L
LilyM
Guest
So the decision to start using vernacular in the liturgy, to give one example, was in no way based on what you call “secular” (and what I would call “practical” or even “pastoral”) factors, such as a decrease in the learning, use and understanding (and therefore relevance) of Latin among the community in general?No, more priests of the married variety will not help anything. You misunderstand the whole “liturgical reform.” Such things have a spiritual side that does not include secular ideas. This whole debate is sparked by secular thinking. The Church is not any institution. It was founded by Christ.
Communion on the Tongue was normative until an indult allowed Communion in the hand. Again, this is a spiritual decision. So, this “debate” had to be settled by spiritual, not secular means. A plan was put in place. I was there when the priest faced the people for the first time and spoke in the vernacular. This was the decision of Holy Mother Church and I obeyed. Secular thinking played no role.
And you think, in relation to disciplines, that the Church never considers secular/practical/pastoral factors? Not that it doesn’t or shouldn’t prioritise spiritual ones, but the two aren’t mutually exclusive.