D
Dan123
Guest
That’s fine but lets be clear, you were suspicious and a numbers guy but didn’t actually look into the numbers until I found them, in under 10 minutes.No, that was helpful, thank you! That’s exactly the kind of detail I’m talking about, that we should discuss. And yet in all the battleground states, the late results were surprisingly inconsistent with the early results. It wasn’t just that one county, although perhaps that one county was the most extreme example. I was expecting a democratic advantage from late votes, just not one to this extent. But I’d like to see a state by state comparison of late results against early results, and some more in depth analysis of it, not just talking points.
There are several factors at play in a lot of this, democrats utilized mail in voting to a much higher degree than republicans; republican leadership sued to prevent mail in voted from being counted early which means the in-person voting skewed republican. Some areas have more voters per location and in most places if you’re in line at closing they have to let you vote, which would delay being able to box up the ballots. Those tend to be more densely populated areas, which also tend to skew democratic.
The thing is this was always expected. 538 and election officials, journalists, and so on all knew the early ballots would skew Republican and the late ones would skew Democratic. This was fully expected, the reasons were well known, but that doesn’t seem to matter much for a lot of people. Understanding is secondary to being upset.
Is there another county you’d like for us to work out together? Ideally we’d find one where the numbers were out of line with previous elections by a significant margin without a good reason.