Romney stands by message in secret video

  • Thread starter Thread starter oldcelt
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
I hope Romney does stand by his message; it will be the first time he has stood by anything he said. The part that got me was when he said that Obama voters think they’re entitled to everything, including food, housing, and health care. Are Americans–the (working) poor, elderly, disabled–not entitled to the basic necessities of life? To be fair, however, I’m sure he meant they are not entitled to government handouts. Still, it was a chilling comment. And is it really true that 47% of Americans don’t pay any income tax? How about other taxes?
Just about everybody pays sales taxes at the point of purchases and wrapped up in the sales price of the item, I heard this accounts for about 60% of the government’s tax revenue.
 
Ok, you asked, to paraphrase, should “all citizens look to the government for their basic needs to be met”.

No, of course not. But many citizens are legitimately vulnerable for a variety of reasons. We should expect our government to look out for the unborn, the vulnerable, the “least of these”

It is basic Christian values and morality that a country that was founded on Judeo-Christian values and morality should up hold and fight for.

From the unborn, to the least of these.
The Church does not require the government to take care of “the least of these,” however both parties, Romney included, believe in a social safety net. The issue is how big the net needs to be. The Democrat net is all-encompassing and drags our economy to the bottom of the ocean. The good news, is that we’ll all be together when we drown.
 
No way Christ said “the least of these” should be protected by government.
Yes, it’s YOUR duty, not the government’s.
So the government shouldnt protect the unborn or the vulnerable?!?!?!!?!?!?!?!!?!?!?!

:eek:
 
Just about everybody pays sales taxes at the point of purchases and wrapped up in the sales price of the item, I heard this accounts for about 60% of the government’s tax revenue.
Romney distinctly used the term “INCOME TAX.”
 
No way Christ said “the least of these” should be protected by government.
Yes, it’s YOUR duty, not the government’s.
I suggest you do a search of all the saints of the Church who held positions of leadership/government. They (to the best of my knowledge) all acknowledge an individual AND a collective responsibility for the ‘least of these’.
 
The government has the same DUTY as society, to ensure that all people’s basic needs are being attended to. That does not mean it has to personally provide all those needs, but it has to ensure that there is a way for people to meet them. For example, that is why government assists many charities in providing for the poor/vulnerable, in addition to having programs of its own: that is one of the DUTIES of government.
This is something that Democrats and Republicans, Romney included, agree on. 🤷

Now, how we do it and how “basic needs” equates to nearly half the populace not paying income taxes is another question.
 
So Romney attacks the lazy bums living off of welfare. The kind I see in Illinois all the time. The types that fill their grocery carts up with food (I’m talking to the brim) and get in line in front of me. Then when they go to pay (and I’ve seen this more than once by the way) and they’ll reach into their pocket and pull out a big wad of cash and go, “oh yeah” and put it away. Out comes the Illinois Link Card. On behalf of all taxpayers everywhere, you are welcome Mr. drug dealer. God Bless.
I like when people speak their thoughts honestly.
 
Protecting is not the same as supporting them.
I don’t get how people (conservatives) who care so much about what they will leave to their grandchildren, seem to be less concerned with the people LIVING TODAY who worked and contributed all their lives so that those employed today could have something to build on. And to think that before the mid-terms we were scaring grandmas with stories of death panels?! 😦
 
Just about everybody pays sales taxes at the point of purchases and wrapped up in the sales price of the item, I heard this accounts for about 60% of the government’s tax revenue.
As well as state and local taxes, property taxes, social security taxes, unemployment insurance taxes, etc. Even people who receive government assistance AND work part-time pay taxes.
 
Don’t you think its odd that those Americans who are in the biggest uproar over Mitt Romney’s 47% who don’t pay taxes, forget to take into consideration that the biggest chunk of that 47% are multi-millionaire’s and billionaires who never pay a red cent? When push comes to shove people and most certainly politicians are always quick to blame the poor and the homeless for the country economic woes.

I’m not an American so any opinion I give is just added void in a windstorm. Besides; I was never big up on any politician or leader. When it comes down to brass tax their all for the richest of the rich anyway.
The bottom 50% earned 12% of personal income and paid 3% of income tax total say IRS 2007. Richest 1% earned 22% of national personal income but paid 40% of all personal income taxes. Top 5% earners earned 37% and paid 61% income tax. The top 10% earned 48% and paid 71% of all income taxes so how do not pay a cent? The top 1% of earners are paying more income tax than the bottom 50% of earners
 
As well as state and local taxes, property taxes, social security taxes, unemployment insurance taxes, etc. Even people who receive government assistance AND work part-time pay taxes.
Again, Romney clearly said “income tax.”
 
The top 1% of earners are paying more income tax than the bottom 50% of earners
Great. Now tell us what the top 1% is earning as compared to the bottom 50%. It’s called INCOME tax for a reason: loopholes aside, you pay based on the amount you make.
 
Although that’s not what I took out of this statement, I have to add:

My 89 year old mom pays taxes. She owns a business that employs three people. She doesn’t take a salary. She pays taxes on money she is taking out of her IRA.

She is favorably impressed with this statement.
Good for her. Maybe we should bring back the poorhouse: feed them, clothe them, house them, WORK them - no age limits, no exceptions…:rolleyes:
 
Great. Now tell us what the top 1% is earning as compared to the bottom 50%. It’s called INCOME tax for a reason: loopholes aside, you pay based on the amount you make.
I thought she covered that:
The bottom 50% earned 12% of personal income and paid 3% of income tax total say IRS 2007. Richest 1% earned 22% of national personal income but paid 40% of all personal income taxes.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top