M
MagdalenaRita
Guest
Thanks @De_Maria. I like that. It is a very good explanation.
The Catholic Teaching which I speak of, is for adults.TULIPed:
I was very un-righteous and un-obedient before my baptism. (I was 4 months old I think.)
At four months? I don’t guess you’ve ever had children. At four months, most children can only eat and sleep.And you probably were a stinker!
That’s the ticket. But for you, at 21, you would have had to undergo RCIA in order to be baptized a Catholic. Even if your parents were Catholic. Since at that point, you’re an adult and must prove that you understand what you’re getting involved with.And I was twice then, again at 21.
Of course a few might say your parents and godparents and parish/ church were righteous and obedient for you.
That’s not arrogance you’re hearing. Jesus came to reveal God and while we can never come close to comprehending Him in His totality, we still can know Him. And the God that strictly determines man’s choices regarding salvation would be an evil clown, worse than satan, not the God revealed by Jesus, not a god worth following. And everyone likes to quote Rom 9:20 when someone disagrees with their concept of God BTW.I shake my head at the readiness among certain Catholics to define under which circumstances they think God would be a “tyrant,” “evil,” “sadist,” “unjust,” etc. If God’s salvific plan does not fit your expectations, then He is a “fool”? The arrogance contained in such a statement is astounding. Paul’s words “who are you, a human being, to talk back to God” (Rom. 9:20) come to my mind.
And what knowledge?-that God created a bunch of sinners and decided to save some of them anyway? And now we know? Wow. Either way, yes, it’s possible to be perfected in this life, as one is willing and remains in communion with God, giving up all this life offers in order to serve Him as part of that desire. As the Church teaches, God doesn’t command what is impossible for us to do even as the Holy Spirit is essential in helping accomplish it. But the Church also teaches that few will go to that extent and so most won’t be perfected before death. So God isn’t demanding that we totally overcome the struggle, to necessarily completely win the battle against sin even if that’s the ideal. But He’s looking for us to strive towards that end. He’s looking for us to be winning that battle, to invest our talents and reap an increase, to grow in ownership of the grace and righteousness that He grants to those who hunger and thirst for it, to refrain from sin so grave that it constitutes a complete turning away from love of God and/or neighbor, to feed the hungry and clothe the naked and do the works He’s prepared for us to do, etc.Let me tell you right away that you will never be inherently perfect in this life by your “struggle” (whatever you mean by that). Christ has already perfected us by His sacrifice (Heb. 10:14).
He gave us this life in a world characterized by sin, suffering, and death for us to fully understand His grace, which He bestows on His sinful people. He tells us, “My grace is sufficient for you, for my power is made perfect in weakness” (2 Cor. 12:9). He is strong when we are weak and imperfect. If He would have directly placed us in Heaven as transformed and perfect people, then that knowledge would never have been obtained.
I never even hinted that forgiveness is insignificant-only that God has more in store for us than that. And to be honest the rest of your statement comes across as a sort of exercise in priggish ignorance. Jesus died not only so we may be forgiven, but so that we may become like Him. God’s plan isn’t to merely save a few otherwise worthless wretches and condemn the rest but to elevate His beloved creation to the purpose and potential He created us for, as we’re willing because the will of man is the prize ever since Eden. Otherwise none of the drama that’s unfolded in human history from Eden on, with God patiently working within that history, had any purpose.The Gospel is not merely about forgiveness (as if that would be something insignificant as such)—it is about Christ, the Son of God, having suffered a painful and ignominious death for our salvation, and having been raised to the glory that He now shares with His Father. And you seem to think that this by itself is not “enough”?!
Only with His help-then I don’t need luck; I just need to remain in Him and cooperate by doing His will. He’s a wise and good God in that case. You should contemplate more on Rom 9:20. In the true understanding of the faith we cannot be saved without Him, but we can still refuse to be saved by Him. or walk away again at any time later on.So instead of putting your faith in the One who has saved you, you are intent on working yourself into Heaven. If that would not be the goal of your life, then God would be a “fool” and even “evil.” Good luck
Does that mean that you have stopped sinning? Because you are not telling me that you do not practice what you preach, right? And please don’t give me the “I’m doing my best” that I so often hear from Catholic apologists. “Doing one’s best” does not equal obedience. “Struggling” does not equal obedience. Only the actual keeping of God’s commands counts as obedience.God has now empowered us to overcome the sin that separates us from Him by its nature.
So why do you sin? Frankly speaking, this discussion is just a waste of time since it will be the ordinary merry-go-round of baseless claims that Protestants teach a truncated gospel, while you will search for all kinds of excuses for not yet having obtained that additional “bonus” that God apparently has in store, and for not yet being so “empowered” that you have stopped sinning etc. Good day, sir.Should we mock Him by sinning?
The reason why I quoted Rom. 9:20 is because you are arguing just like Paul’s imaginary interlocutor. “How could God do X?” You are plainly saying that if God acts in a certain way, then He is even worse than Satan. So you have determined how God should act in order to be “a god worth following”. This is nothing short of potential atheism. “My way or the highway.” Tell you what: God does what He wants. It is not up to you to tell Him how to be good.And the God that strictly determines man’s choices regarding salvation would be an evil clown, worse than satan, not the God revealed by Jesus, not a god worth following. And everyone likes to quote Rom 9:20 when someone disagrees with their concept of God BTW.
Ummmm, you left out one more thing that babies do…lol… that is if you’ve ever had childrenAt four months? ( stinker) I don’t guess you’ve ever had children. At four months, most children can only eat and sleep
Oh yes, I am with you, and then beyond…that is before baptism one is more than righteous, as in born again, professing the Lord, even indwelt by the Spirit to do so…and to counter wrong idea of perfection or righteous, I still smoked cigarettes and had other human failings.So, are you saying, that at 21, if you were an unrepentant, drug addicted, drunkard, you would have been allowed to receive Baptism in your church? You would not have been expected to provide some proof of your faith?
Whatever God judges to be sufficient based on what we did with whatever we were given counts as the obedience He requires. And that obedience comes only from the love He’s wrought in us, with our cooperation. Faith was never intended to be a get-out-of hell-regardless-what-we-do-free-card , or a license to sin. Shades of Is 5:20 drift into mind here. Faith is the means to righteousness, not the freedom or escape from fulfilling it. Once righteousness is divorced from…true righteousness, then we’ve succeeded in corrupting the gospel beyond belief. As Augustine put it, “Without love faith may indeed exist, but avails nothing”.Does that mean that you have stopped sinning? Because you are not telling me that you do not practice what you preach, right? And please don’t give me the “I’m doing my best” that I so often hear from Catholic apologists. “Doing one’s best” does not equal obedience. “Struggling” does not equal obedience. Only the actual keeping of God’s commands counts as obedience.
Whether or not I sin is irrelevant to whether or not we must be winning that battle against it, and whether or not we can win it with the help of grace. The gospel is determined by God; I’m not the standard. But either way you already know what Scripture says about sinners and whether or not they’ll enter the kingdom, where the kind of grave sin that opposes love in people are listed. You’re free to heed God’s word-or not-as we all are.So why do you sin? Frankly speaking, this discussion is just a waste of time since it will be the ordinary merry-go-round of baseless claims that Protestants teach a truncated gospel, while you will search for all kinds of excuses for not yet having obtained that additional “bonus” that God apparently has in store, and for not yet being so “empowered” that you have stopped sinning etc. Good day, sir.
pot meet kettle. Either way, I’m not telling Him what He should want, or what constitutes goodness for Him; He’s revealed that.The reason why I quoted Rom. 9:20 is because you are arguing just like Paul’s imaginary interlocutor. “How could God do X?” You are plainly saying that if God acts in a certain way, then He is even worse than Satan. So you have determined how God should act in order to be “a god worth following”. This is nothing short of potential atheism. “My way or the highway.” Tell you what: God does what He wants. It is not up to you to tell Him how to be good.
He’d be worse than satan if He created and predestined anyone to eternal torment without regard to their will, if they were made such that they could not help but sin IOW. Then all evils that ever transpired in this world would be directly willed and caused by Him, and for what reason should we then trust such a god?So God shows mercy to those He wants to show mercy, and He hardens those He wants to harden. Is He “worse than Satan” for doing what He wants?
That’s a good point of contrast. Before baptism, the person has responded to God’s call and begun to see his own wretchedness. He begins to detest sin and to love God’s laws and thus begins to act righteously, keeping the Law of God. At this point, he requests baptism. And seeing his faith, God counts it to him as righteousness. Then, grants him the gift of the Holy Spirit, which is the washing of regeneration and he is born again. See Trent VI.Oh yes, I am with you, and then beyond…that is before baptism one is more than righteous, as in born again, professing the Lord, even indwelt by the Spirit to do so…and to counter wrong idea of perfection or righteous, I still smoked cigarettes and had other human failings.
You forget, we have one judge. I’ll give you 5 guesses who He is. Hint: It’s not you.Does that mean that you have stopped sinning? Because you are not telling me that you do not practice what you preach, right? And please don’t give me the “I’m doing my best” that I so often hear from Catholic apologists. “Doing one’s best” does not equal obedience. “Struggling” does not equal obedience. Only the actual keeping of God’s commands counts as obedience
Because sin in the flesh is at war with our spirit.So why do you sin?
Sooo, you’ve stopped sinning? Let me remind what Scripture says:Frankly speaking, this discussion is just a waste of time since it will be the ordinary merry-go-round of baseless claims that Protestants teach a truncated gospel, while you will search for all kinds of excuses for not yet having obtained that additional “bonus” that God apparently has in store, and for not yet being so “empowered” that you have stopped sinning etc. Good day, sir.
We are being changed:Does that mean that you have stopped sinning? Because you are not telling me that you do not practice what you preach, right? And please don’t give me the “I’m doing my best” that I so often hear from Catholic apologists. “Doing one’s best” does not equal obedience. “Struggling” does not equal obedience. Only the actual keeping of God’s commands counts as obedience.
For I know nothing by myself; yet am I not hereby justified: but he that judgeth me is the Lord.My conscience is clear, but that does not make me innocent. It is the Lord who judges me.
And I do not disagree with that. But when someone claims that the Gospel is “more” than Christ being crucified and risen for our salvation, I have to object. And when someone claims that God will empower us so that we may no longer sin, I think it is highly pertinent to ask: so why have you not stopped sinning? What is the obstacle?We are being changed:
And the word of God is very clear: only obedience counts as obedience. Doing “one’s best”, but still failing to keep the commandments, does not count as obedience. Anything to the contrary is “easy obeyism” and self-delusion.Whatever God judges to be sufficient based on what we did with whatever we were given counts as the obedience He requires.
No, but the cross of Christ was. He saved us in our ungodliness and brought us from death to life, from condemnation to justification. So you believe that certain sins may undo what Christ accomplished on the cross? Because He bore our sins in His body on the cross, no?Faith was never intended to be a get-out-of hell-regardless-what-we-do-free-card
I think this expression says more about the objector than about those who adhere to sola fide. It sounds like if the objectors would be fully unleashed, they would go on sinning as if there were no tomorrow. Sola fide is not a “license to sin” any more than your sacrament of confession is.or a license to sin
And if he has said that, my response is simply that he got it wrong. We have not been saved because we have loved. We have been saved through faith despite being ungodly and miserably selfish.As Augustine put it, “Without love faith may indeed exist, but avails nothing”.
… or else what? So you do not believe that Christ has already won the battle against sin for you? Seriously? What does Christ really mean to your salvation? You will never stop sinning in this life—that I can tell you with complete certainty. So what battle do you expect to win?Whether or not I sin is irrelevant to whether or not we must be winning that battle against it, and whether or not we can win it with the help of grace.
We are all sinners, and the wages of sin—all sin—is death. Even calling one’s brother or sister “you fool” makes us liable to hell. So where does that put us?The gospel is determined by God; I’m not the standard. But either way you already know what Scripture says about sinners and whether or not they’ll enter the kingdom, where the kind of grave sin that opposes love in people are listed.
I find this perspective interesting. You do not seem to have an issue with the notion of eternal torment per se, but only the kind that involves predestination. By the way, do you believe that God wants to harden some people? Because that is a biblical teaching.He’d be worse than satan if He created and predestined anyone to eternal torment without regard to their will, if they were made such that they could not help but sin IOW.
I didn’t read where anyone said they no longer sin. It seems to me you were responding to someone saying that “God has empowered us to overcome the sin that separates us from Him by it’s nature” and “man cannot be righteous apart from God” It take nothing away from His passion, death and resurrection. We are to be overcomers.nd when someone claims that God will empower us so that may no longer sin, I think it is highly pertinent to ask: so why have you not stopped sinning? What is the obstacle?
He is talking about OT Mosaic law. Are you saying we do not have to do what Jesus instructed?“Cursed is everyone who does not continue to do everything written in the Book of the Law.” (Gal. 3:10)
Yes He did. You’re right.He saved us in our ungodliness and brought us from death to life, from condemnation to justification.
There is sin which is deadly. 1 JohnSo you believe that certain sins may undo what Christ accomplished on the cross
That is exactly my point. The claim was made in this very thread that God may empower us to keep His commandments. So the question that immediately presents itself is why a person with that belief has not overcome his/her sins and stopped sinning altogether.I didn’t read where anyone said they no longer sin.
What do you mean by “overcomers”? That you will one day be able to appear in this thread and claim “I am no longer sinning”? Are we not already overcomers in Christ? Has He not already saved you from sin?It seems to me you were responding to someone saying that “God has empowered us to overcome the sin that separates us from Him by it’s nature” and “ man cannot be righteous apart from God ” It take nothing away from His passion, death and resurrection. We are to be overcomers.
I am not reading anything into anything. I am just pointing out the discrepancy between theory and practice. Catholics claim that God will empower us to overcome sin, yet no one can make the claim not to be a sinner. So it seems that everyone has postponed the moment they are supposed to become empowered and stop sinning.In all charity, are you reading more into some of the comments than what is there or maybe looking for something that isn’'t there?.
You mean, believe in Him and love one another?Are you saying we do not have to do what Jesus instructed?
The wages of sin is death (Rom. 6:23). Not just one particular sin, but sin.There is sin which is deadly. 1 John
So by “rejecting” what Christ did (however we may do that), we can undo what He accomplished?Nothing undoes what Christ did but we have free will to reject what Christ did.
Well, certainly not where love trumps faith. Unbelief hinders the kingdom more than hate, likewise as what put Him on the cross.Are you saying we do not have to do what Jesus instructed?