How long ago was that?
So, you’re okay with a presumption of guilt? Is the IRS that incompetent?
Apologize? I’m doing no such thing. I’m just observing the dichotomy of justice regarding Trump and Democrat politicians (Clinton Foundation), as well as the comments of people like AG James.
November, 2019. Less than a year ago.
I do believe in a presumption of innocence. I just wonder why he’s fighting a subpoena so hard.
That’s not what “apologist” means.
Prosecution is not a tit for tat. It is done based on the crimes one commits, and what can actually be proven. I am deeply concerned with Americans today. To elect Trump, they shouted to lock up Hillary. Now to re-elect him, they his followers are chanting to lock up Biden. When did we start this sort of totalitarian mentality where political rivals are supposed to be sent to the gulag?
This was hilarious!
Is it over?
It’s nobody’s darn business. That’s why. BTW, how’s the investigation going into the NYT release of leaked copies of his taxes? Is AG James looking into that?
I’m not defending anything. He can defend himself.
Yep. That’s the double standard of the last four years. That’s the political and personal vendetta.
I’m a Lutheran. I quote the Apology of the Augsburg Confession all the time.
Yes it was hombre.
Is it presidential? Can you point the president out to children and tell them to emulate him?
I am posting that one to facebook.
To protect Trump?
I’m curious: What do you think you’re accomplishing here? Are you just trying to get a rise out of people, given that more folks here are Conservative than not?
The Mueller report was heavily redacted. The Stone trial showed collusion.
I’m not sure that’s a determination that makes a difference. I can’t think of a single politician that I can do that with. Certainly not Biden or Harris, or a single Democrat member of senate judiciary.
Actually, it wasn’t. It was only redacted where it had to be.JonNC:
The Mueller report was heavily redacted. The Stone trial showed collusion.
Not consistent. Nor do I believe you can establish a single crime he has committed. I am aware that some wish for one to satisfy their schadenfreude. But that’s unbecoming anyone claiming to be Catholic.
True. Or where it was turned over to the SDNY.
I think you would have to admit, however, that if Biden really is “The Big Guy” to whom 10% of a company related to the Chinese Communist Party was given, and if massive financial rewards to him and his company were in exchange for favors for China, he ought to be prosecuted. Same thing if Hunter was correct and he really did give half his “Burisma money” to Joe Biden and if it was the quid pro quo for the firing of the prosecutor, then Joe Biden should be prosecuted.
And I’m wondering why you feel the need to constantly tear Trump down on this forum. If he charged rent for the headspace he occupies in folks who think like yourself, he’d be a trillionaire.
No less so that Biden sniffing the hair of everyone he can get his mitts on.