Obama ‘Abruptly’ Walks Out of Debt Talks

  • Thread starter Thread starter gilliam
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
MORAL CRITERIA FOR GOVERNMENT BUDGETARY DECISIONS.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This from my store of quotes, Just a reminder…

Anyone who really cares about the poor should have no problem adopting the framework set forth by the Bishops of three moral criteria that should guide budgetary decisions:
THE BISHOPS SAY….
  1. Every budget decision should be assessed by whether it protects or threatens human life and dignity.
  2. A central moral measure of any budget proposal is how it affects “the least of these” (Matthew 25). The needs of those who are hungry and homeless, without work or in poverty should come first.
  3. Government and other institutions have a shared responsibility to promote the common good of all, especially ordinary workers and families who struggle to live in dignity in difficult economic times.
    It has been said over and over again by the people you so oppose. our present elected administrative leaders,
Peace, Carlan
Bishops aren’t economic or constitutional experts. Our constitution does not allow the Federal government to do what it does. You should at least be happy that those unconstitutional programs even exist at the Federal level.
 
They’re called Social Security and Medicaid, grannies and poor folk in the millions depend on them to keep from starving and beggary.

They are American programs, legislated legally into law.

And neocons like cantor and boehner are literally foaming at their mouths in anticipation of drastically cutting back both these programs.

You can see it in their eyes, that fervent gleam of seeing millions of their fellow Americans fall into poverty, begging at some church’s door for food and shelter, while their true constituents, the elite billionaires, drink champaign, toasting their war-profits.

jomoco
The Federal government takes in about $5 Billion each and every day in routine tax collections. The Social Security and Medicare are only about $2 Billion per day.

So, who is it that is talking about not sending their monthly checks to the Social Security and Medicare recipients?

NOT THE CONSERVATIVES!

It’s Obama who says he can’t guarantee that the Social Security and Medicare checks will be mailed out. Those are his exact words!!!

He’s playing chicken with the American people.

Interest on the national debt is about $1 Billion per day.

Which leaves about $2 Billion per day for the rest of the expenses of the Federal government.

But the Obama spending machine is up around $10 Billion per day and with “Obamacare” will be up around $13 Billion per day.

And none of that is the fault of George Bush.
 
Bush isn’t running for President anymore.
My point was that the hoped for Black Gold,(the hope for the spoils of war) did not happen for your guys. The Government in charge now, is still left holding the bag. (beholden to China for trillions) and your gang is playing games with the debt ceiling??? That party is still in denial…rather sick if you ask me!
Peace,Carlan
 
My point was that the hoped for Black Gold,(the hope for the spoils of war) did not happen for your guys. The Government in charge now, is still left holding the bag. (beholden to China for trillions) and your gang is playing games with the debt ceiling??? That party is still in denial…rather sick if you ask me!
Peace,Carlan
You’re right, they should stop playing games with the debt ceiling. Boehner should tell Obama flatly that the debt ceiling will not be raised, period. Then Congress will have to firgure out how to work with the debt ceiling and the revenues they have. Problem solved… Great idea!!!
 
My point was that the hoped for Black Gold,(the hope for the spoils of war) did not happen for your guys. The Government in charge now, is still left holding the bag. (beholden to China for trillions) and your gang is playing games with the debt ceiling??? That party is still in denial…rather sick if you ask me!
Peace,Carlan
I thought the left criticized Bush, saying the Iraq war was over oil to begin with? Now your saying you wanted him to plunder their oil?

My party isn’t playing games, they are doing exactly what I voted for them to do.
 
I thought the left criticized Bush, saying the Iraq war was over oil to begin with? Now your saying you wanted him to plunder their oil?

My party isn’t playing games, they are doing exactly what I voted for them to do.
Your spin isn’t working, you are not making sense. You don’t get it!

Yep, I know they are bb, we should hope to God they wake up before much longer.
Peace,Carlan
 
I recommend you drop the name calling. The moderators aren’t big fans of people hurling epithets around.
:confused: :okpeople: If you can make a recommendation in response to jomoco using the term, “neocon”. Then allow me to recommend conservatives drop the use of such things as"pinko commies" and as I’ve seen on past threads, “baby killers”. 👍
 
Obamacare already cut it. It included massive cuts to medicare and medicaid
You’re speaking of Obama or Paul Ryan?

When you speak of Obama Medicare cuts, I assume you’re including changes to the private Medicare Advantage program of which the vast majority of Medicare recipients are not particpants in. Most are on traditional Medicare. And changes in reimbursement to providers.

"As the health care debate grinds along many senior citizens are worried that their benefits will be cut to the bone in order to pay for the changes proposed in ObamaCare. Many politicians and pundits have been spreading the doom and gloom vile that these cuts will be made on the backs of senior citizens now receiving Medicare insurance. This is nothing more than political hype.

seniorcorps.org/medicare/how-will-obamacare-affect-medicare/
 
What a dreadful insult to the elected leaders of our country.
Where would you say starting and maintaining two very costly wars, lasting now almost 10years and with no end insight came from ,with no question about how to pay for it, we are still in hock.
And please, for heaven sake don’t spin it!
I remember our then President rallying the nation to go out and spend! spend! spend!
Not to sacrifice and buy war bonds! How??? Just let the future take care of itself,Talk about handing on debt! But NO, HAVE YOU NOT HEARD ABOUT THE SPIOLS OF WAR…LIKE ALL THAT OIL IN IRAQ…HA!HA!
Peace, and I pray! Carlan
I also remember our then President also proclaiming “mission accomplished”. While it was our current President and Commander in Chief, Barack Obama, who commanded the mission to get Osama Bin Laden.
 
Matt, what’s the use?!
Any opposition on this board is not welcome.
Their #1 rule is scuttle them, and use any spin we can come up with, right or wrong.
The principles or policies of any others are not allowed.
We are no longer considering democracy.
Listen,no fodda and they will starve to death.
Carlan
Carlan, :amen:
 
I also remember our then President also proclaiming “mission accomplished”. While it was our current President and Commander in Chief, Barack Obama, who commanded the mission to get Osama Bin Laden.
But, but , but, our previous president brought down Saddma Huessien who was much worse then Osama bin Laden because he insulted his daddy. …and we are still there…go figure
 
But, but , but, our previous president brought down Saddma Huessien who was much worse then Osama bin Laden because he insulted his daddy. …and we are still there…go figure
Well, WMDs and all. Wasting My Dollars.
 
But, but , but, our previous president brought down Saddma Huessien who was much worse then Osama bin Laden because he insulted his daddy. …and we are still there…go figure
:banghead: :ouch: Thank you Sub Rosa for reminding me of that. I forgot insulting the previous President’s papa was worse than masterminding the attacks on 911. :doh2:
 
:banghead: :ouch: Thank you Sub Rosa for reminding me of that. I forgot insulting the previous President’s papa was worse than masterminding the attacks on 911. :doh2:
You can bet your magna cappa / cargo pants on that!
 
But, but , but, our previous president brought down Saddma Huessien who was much worse then Osama bin Laden because he insulted his daddy. …and we are still there…go figure
What a despicable insult to the people tortured and killed under Hussein and his sons.
 
What a despicable insult to the people tortured and killed under Hussein and his sons.
So we should invade and occupy countries where leaders commit these atrocities. Is that the criteria for invading a sovereign nation? ( Clutching my pearls)
 
Hey Kimmie,

They still haven’t answered my question on whether they have mailed in their extra funds to the IRS.

🙂
:rolleyes: I’ve heard of Obama and the Democrats talking about raising taxes on only the upper 2 or 3% percent of incomes. Or above a quarter million dollars a year has been discussed. I’ve even heard higher. If I were at those levels I’d have extra to mail.

The Republican answer no matter how high we set the level: No no no no.
 
So we should invade and occupy countries where leaders commit these atrocities. Is that the criteria for invading a sovereign nation? ( Clutching my pearls)
That’s not what I said is it.

Democrats supported the war till it became politically beneficial to oppose it. You can hold on to the Bush lied people died mantra the rest of your life for all I care. It shows a lack of understanding and knowledge of what’s happened since.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top