interested in building his Church. His Church and not yours or mine. His Church and not the RC Church or The Anglican Church or The baptist Church.

In the light of that, I would love to change my handle.:o
His Church is the Catholic Church That is the church Jesus built.

The Catholic Church is not a building as it is within the Eucharist and without the Eucharist there is no Church.

My point was that priests are married to the church they are the bridegroom awaiting Jesus;s return.
They devout their lives to the church 24/7 so there is little distractions
 
What Catholic teachings were the reformers protesting against?
As best I can tell the largest issues Protestants had in general was authority of the priests, bishops and pope. Once they broke away from the teaching authority of The Church and gave it “to the people” they invented every conceivable sort of oddball doctrine and teaching imaginable. The only thing that unites the 30,000 or so Protestant sects at all is their common scorn for The Catholic Church and the authority Jesus gave it.
Depends. If there is significant error in the Roman Catholic church and there is then yes it would be proper to think of protestants who are true to Christ would truly be the Universal Church.
This is absurd at face value. Which of the 30,000 or so protestant sects does not have ‘significant error’ and it can call itself “The Universal Church”. Only the Catholic Church has called itself “universal” for 2,000 years. So you want us to believe that the only church calling itself “Catholic” is the only one in ‘significant error’? :rolleyes:
Do we see anyone in the NT letters appealing to Peter as the rock on which Christ is building His church?
What relevance is this? The Church is prefigured in dozens of OT and NT scriptures that I have already enumerated. Why single out a single text? Either you accept all of scripture or none of scripture. While pondering that also ask yourself why is it that Protestants have “no wisdom” in their KJV when The Church had it for 1500 years before Protestants came into existence to remove it?
Yes. Protestant churches are structured in doctrine and practice more like the NT church than Roman Catholicism. Many Protestant Churches are modeled after Acts 2:42 and Ephesians 4:11-12.
Where in scripture do we get the screaming, and shouting oration style so common of fundamentalist protestants? Where in scripture do we get the infamous example for TV evangelicals like Bakker, Swaggart and Oral Roberts?
What you don’t see prefigured in Scripture are the marian doctrines or the rosary.
Are you sure you are reading the same bible I am? You don’t see all the example of prayer in the scripture? Do you have any idea what a rosary even is? Do you have a clue with the rosary mysteries are? Hint - its a focus on the life of the Holy Family and the scriptural accounts.

As for Marian doctrine we have given you enormous scriptural references in other threads.

James
 
Not sure what you mean. Can you clarify?
As you probably know, I Tim 3:15 says the Church is the pillar and bullwark of truth. I’m just wondering what your fallible interpretation is of this passage. Would an example of this truth be baptism?
 
This is not the scriptural mandate though. It is a requirement in the catholic church if a man desires to be a bishop he cannot be married. He is immediately disqualified for the mere fact he is married.
No, you have it backwards, ja4. A person who is called to be bishop is called to espouse himself to the Church, like Jesus has done. He represents the Shepherd to the people. It would be more accurate to say that he is REQUIRED to be married, and that his marriage is to the Bride of the Lamb. A married person is not “disqualified”, he is differently called. Marriage is considered a full time vocation in itself. The Church calls those who are able to devote all their attention, so that their interests will not be divided.

Scripture does not “mandate” that a bishop be married, Scripture mandates that a bishop not have been the husband of more than one wife. this is another example of what Sacred Tradition brings to us. When we read this passage in the light of the Apostolic TEachings, we understand that this is not a mandate. Since you reject the Sacred Tradition, you misinterpred the passage. See how that works?
Secondly, we know there are many excellent protestant ministers who are married and are able to serve the church very well. In fact they can actually be in a better position if their wives support them spiritually and emotionally on a deep level.
Some of these excellent Protestant Ministers are accepted into the Catholic Priesthood. That is why we keep telling you that being married does not disqualify a person. I don’t understand why it is so important for you to disregard the facts. I guess you would not be able to retain your bigotry otherwise. 🤷
 
guanophore;3411844]
Originally Posted by justasking4
This is not the scriptural mandate though. It is a requirement in the catholic church if a man desires to be a bishop he cannot be married. He is immediately disqualified for the mere fact he is married.
guanophore
No, you have it backwards, ja4. A person who is called to be bishop is called to espouse himself to the Church, like Jesus has done.
Where did Jesus or His apostles ever mandate that leaders in the church were to be single and celibate? Chapter and verse please.
He represents the Shepherd to the people.
The Shepard never made a person’s marital status part of representing Him. Did Jesus pick married or unmarried men to be His apostles or disciples? Did He say anywhere in the gospels that a leader of His must be single and celibate?
It would be more accurate to say that he is REQUIRED to be married, and that his marriage is to the Bride of the Lamb. A married person is not “disqualified”, he is differently called.
If what you say is true then why does Paul in I Timothy 3 want married men with familes to be leaders in the church?
Marriage is considered a full time vocation in itself. The Church calls those who are able to devote all their attention, so that their interests will not be divided.
I know your church says this but it is an unbilical mandate. It is a doctrine of men.
Scripture does not “mandate” that a bishop be married, Scripture mandates that a bishop not have been the husband of more than one wife. this is another example of what Sacred Tradition brings to us.
Then you are contradicting your own Sacred Traditions since even you admit here that the bishop is a husband i.e. a married man.
When we read this passage in the light of the Apostolic TEachings, we understand that this is not a mandate. Since you reject the Sacred Tradition, you misinterpred the passage. See how that works?
What i see you doing is rejecting the clear counsel of Scripture on this matter.
Quote:
Originally Posted by justasking4
Secondly, we know there are many excellent protestant ministers who are married and are able to serve the church very well. In fact they can actually be in a better position if their wives support them spiritually and emotionally on a deep level.
guanophore
Some of these excellent Protestant Ministers are accepted into the Catholic Priesthood. That is why we keep telling you that being married does not disqualify a person.
If a Roman Catholic man is married and wants to become a priest can he do so while being married?
I don’t understand why it is so important for you to disregard the facts.
I’m fully aware of these “exceptions” that you mention. Its my previous one you need to deal with. That is the question that goes to the heart of the matter.
I guess you would not be able to retain your bigotry otherwise
.

😃
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top