M
Mtatum1958
Guest
Why publish this now instead of June 2013?
It is a Catholic news organization, and this is unquestionably Catholic news.Why did the Register make an article on this?
Pope Francis could be guilty of very grave sins if these allegations are true. But that’s still no reason for him to resign or abdicate. If he is guilty, he must repent, confess and then he should do penance commensurate for the sins he had committed. Our Lord will forgive anyone, including a Pope, who is truly repentant about any sins a person chose to commit.Now is time to pray and seek the path of God. It may very well be Pope Francis is innocent although I’m not very hopeful at this point honestly. You all are right. Throughout history we have had some very bad popes. Something more to ponder and pray about
I find the clue being in the “Ex” part. Pope Francis has been beset by temperamental clergy who have been replaced and have struck back at him since the beginning of his papacy. It may be that what these clergy have said may be true and the Pope is a bad person. Or it may be the opposite is true. It may be neither.Why publish this now instead of June 2013?
I get that. My sense is just the opposite, yet let’s face it. It is too soon to know, if we ever do. Until then, to avoid rash judgment, both sides must be given the benefit of the doubt.I pray this isn’t true, but honestly my heart and head tell me that it is.
Some of it seems very much like a testimony to actual events. And then there are other things that seem like speculation or hearsay. I’m curious as to why he is presenting this information now. Is he concerned that the Vatican will take no real action in response to the grand jury report from Pennsylvania?MapleLeaf1 said:Well this might get interesting. I think parts of the letter are stained by bias a bit and some of it is conjecture, but most of the claims should be taken seriously.
This part of his statement felt like gossip, if I’m honest. I absolutely love Archbishop Chaput, was heartbroken when he left Denver, and was shocked when he was not made a Cardinal. But Vigano’s reporting of these conversations with Pope Francis and with McCarrick (and who spoke of ideologizing first) just isn’t as trustworthy, in my opinion, as other sections of his testimony.I’m happy to see that Benedict is somewhat vindicated, and disappointed to hear anything about Cardinal Ouellet. I also feel sorry for Archbishop Chaput if half this stuff is true.
Just because the devil and all the fallen angels are slamming against the Church and have their agents ensconced in the clergy and the laity, does not mean you leave the Church. Furthermore, to reduce one’s faith to mere religious practice rather than the complete transformation of heart is to fall prey to the devil, who also deceived the very religious Pharisees who fasted, and spent all day long in the temple doing religious things.I am seriously considering Orthodox. Maybe the path I have been praying for God to show me is that they have been the true church all along. This is not happening immediately. I am still praying and fasting.