G
*I believe it comes from both parties focusing so much attention on whether or not to tax or not tax those who make less than $250,000.00 and then say they are for the middle class and the poor so it leaves me to believe that these must be what the majority of the voters are making because the majority of the voters are either poor or middle class. Or, to put it more correctly, what we assume or are lead to believe that the majority of the voters are making…I have never heard that $250,000 is the average American salary.Where are you seeing that?
You just can’t help yourself, can you?dailykos.com/story/2012/09/14/1131792/-Mitt-Romney-claims-Middle-Class-income-is-200-250-000-per-year
Sorry, getting old, $200K to $250K. Follow the link.
He was describing the middle class, he was not saying the average person made $250,000“No one can say my plan is going to raise taxes on middle-income people, because principle number one is (to) keep the burden down on middle-income taxpayers… No, middle income is $200,000 to $250,000 and less.”
I need to update my ignore list.Epan is the only one who uses this sort of language around here, unless it is done in jest. He does so for effect, like a child stomping their feet for attention. Best left ignored.
theatlantic.com/business/…-graph/262402/*I Or, to put it more correctly, what we assume or are lead to believe that the majority of the voters are making…
Not sure if that makes any sense…it’s just what I am getting out of everything I am reading and hearing…*
So he said middle class was those making $250,000 or less. Sounds reasonable considering married public school teachers in New York make that.You just can’t help yourself, can you?
He was describing the middle class, he was not saying the average person made $250,000
Sometimes that is said with charity.I can’t speak for your relatives and your own situation but I know I end up with “agree to disagree” when someone uncharitably puts my views down with words such as silly, stupid, naive and nuts.
Read the article, middle of what is the question. $250K is harldy the middle of income earned. I think it more likely represents the top 4 or 5%.You just can’t help yourself, can you?
He was describing the middle class, he was not saying the average person made $250,000
Did you not read the BOLDED section quoted from your own source?Read the article, middle of what is the question. $250K is harldy the middle of income earned. I think it more likely represents the top 4 or 5%.
Question is, can you help yourself. I answer with facts and links, and you throw barbs.
That’s real adult.
What part of $250k OR LESS escapes you?Read the article, middle of what is the question. $250K is harldy the middle of income earned. I think it more likely represents the top 4 or 5%.
Question is, can you help yourself. I answer with facts and links, and you throw barbs.
That’s real adult.
Politico is extremely left wing. Why not quote HuffPo? They have about the same politics?For you and all the other hard-right-wingers here who still cannot get out of their insulated bubble and face reality:
The right’s many attacks on Mitt Romney:
dyn.politico.com/printstory.cfm?uuid=3EF9C70C-59D1-4337-B28E-25DA46E22C7C
Yes I did. I simple answered a question from the previous post about Romney and the $250 issue, no opinion, just a fact.Did you not read the BOLDED section quoted from your own source?
The point is, he never said that $250,000 was the average income of anyone. So you didn’t answer with facts.Read the article, middle of what is the question. $250K is harldy the middle of income earned. I think it more likely represents the top 4 or 5%.
Question is, can you help yourself. I answer with facts and links, and you throw barbs.
That’s real adult.
*Thank you for that even though there is no article when I open the page, but $50K sounds more realistic.theatlantic.com/business/…-graph/262402/
This is the first I found. Read the article, the $50K is the Median income for people in this country.
There aren’t any. It’s hard to elect those imaginary perfect candidates. The Democrat party has sold out completely to the abortion lobby. They aren’t just nibbling around the edges with talk about “women’s healthcare” but claiming at the Convention women should receive unrestricted access to ABORTION (they used the “A” word) REGARDLESS OF ABILITY TO PAY…The incumbent Democrats will appoint pro-death judges. That’s my point. We need to elect pro-life Democrats…
I totally agree. Atheletes, movie stars and corporate presidents make million, that’s where the focus should be. Sorry about the link, I went back and it was down.*Thank you for that even though there is no article when I open the page, but $50K sounds more realistic.
Personally I would love for those who are making the $250,000.00 to $350,000.00 not have to loose there income by being burdened with taxes. To me this will just eventually bring their income down and God knows one can not raise a family well with an income of $50K in todays ecconomy…it would be so nice to just make
The really sad thing is everyone is so focused on the $250,000.00 that they do not realize that this is just pennies to what the “few” are making hand over fist. For some reason the people who make the $250K seem to be taking the punishment for the few who are making well over $250K.*
$250K sounds like a lot (compared to what most of us make) but the problem with targeting such a number is the cost of living and the salary structure varies greatly by location. $250K in New York City is a completely different situation from $250K in Bismarck North Dakota. If the Dems truly want to tax “the rich” they need a lot higher threshold than $250K although that’s the magic number. Further while it plays into Obama’s class warfare game we do not “tax the rich” but we do heavily tax those who work for wages and salaries. Seems rather bass-ackwards to me if you want to encourage people to support themselves.*Thank you for that even though there is no article when I open the page, but $50K sounds more realistic.
Personally I would love for those who are making the $250,000.00 to $350,000.00 not have to loose there income by being burdened with taxes. To me this will just eventually bring their income down and God knows one can not raise a family well with an income of $50K in todays ecconomy…it would be so nice to just make
The really sad thing is everyone is so focused on the $250,000.00 that they do not realize that this is just pennies to what the “few” are making hand over fist. For some reason the people who make the $250K seem to be taking the punishment for the few who are making well over $250K.*
If it was intentional why would I attach a link. My personal opinion is posted below, at 10:52, I believe number 546The point is, he never said that $250,000 was the average income of anyone. So you didn’t answer with facts.
But when asked, you pulled this quote as proof. Somehow forgetting that the quote included “or less.” Either you cut it off intentionally or not. Which was it?
If it was intentional, it seems quite obvious that you can’t help but to mangle what Romney says. If it wasn’t intentional, I do apologize, but also need to say that you need to check your sources a little better.
The fact is he said middle income was $250,000 to $200,000 or less. Would you consider $10,000 to high? Because it is less than $250,000.Yes I did. I simple answered a question from the previous post about Romney and the $250 issue, no opinion, just a fact.