The Case for Impeachment Is Overwhelming | The American Conservative

  • Thread starter Thread starter dvdjs
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
How have you missed the message?
Which one?
Among all of the unsubstantiated numbers in the post, it is worth noting that Trump’s approval is now lower at this point in the presidency than all former presidents back to and including Truman - including Jimmy Carter .
And yet he still looks like a better than even bet to win re-election.
 
Last edited:
The support of this corrupt president.
The proposition that Trump is corrupt is strongly lacking in anything approaching actual evidence. There is certainly far more evidence that his opponent was corrupt, and the Horowitz report seems to suggest quite a bit of corruption in the administration of his predecessor. Imagine the outrage if Trump was running an FBI intelligence op on Biden, Warren, or Sanders…
 
Last edited:
The proposition that Trump is corrupt
Trump requested and pressured foreign government to involve themselves in our affairs, not for the sake of the nation but for the purpose of advancing his candidacy in 2020. That is corruption. And that, to the founders is an impeachable offense of the first order.
 
Last edited:
Trump requested and pressured foreign government to involve themselves in our affairs, not for the sake of the nation but for the purpose of advancing his candidacy om 2020. That is corruption.
There’s no actual evidence this happened, even after weeks of testimony. All you have is speculation from a bunch of Clinton donors…
Trump Foundation.
There’s a possibility you may have misspelled “Clinton” here…
 
Last edited:
There’s a possibility you may have misspelled “Clinton” here…
This is what is so distressing about the current state of Trump supporters.

Last month, a judge ordered Trump to pay $2 million in damages. James’ office had originally pushed for $2.8 million in restitution and a $5.6 million penalty. As part of the settlement, Trump admitted to misusing Trump Foundation funds and agreed to limitations and restrictions on future charitable work.

 
This is what is so distressing about the current state of Trump supporters.
How very true. They distort, deflect and deny everything that casts the smallest “shadow” on their glorified and snow-white leader - who was directly installed by God.
 
There’s no actual evidence this happened
There is plenty of actual evidence.
Some seem to think that unless an explicit articulation of the scheme was recorded, there is no :actual evidence". But as the serious law professionals involved will quickly point out, that kind of evidence essentially never exists in these matter.
 
This is what is so distressing about the current state of Trump supporters.
How very true. They distort, deflect and deny everything that casts the smallest “shadow” on their glorified and snow-white leader - who was directly installed by God.
This is what I find most distressing about Trump’s haters. They do their best, whether intentionally or not, to communicate that they real target of their hate is not Trump, but us.
 
Last edited:
The American Conservative was founded by Pat Buchanan and PanagiotisTaki Theodoracopulos (Taki magazine) and Scott McConnell


Other pieces he has written:

https://www.theamericanconservative.com/larison/

Also, writes or has written for globalresearch.ca , that’s a bit of a far out website from what I’ve seen. However, I am not saying that makes it wrong by any means. I will study all of this more.

But there are questions about him, one article “the cruelty of Venezuelan sanctions”, well, I haven’t heard they are so bad and the people probably want them as well as the opposition. So, this is pretty weak in my view. I think I have some understanding of him.
 
Last edited:
As someone here is fond of saying” facts are stubborn” and Indeed they are. It’s on.y a matter of time when said person will have to concede this point. 2+2 doesn’t equal five as much as the Dems want to push that delusion
 
This is what I find most distressing about Trump’s haters. They do their best, whether intentionally or not, to communicate that they real target of their hate is not Trump, but us.
As a matter of fact you are wrong on both counts. I do not “hate” Trump, merely despise him. And I most definitely do not “hate” you, I am disappointed at your attitude. There are some Trump supporters who know and despise Trump, but since he is their own “rabid dog”, they are willing to overlook his shenanigans. They agree that he has many faults (very serious ones) but deny that those faults are impeachable. All that because they like some of his actions.
 
Synonyms aren’t necessarily interchangeable. What are you trying to prove?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top