Non-Catholics on these boards...

  • Thread starter Thread starter mango_2003
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
40.png
Peg:
Unworthy Soul, Jesus told his Apostles to submit to proper authority. He also clearly gave authority to the Apostles. No where in the New Testament does it tell us that this not longer applies. When we do not submit to proper authority, we are no longer protected by their authority. One of the main themes of the Whole Bible is obedience. Obedience has not meaning if we just change churches when we disagree.

On another forum, I read the conversion story of a man who was a minister. He met a woman who was divorced. Before he got into a committed relationship with her, he took it to his board of directors and there was not problem. After the became serious about the woman, they changed his mind and had him removed. How biblical is it for the sheep to fire the shepard? I find this whole concept very upsetting. He also spoke of another pastor that was let go because he was getting older. How does that square with christianity?
Woah, easy, I was quoting Ric but for some reason the tags got removed and I apparently can’t go back and edit it, the edit button is not there. My replies are in bold only. Trust me, I’m a faithful Roman Catholic.
 
40.png
UnworthySoul:
If that is the case, and it is what you base your beliefs on, where is the factual basis for your gods?
I don’t base my beliefs on factual evidence—if I did that, I’d be an atheist. But on the other hand, I try not to have beliefs that go against what is factually known, such as young-earth creationism. Original Sin is another one of those beliefs that are in defiance of the facts—not just unproved (like my beliefs about the Gods are) but disproved.
 
40.png
Ric:
Dear, dear Shari,

Trust me (believe it or not), I am not by any means “anti-catholic”!

I love all Roman Catholics, heck I even married one!

I do, however, disagree with Roman Catholic teachings (be it just a few of the teachings), but are enough to give me very much great concern for the members of the Roman Catholic church!

I pray daily for everyone I converse with on these boards be it if they are Roman Catholic or not.

I will never become a member of the Roman Catholic church unless she changes her teachings on salvation (my main concern) and a few other teaching.

God Bless!
Ric, Of what faith are you? And how is your relationship with your wife regarding religion?
 
40.png
mrS4ntA:
In Christ, through Mary
mrS4nta,

While I sort of understand where Alphonsus is coming from after reading your explanation, your last statement troubles me as well. What exactly do you mean by “through Mary?” Why do we need to go through Mary, a mere human, to get to Christ? That’s the whole reason that Christ came to earth: to provide a way to God. Christ alone is our mediator, our link to God; He is the means by which we are made right with God. At least in my opinion, the idea that we have to go through Mary to get to God denies the fundamental purpose of Christ’s sacrifice and throws another needless obstacle in one’s path. Am I misreading your statement?

In Christ,

Chris
 
40.png
UnworthySoul:
One thought from this catholic, St. Alphonsus is wrong. Pretty simple. 😃
I’d have to agree. After all, his statements are not Catholic doctrine.
 
Heathen Dawn:
Original Sin is another one of those beliefs that are in defiance of the facts—not just unproved (like my beliefs about the Gods are) but disproved.
How has Original Sin been disproved?
 
40.png
Thepeug:
mrS4nta,

While I sort of understand where Alphonsus is coming from after reading your explanation, your last statement troubles me as well. What exactly do you mean by “through Mary?” Why do we need to go through Mary, a mere human, to get to Christ? That’s the whole reason that Christ came to earth: to provide a way to God. Christ alone is our mediator, our link to God; He is the means by which we are made right with God. At least in my opinion, the idea that we have to go through Mary to get to God denies the fundamental purpose of Christ’s sacrifice and throws another needless obstacle in one’s path. Am I misreading your statement?

In Christ,

Chris
Yes, Chris, you are misreading the statement. In both my post and mrS4ntA’s post, we state that Mary is not divine and that she is not God and that salvation is through Christ. We are merely recognizing and being thankful for what Mary did when she, through her own free will, agreed to be His mother and accept all the joys and agonies that came with that.

We do not say that we HAVE to go through Mary to get to God. But He certainly came through Mary to get to us. What a special, sinless person, so full of God’ grace was Mary for this to happen. That we what we have respect for.

Now, please acknowledge that that fact has been clearly explained. Please stop over looking it. On the other hand, if it wasn’t clear to you, say so, and I’ll (we’ll) explain it again. As many times as you need us to.
 
40.png
Thepeug:
mrS4nta,

While I sort of understand where Alphonsus is coming from after reading your explanation, your last statement troubles me as well. What exactly do you mean by “through Mary?” Why do we need to go through Mary, a mere human, to get to Christ? That’s the whole reason that Christ came to earth: to provide a way to God. Christ alone is our mediator, our link to God; He is the means by which we are made right with God. At least in my opinion, the idea that we have to go through Mary to get to God denies the fundamental purpose of Christ’s sacrifice and throws another needless obstacle in one’s path. Am I misreading your statement?

In Christ,

Chris
That statement was popularised by the greatest advocate of Marian devotion himself, St. Louis deMontfort. Here’s his explanation:

*"…this great Lord, who is ever independent and self-sufficient, never had and does not now have any absolute need of the Blessed Virgin for the accomplishment of his will and the manifestation of his glory. To do all things he has only to will them.
  1. However, I declare that, considering things as they are, because God has decided to begin and accomplish his greatest works through the Blessed Virgin ever since he created her, we can safely believe that he will not change his plan in the time to come, for he is God and therefore does not change in his thoughts or his way of acting. …"
"“The world being unworthy,” said Saint Augustine, “to receive the Son of God directly from the hands of the Father, he gave his Son to Mary for the world to receive him from her.” The Son of God became man for our salvation but only in Mary and through Mary. God the Holy Spirit formed Jesus Christ in Mary but only after having asked her consent through one of the chief ministers of his court.
  1. God the Father imparted to Mary his fruitfulness as far as a mere creature was capable of receiving it, to enable her to bring forth his Son and all the members of his mystical body."*
(emphasise is mine)
to be continued…

emmerich1.com/TrueDevotion.htm#CHAPTER%20ONE%20NECESSITY%20OF%20DEVOTION%20TO%20OUR%20LADY
 
Mary and MrS4nta,

I really appreciate your patience, 'cause I know I’m kind of beating a dead horse here. And I do acknowledge that you don’t consider Mary to be divine. Also, mrS4nta, the qutoes you just provided make a lot of sense. I’ll save them so I can read them later if I have any more questions about the whole “through Mary” deal. That said, let me just toss in one more little tidbit, and then I promise I’ll leave the subject alone :o .

While I understand your explanations about Mary and pretty much agree with them from a theological perspective (especially your most recent one), here are two more quotes that I find irksome:

“Sinners receive pardon by the intercession of Mary alone.”
St. John Chrysostom

“No one ever finds Christ but with and through Mary. Whoever seeks Christ apart from Mary seeks Him in vain.”
St. Bonaventure

You say that we don’t HAVE to pray to Mary to get to Christ, and I completely agree. But these guys (saints of the Church) don’t seem to think so. As UnworthySoul pointed out, I know that these quotes are not official Catholic teachings, but they can still be very misleading from an outsider’s perspective. Again, I don’t mean to drag out the subject, but any thoughts you or anyone else can give on the above are greatly appreciated!

Grateful,

Chris
 
40.png
Thepeug:
Mary and mrS4nta,

I really appreciate your patience, 'cause I know I’m kind of beating a dead horse here. And I do acknowledge that you don’t consider Mary to be divine. Also, mrS4nta, the above quotes that you just provided make a lot of sense. I’ll save them to read again if I have any questons about the “through Mary” deal. That said, let me just toss in one more little tidbit, and then I promise I’ll leave the subject alone :o .

While I understand your explanations about Mary and pretty much agree with them from a theological perspective (especially the most recent ones), here are two more quotes that I find irksome:

“Sinners receive pardon by the intercession of Mary alone.”
St. John Chrysostom

“No one ever finds Christ but with and through Mary. Whoever seeks Christ apart from Mary seeks Him in vain.”
St. Bonaventure

You say that we don’t HAVE to pray to Mary to get to Christ, and I completely agree. But these guys (saints of the Church) don’t seem to think so. As UnworthySoul pointed out, I know that these quotes are not official Catholic teachings, but they can still be very misleading from an outsider’s perspective. Again, I don’t mean to drag out the subject, but any thoughts you or anyone else can give on the above are greatly appreciated!

Grateful,

Chris
 
40.png
Ric:
Thanks for the welcome Bud!

Let me assure you that I can by no means ‘pick off the weak of the flock’ here, that is not my job - that’s God’s job. My job is only to share God’s truths with all (Roman Catholic or not). I am a Christian apologist, still learning. And all I want to share is the TRUTH (God’s truth and not mine) and I use the Bible through the Holy Spirit. If I learn something from these forums of Karl’s, I would welcome it if it is Biblical! (And I have learned a few things from Roman Catholics that are truly Biblical, what a blessing!)
If you really want a biblically grounded discussion, then listen to what Catholics have to say.

Pax
John
 
40.png
Geocacher:
My hand is also raised.

Im a Mormon from the LDS Church, and been listening to Catholic Answers for several years now on EWTN. The thing thats bringing me toward catholic life is Cronic Fatigue, with a big cross, and this is a problem in the LDS faith.
What do you mean by… “big cross”?

-D
 


*“18. God the Son came into her virginal womb as a new Adam into his earthly paradise, to take his delight there and produce hidden wonders of grace. God-made-man found freedom in imprisoning himself in her womb. He displayed power in allowing himself to be borne by this young maiden. He found his glory and that of his Father in hiding his splendours from all creatures here below and revealing them only to Mary. He glorified his independence and his majesty in depending upon this lovable virgin in his conception, his birth, his presentation in the temple, and in the thirty years of his hidden life. Even at his death she had to be present so that he might be united with her in one sacrifice and be immolated with her consent to the eternal Father, just as formerly Isaac was offered in sacrifice by Abraham when he accepted the will of God. It was Mary who nursed him, fed him, cared for him, reared him, and sacrificed him for us. The Holy Spirit could not leave such wonderful and inconceivable dependence of God unmentioned in the Gospel, though he concealed almost all the wonderful things that Wisdom Incarnate did during his hidden life in order to bring home to us its infinite value and glory. Jesus gave more glory to God his Father by submitting to his Mother for thirty years than he would have given him had he converted the whole world by working the greatest miracles. How highly then do we glorify God when to please him we submit ourselves to Mary, taking Jesus as our sole model.

“19. If we examine closely the remainder of the life of Jesus Christ, we see that he chose to begin his miracles through Mary. …”

“20. God the Holy Spirit, who does not produce any divine person, became fruitful through Mary whom he espoused. It was with her, in her and of her that he produced his masterpiece, God-made-man, and that he produces every day until the end of the world the members of the body of this adorable Head. For this reason the more he finds Mary his dear and inseparable spouse in a soul the more powerful and effective he becomes in producing Jesus Christ in that soul and that soul in Jesus Christ.”

“21. This does not mean that the Blessed Virgin confers on the Holy Spirit a fruitfulness which he does not already possess. Being God, he has the ability to produce just like the Father and the Son, although he does not use this power and so does not produce another divine person. But it does mean that the Holy Spirit chose to make use of our Blessed Lady, although he had no absolute need of her, in order to become actively fruitful in producing Jesus Christ and his members in her and by her. This is a mystery of grace unknown even to many of the most learned and spiritual of Christians.”*

Again, the emphasises are mine.
…to be continued…
 
If you reject the Pope then you are disobeying JESUS. In Matthew 16:18 JESUS gave Peter the keys to the kingdom. Thus, Jesus gave Peter the authority. The keys are a symbol of authority according to the Old Testament. Jesus was a master of the Old Testament and knew exactly what the symbolism of the keys was. Jesus instructed Peter to lead the flock of believers in John 21:15-17. Therefore Peter was the leader of the church. The leader of the church is now John Paul II. There will be another Leader/Pope after the current John Paul II. As you see, the postion of the Pope is very biblical. I suggest you read the tract entitled “The Papacy” on catholic.com
40.png
Ric:
I submit to the authority of God alone and not to any man on the Earth (as in someone like the pope). Of course I do submit to my pastor - but to a point, when he is wrong God is then the final authority. I truly believe that the position of the pope is unbiblical and the Roman Catholic church give the man (pope) too much authority. I totally reject the pope and I will stay in communion with Jesus Christ!

Yes, I am Catholic (Universal), but I am not Roman Catholic (or any “rite”). Jesus is my Lord and Savior, and I have received Him with an open heart, mind and spirit and trust Him totally for my salvation alone!
 
*“23. God the Father gathered all the waters together and called them the seas (maria). He gathered all his graces together and called them Mary (Maria). The great God has a treasury or storehouse full of riches in which he has enclosed all that is beautiful, resplendent, rare, and precious, even his own Son. This immense treasury is none other than Mary whom the saints call the “treasury of the Lord”. From her fullness all men are made rich.”

“… [God the Son] made her the treasurer of all his Father had given him as heritage. Through her he applies his merits to his members and through her he transmits his virtues and distributes his graces. She is his mystical channel, his aqueduct, through which he causes his mercies to flow gently and abundantly.”*

And so forth, and so forth, the explanations given by St Louis are more than necessary to understand the plan of our Salvation that is in Christ, through Mary.

You say that Christ is our sole mediator to God. I agree. He is the One who redeemed us, after all. But isn’t Christ God the Son as well? Don’t we need all the help we need to approach this Christ who is “equal in majesty” to God the Father and God the Holy Ghost? Don’t we need the work and prayer His accompliche, most exalted of which is His holy Mother?

“Thus the most fearful enemy that God has set up against the devil is Mary, his holy Mother,” – the Woman whom God has put an **enmity ** between her and the Serpent. The Devil fears Mary’s power, in a sense even more so than God’s! “This does not mean that the anger, hatred and power of God are not infinitely greater than the Blessed Virgin’s, since her attributes are limited. It simply means that Satan, being so proud, suffers infinitely more in being vanquished and punished by a lowly and humble servant of God, for her humility humiliates him more than the power of God.”

*“God has established not just one enmity but “enmities”, and not only between Mary and Satan but between her race and his race.” *

Sieged by the mighty power of the Evil One, who at times can seem very overwhelming to us, it is not exaggerating to say that we need Mary’s power more and more - without which Satan will have a much greater chance in binding us to his slavery. Hence, “our salvation is won by Mary’s intercession,” who “alone” can save us against his diabolical armies.

Makes sense?

I’d like to conclude with this quote (also from St. Louis), which summarises it all:

“…we must conclude that, being necessary to God by a necessity which is called “hypothetical”, (that is, because God so willed it), the Blessed Virgin is all the more necessary for men to attain their final end. Consequently we must not place devotion to her on the same level as devotion to the other saints as if it were merely something optional.”

In Christ through Mary,
S4ntA.
 
Heathen Dawn,

Just because Adam and Eve are, in my opinon, the “first humans” in a more allegorical than a literal sense doesn’t change the fact that somewhere along the line we screwed things up, and so suffer the consequences today.

God bless,

Chris
 
Heathen Dawn:
We’re not descended from just one man and one woman, that’s how.
“Modern thinkers may claim that evolution disproves original sin, even though evolution is still only a theory. Even if evolution were proven to be fact, fossils can tell us little about our first parents and their spiritual souls. Also recent research in human mitochondrial DNA tends to indicate that the human race descended from a single woman - perhaps scientific evidence for Eve. (Mitochondrial DNA is genetic material inherited only from the mother and not from the father, unlike nuclear DNA.) Now evolution does not disprove original sin, but on the contrary - sin seems to disprove evolution. Evolution does not explain man’s sinful setback. If man evolved from animals, then man also shares a common digression missing among animals.”

users.binary.net/polycarp/origsin.html

I thank you for your forthright answers and your openness to engage in debate in an hnoest way with no malice intended. I only hope to be able to do the same.

Also, please keep in mind that while “Adam and Eve” are used to represent the first man and woman, symbolism was used quite often in times apast (and in the Bible) to relate a truth in a way the people of the time were capable of understanding. It’s interesting to note that “Adam” does not always refer to a specific man in the Bible, often “Adam” is used to represent mankind. In this way, the part of the Creation story relating to Adam and Eve’s fall from grace into Original Sin can be seen as an allegory of mankind’s orginal fall into sin as a whole; that man knowingly chose, at some point to reject what God told them. Some people ask me how I can believe this and still claim to be catholic. It’s quite simple really. Whether you take the Creation story as literal or symbolic of God’s Will, the message is no different at all. And it’s helpful for me to remind them that Jesus used parables to relate truths no less valid for all that they were indeed truths told by way of stories.

Again, thanks for adding to the conversation and being courteous about it. If I have come off in any other way, then you have my apology. 👍
 
I thank you both for your graciousness. You’re entitled to believe in Original Sin, and I’m entitled to disbelieve, seeing that it isn’t a fact as clear as the noonday sun.

A point: Original Sin is a uniquely Christian doctrine. My upbringing on the Bible has been Jewish. Nowhere in my Bible studies have I heard or been led to believe in Original Sin. The Jews have the same Genesis with the same Adam and Eve, yet they disbelieve in Original Sin. So it is not self-evident from Genesis. I think it is a Pauline invention.

Another point: I do not believe the God of the Bible, Yahweh, is the creator of the universe, but that He is one among many Gods. So, in my mind, even if Original Sin held true, it would only impact the relationship of people with Yahweh. My relationship with the Goddess and the God of Wicca is unobstructed by any Original Sin.

Blessed be.
HD
 
ric, if it’s the Holy Spirit guiding you (us) in scriptural interpretation
why do all protestants believe different things? Holy Spirit playing games? How come the Catholic Church is so hard? Read and find out. The Church Fathers like that one fela said do overlap with the apostles. Ignatius was a hearer of John the Apostle. Was everyone walking around with Bibles during the time of the Apostles? Who gave you the bible? Read the Didache, also known as the “teaching of the twelve”. It outlines the Liturgy and everything else Catholic we have today. This was a first century document. Why is it that no one was complaining about the Church in these formative years re; doctrine and so forth. How come so many people died willingly for the Church. Ignatius of Antioch calls the Church “Catholic” in these first century writings on his way to be eaten by the beasts in the arena. I have a protestant friend who came into the church – he said he felt robbed that all this rich tradition and early written material was never offered as viable subject matter. THERE IS A THING CALLED HISTORY. Why is Catholic such a hard saying? The Eucharest was harder, yet twelve remained.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top