If a catholic man is married can he be a priest?
It depends upon a number of matters. There are exemptions, but the Latin Rite prefers to choose priests from those who are called to be celibate, so their interests won’t be divided, and they can give their whole attention to the Church.
Is he forbidden to be a bishop in your church for the mere fact he is married?
No, he is called to the vocation of marriage, to which he should give his full attention. The care of a bishop is the Teaching and the care of the flock. He is considered a spouse of the Church.
It was a mortal sin to eat meat on Friday’s before Vat 2 was it not?
While it is true that disobedience to the authority God has placed is is the road to hell, the quote I was responding to was about “forbidding to eat meats”. Catholics are not compelled to become vegetarians. Neither are there any other dietary requirements. The guidelines about fasting are a spiritual devotion, not dietary requirements.
Is it not true that it is a sin to eat meat on Fridays during Lent?
No, not in the US dioceses anyway. However, I believe the guidelines for keeping the fast are different in other places.
What Catholic teachings were the reformers protesting against?
I don’t think there were many. The protest was primarily about disciplines and practices. I think the main protest then, and still is today as exemplified by yourself, is rebellion against the authority appointed by Christ.
Depends. If there is signifcant error in the Roman Catholic church and there is then yes it would be proper to think of protestants who are true to Christ would truly be the Universal Church.
When you say things like this, you insult all the other Christians around the world who are true to their faith, but are not Protestant or Roman. It reflects a narrow minded thinking.
Do we see anyone in the NT letters appealing to Peter as the rock on which Christ is building His church?
Why would you need to? Everyone knew that. Even before the Gospel was written, this was taught through the whole church. Why do you think Jesus gave this commission only to Peter?
The NT reflects the teachings. That is why this is in the NT.
Yes. Protestant churches are structured in doctrine and practice more like the NT church than Roman Catholicism. Many Protestant Churches are modeled after Acts 2:42 and Ephesians 4:11-12.
I think you are formulating it backwards, ja4. We don’t see any other man made churches mentioned in the NT, except groups or people that are in error for departing from right doctrine. The doctrine of the Apostles is not “protestant”, and neither were their practices. What has happened is that sincere persons, craving that right doctrine, yet having been separated from the Apostolic Succession have tried to recreate it in the present day. Apostolic succession has to be passed from one person to another. It does not spring forth from the imagination of man based upon what they read in the NT.
Code:
What you don't see prefigured in Scripture are the marian doctrines or the rosary.
On the contrary, this is exactly where we see the prefigurments!
I was referring to this phrase from I Timothy:
… Forbidding to marry, and commanding to abstain from meats.
I should have also added that the catholic church forbids it leaders i.e. priests, bishops and popes from marrying.
No one is forbidden to marry. No one is commanded to abstaing from meats. The Latin Rite prefers to take clergy from those who are called to celibacy, so that their interests will not be divided, and they can give full attention to the flock of God. The guidelines for fasting are a spiritual discipline, not a dietary requirement. There is nothing wrong with eating meats, and the Catholic Church has never taught that there was.