The Fear of Hell

  • Thread starter Thread starter Charlemagne_III
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
If it’s not a reply why don’t you refute it?

No reasonable person believes we can know precisely what happens after death but we have plenty of evidence as to what happens in this life. Can you explain why our virtues don’t bring their own reward and our vices don’t incur their own punishment? Does being proud, selfish, lazy, greedy, impatient, envious, jealous or callous make us happy and endear us to other people? Failure to answer that question destroys the credibility of your scepticism.

This thread is certainly a waste of time for those who ignore what others have written, e.g. “deserves torturing” implies that it isn’t self-inflicted - which is the fundamental objection to your rejection of hell.
Do you think that us mere mortals here on earth should be totally unconcerned if someone was in “self-inflicted” torture here on earth?

Don’t you think that God would want us to maybe make some kind of effort to help this person?

Why should all caring leave us once we get to what many call heaven?

This is merely my opinion but I do NOT think that God has created anyone that is beyond the “cleaning-up” ability, so to speak, of God.

Could be why God came up with a Plan even before creation and why going to the cross was/is such a central part of God’s Plan.
 
I think you are adding quite a bit to JP2’s statement. Firstly, it’s not “ONLY” a possibility. But simply: a possibility.

Secondly, it’s not “nothing but” a possibility. But simply: a possibility.

Imagine if your child asked you, “Daddy Bradski, if lie under a bike ramp while someone jumps over me, is it possible for him to smash my head?”

You respond, “Yes, dearest child o’ mine. It’s always a possibility”.

He concludes: “My daddy doesn’t even think it’s possible for me to get my head smashed! He said it’s ONLY a possibility. And! He said it’s ‘nothing but’ a possibility! I think that means that he says there’s no possible way I’m going to get hurt! Let’s do it!”

Off to the street he goes…

http://www.dumpaday.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/07/dumb-people-doing-dumb-things-dumpaday-23.jpg
He got a lot of air just using a head.
 
I think you are adding quite a bit to JP2’s statement. Firstly, it’s not “ONLY” a possibility. But simply: a possibility.

Secondly, it’s not “nothing but” a possibility. But simply: a possibility.

Imagine if your child asked you, “Daddy Bradski, if lie under a bike ramp while someone jumps over me, is it possible for him to smash my head?”

You respond, “Yes, dearest child o’ mine. It’s always a possibility”.

He concludes: “My daddy doesn’t even think it’s possible for me to get my head smashed! He said it’s ONLY a possibility. And! He said it’s ‘nothing but’ a possibility! I think that means that he says there’s no possible way I’m going to get hurt! Let’s do it!”

Off to the street he goes…

http://www.dumpaday.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/07/dumb-people-doing-dumb-things-dumpaday-23.jpg
Doesn’t look like the guy in the red t-shirt got his head smashed so maybe God really did come up with a catholic Plan of Salvation.
 
Tom Baum,

Do you believe or do you deny that some people will go to an eternal hell? :confused:
 
Thats not what he said… he said it was expanded for those who reject him
(human wise).
People send themselves there, they were not sent there by God unlike Satan and his fallen. don’t put words in God’s mouth. Not wise. If hell was created for people then why not say that? Why not say hell was prepared for the devil his fallen angels and those who reject God instead of just Satan and his fallen angels? why only say half the truth? Half the truth is deception… Satan is the Father of Deception not GOD.
If hell was created for people, then why Jesus?
I bow to your superior wisdom! 👍
 
Tom Baum;12942407 [QUOTE said:
]Do you think that us mere mortals here on earth should be totally unconcerned if someone was in “self-inflicted” torture here on earth?
Don’t you think that God would want us to maybe make some kind of effort to help this person?
Why should all caring leave us once we get to what many call heaven?
This is merely my opinion but I do NOT think that God has created anyone that is beyond the “cleaning-up” ability, so to speak, of God.
Could be why God came up with a Plan even before creation and why going to the cross was/is such a central part of God’s Plan.
  1. Can God compel us to go to heaven?
  2. Are we are incapable of choosing to be totally independent?
  3. Is Christ’s teaching about the sheep and the goats false?
  4. Can we force those who choose to be totally independent to change their mind?
  5. Did Jesus ever say everyone goes to heaven? If not why not?
 
I think you are adding quite a bit to JP2’s statement.
I’ve quoted him in full. There’s no fudging. No paraphrasing. It’s there verbatim.

We could run this as a poll:

Do you think that
A. Hell definitely exists.
B. Hell remains a probability.
C. Hell remains a possibility.
D. Hell does not exist.

John Paul sucks the end of his pencil, thinks for a moment, then ticks D.

This thread is certainly a waste of time for those who ignore what others have written, e.g. “deserves torturing” implies that it isn’t self-inflicted - which is the fundamental objection to your rejection of hell.
OK, so nobody deserves to go to hell. Is that your position? Anyone else can still answer who they think deserves the punishment, but can I now ask if you know any sane person who would choose to be tortured for that ten year period?

Can you tell me if it is at all credible in any way whatsoever that anyone would make a conscious decision to self inflict ten years of pain on themselves, knowing what the punishment was going to be?

Maybe what you mean is that they choose evil, and therefore end up in hell. But that again implies a punishment. The same as a man who is imprisoned for theft. We can say he brought it upon himself by choosing to steal. But a few years in the slammer seems like a reasonable privacy to pay. What sin deserves just ten years of torment?

Again, I’m calling everyone out on this. ‘It’s eternal torment’ says everyone. ‘It exists’ says everyone (well, except those who aren’t 100%sure and still regard it as a ‘possibility’) but I get the forum equivalent of a blank stare when I ask people to actually think about what it is meant to entail.

We have a plant’s worth of evil from which to pick somebody who might deserve hell. Child rapists, mass murderers, genocidal maniacs - there’s no end of potential members of the hell-fire club. But no-one, literally no-one, can bring themselves to nominate even one single person for just a brief few years of agony. And why?

Well, the reason is blazingly and monstrously simple. None of us are sadists. None of us are psychopaths. Everyone talks the talk, but no-one dares walk the walk because, obviously, it would make you less than human to do so.

Love your enemies. I recall that being said somewhere. But we all need to feel that warm glow of righteous retribution. We all need to know that a bad deed will reap it’s own reward. We all want to believe that no-one gets away with it! And if not in this world, then dammit, in the next. Hence hell.

But it can’t just be separation from God. Those who don’t believe in Him could care less. It can’t simply be non-existence because those who don’t believe in Him expect nothing more. But the rhetoric, the fire and brimstone threats have been cranked up to such an extent that it becomes, not just unbelievable, but inhuman. Sadistic. Too horrifying to contemplate. Too horrifying for anyone to be able to nominate any single person who deserves it.

And I’m very pleased indeed that no-one has.
 
Maybe what you mean is that they choose evil, and therefore end up in hell. But that again implies a punishment. The same as a man who is imprisoned for theft. We can say he brought it upon himself by choosing to steal. But a few years in the slammer seems like a reasonable privacy to pay. What sin deserves just ten years of torment?
My guess the sin is the sin against the Holy Spirit, which Jesus said would not be forgiven neither in this world nor in the next.

And I’m betting that sin is the sin of unbelief … ATHEISM if we die railing against God… by far the dumbest move anybody could make.
 
My guess the sin is the sin against the Holy Spirit, which Jesus said would not be forgiven neither in this world nor in the next.

And I’m betting that sin is the sin of unbelief … ATHEISM if we die railing against God… by far the dumbest move anybody could make.
Kinda foolish railing against God if you don’t believe in Him. Like being angry at Santa if you didn’t get that power saw of Mas that you wanted.

But do we have a sort of answer? Do atheists deserve eternal punishment? How about just for ten years? Is that reasonable?
 
OK, so nobody deserves to go to hell. Is that your position?
Only God knows the answer but it is a possibility; otherwise we wouldn’t have been warned about it.
Anyone else can still answer who they think deserves the punishment, but can I now ask if you know any sane person who would choose to be tortured for that ten year period?
Time doesn’t exist in the spiritual life.
Can you tell me if it is at all credible in any way whatsoever that anyone would make a conscious decision to self inflict ten years of pain on themselves, knowing what the punishment was going to be?
Even in this world many people willingly endure extreme pain to achieve their goal, such is the power of the human mind.
Maybe what you mean is that they choose evil, and therefore end up in hell. But that again implies a punishment. The same as a man who is imprisoned for theft. We can say he brought it upon himself by choosing to steal. But a few years in the slammer seems like a reasonable privacy to pay. What sin deserves just ten years of torment?
Time doesn’t exist in the spiritual life but choosing to live solely for oneself is not subject to any limits, such is the possibility of the lust for power
Again, I’m calling everyone out on this. ‘It’s eternal torment’ says everyone. ‘It exists’ says everyone (well, except those who aren’t 100%sure and still regard it as a ‘possibility’) but I get the forum equivalent of a blank stare when I ask people to actually think about what it is meant to entail.
Hell consists of extreme hardship willingly endured to obtain a kingdom of one’s own.
We have a plant’s worth of evil from which to pick somebody who might deserve hell. Child rapists, mass murderers, genocidal maniacs - there’s no end of potential members of the hell-fire club. But no-one, literally no-one, can bring themselves to nominate even one single person for just a brief few years of agony. And why?
They are wise because - apart from the fact that time doesn’t exist in the spiritual life - it is impossible for anyone except God to know to what extent anyone is responsible for his or her actions.
Well, the reason is blazingly and monstrously simple. None of us are sadists. None of us are psychopaths. Everyone talks the talk, but no-one dares walk the walk because, obviously, it would make you less than human to do so.
Love your enemies. I recall that being said somewhere. But we all need to feel that warm glow of righteous retribution. We all need to know that a bad deed will reap it’s own reward. We all want to believe that no-one gets away with it! And if not in this world, then dammit, in the next. Hence hell.
A good example of the genetic fallacy! What people want to believe has no bearing on reality.
But it can’t just be separation from God. Those who don’t believe in Him could care less.

Non-belief doesn’t imply the non-existence of God.
It can’t simply be non-existence because those who don’t believe in Him expect nothing more.

It isn’t non-existence because what people believe or don’t believe doesn’t constitute reality.
But the rhetoric, the fire and brimstone threats have been cranked up to such an extent that it becomes, not just unbelievable, but inhuman. Sadistic. Too horrifying to contemplate. Too horrifying for anyone to be able to nominate any single person who deserves it.
The distortion of Christ’s teaching doesn’t mean hell doesn’t exist.
And I’m very pleased indeed that no-one has.
So am I, Brad! Some people seem to relish the misfortunes of others. That in itself deserves punishment - in purgatory not hell!🙂
 
I’ve quoted him in full. There’s no fudging. No paraphrasing. It’s there verbatim.

We could run this as a poll:

Do you think that
A. Hell definitely exists.
B. Hell remains a probability.
C. Hell remains a possibility.
D. Hell does not exist.

John Paul sucks the end of his pencil, thinks for a moment, then ticks D.
No, Bradski.

And I’d be very, very careful about positing this again in the future because it is an absolute falsehood.

He has NOT said that “hell does not exist”. The quote you offered states that the Holy Father declares: “Eternal damnation remains a possibility, but we are not granted, without special divine revelation, the knowledge of whether or which human beings are effectively involved in it.”

That is not even close to saying “hell does not exist.”

I suggest you retract this.
 
Kinda foolish railing against God if you don’t believe in Him.
Blasphemy against the Holy Spirit is simply another way for saying, “I refuse to soften my heart to receive Him”.

It’s not at all “railing against God”.
 
No, Bradski.

And I’d be very, very careful about positing this again in the future because it is an absolute falsehood.

He has NOT said that “hell does not exist”. The quote you offered states that the Holy Father declares: “Eternal damnation remains a possibility, but we are not granted, without special divine revelation, the knowledge of whether or which human beings are effectively involved in it.”

That is not even close to saying “hell does not exist.”

I suggest you retract this.
I love me my Mark Shea:

What Pope JP2 really said about hell:

ncregister.com/blog/mark-shea/john-paul-ii-heaven-and-hell
 
No, Bradski.

And I’d be very, very careful about positing this again in the future because it is an absolute falsehood.

He has NOT said that “hell does not exist”. The quote you offered states that the Holy Father declares: “Eternal damnation remains a possibility, but we are not granted, without special divine revelation, the knowledge of whether or which human beings are effectively involved in it.”

That is not even close to saying “hell does not exist.”

I suggest you retract this.
My apologies! I’m so sorry, I put the wrong letter down. Of course I meant to say C, which was the whole point of making the list so it would reflect what he said.

Please consider it retracted and my apologies to all who may have been offended. If I used emoticons and there was one indicating ‘I feel like a complete idiot’ then it would appear here.
 
My apologies! I’m so sorry, I put the wrong letter down. Of course I meant to say C, which was the whole point of making the list so it would reflect what he said.

Please consider it retracted and my apologies to all who may have been offended. If I used emoticons and there was one indicating ‘I feel like a complete idiot’ then it would appear here.
:tiphat:

A man of integrity.

And that’s why I love you so much! :kiss4you:
 
My guess the sin is the sin against the Holy Spirit, which Jesus said would not be forgiven neither in this world nor in the next.

And I’m betting that sin is the sin of unbelief … ATHEISM if we die railing against God… by far the dumbest move anybody could make.
To hate the very thought of God is irrational rather than evil! But it also depends on our motives and treatment of others. What counts is how we choose to live…
 
:tiphat:

A man of integrity.

And that’s why I love you so much! :kiss4you:
To apologise is to ask to be forgiven - which fulfils the prayer given to us by Jesus and a sign of not being on the way to hell! 😉
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top