UK -Tommy Robinson Driven Into Exile by Arson Attack; Suspects BLM

  • Thread starter Thread starter gam197
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
Yes Gam, they have. Two men admitted to planting the bomb and were convicted. The second man was also convicted of driving to their meeting, with an SUV full of guns and ammunition and found guilty of intent to harm them. Those are not idle threats, those are real life events that resulted in real life convictions and jail time.

The church exists and is still active. You stating they are not relevant is purely your opinion. Besides, does the USA now only afford freedom of speech rights to ‘relevant’ groups, or to everyone? If it is the latter, than how ‘relevant’ you think the church is has no bearing on the argument.
That was a very long time ago. Let’s go back 15 years and look at the past, no. They are irrelevant and have been for a very long time.

Again Fred Phelps was already dead when the Supreme decided on buffer zones and tht was 6 years ago.
 
Last edited:
No because it is in the past. The buffer zone law was decided on in 2014 after Fred Phelps was already dead.
 
No because it is in the past. The buffer zone law was decided on in 2014 after Fred Phelps was already dead.
What relevance does Fred Phelps being dead have? The ruling enforcing the buffer zone was against the church, not Fred Phelps
 
What relevance does Fred Phelps being dead have? The ruling enforcing the buffer zone was against the church, not Fred Phelps
He was the head of the Westoboro Baptist church and his children have since turned against him You brought up this church but it has been irrelevant for a very long time. He was prominent a long time ago.

The church has not been active in a very long time so this ruling that you speak of has no relevance. The ruling that does have relevance is the buffer zone law that was unanimously passed by the Supreme Court of America stating that buffer zones are illegal. You canntot tell protesters where they can stand on a sidewalk.
 
Last edited:
Could be he no longer does drugs. People make money in many different ways. We are a capitalist country and have no problem with that.
 
Last edited:
Looks like more censorship from the UK
Great Britain’s Prince Harry, who along with his wife Meghan Markle has espoused left-wing causes, is calling for more censorship of social media and targeting corporations that fund social media.

“From conversations with experts in this space, we believe we have to remodel the architecture of our online community in a way defined more by compassion than hate; by truth instead of misinformation; by equity and inclusiveness instead of injustice and fearmongering; by free, rather than weaponized, speech,” he continued. “This remodeling must include industry leaders from all areas drawing a line in the sand against unacceptable online practices as well as being active participants in the process of establishing new standards for our online world.”

Harry likened the online atmosphere to the deadly effects of lead poisoning:

First speak about population control and now social media censorship, sounds about right.
 
Last edited:
He is praising Global Alliance For Responsible Media (GARM) . Back on topic.

Very uncharitable.

Not my creation but articles I saw in the news such as this last year and newer articles in April 2020.

 
Last edited:
I enjoy a nice curry meself once in a while and a glass of Stella Artois. I mean I know some people think Stella is a chav’s drink or for those with no taste regarding choosing a brew so possibly that might have been considered as uncharitable. We are talking about a figure here who routinely talks of people from Asian backgrounds as ‘Pakis’ and talks of beating them up. Often whilst coked up. I have little time for Tommy Robinson, he goes on about preserving British culture -what’s his idea of that culture? Beating people up at football matches, having barneys in the street at the drop of a hat because he thinks he’s tasty with his fists?
[/quote]

Not the food, how about wife beater and drug addict? You also said the idea of him coming to American was something I concocted myself which was untrue. He is not coming back to the UK if he can help it. His life was threatened I am sure many times. Utuber in UK threatened him. From Daily Mail…
A court heard how Basir, who lives with his parents, talked about ‘beating up and assaulting Mr Robinson’ before going on to describe how he would would ‘cut his neck off’ in one video titled ‘Tommy Robinson Abdul Basir 5’.
And more…
originally posted by JharekCarmelian
If you think Gam your immigration authorities are going to clear a man for entrance who has multiple criminal convictions including attacking police, drug usage and possession, fraud and travelling on illegal documents to your own nation then yes it could happen I suppose. Realistically I wouldn’t want to bet on it down Paddy Power tomorrow morning.
Again I did not make it up, I am just following the story.

 
Last edited:
Tommy Robinson has been ban from twitter and paypal allowing no fund rasing. My problem with cases like this is that social media has taken up the cause instead of allowing the courts to dictate.

The same in the Alex Jones case. He was barred from social media and funding sources.

We live in a society that has freedom of speech. We don’t get to decide what that speech is. If it is deemed harmful to other then the courts will get involved. Tommy Robbinson is one man who represents no one but Tommy Robinson…

Again you thought this was off topic but maybe it is right on topic. Prince Harry is seeking global iniatives to censor social media.

 
Last edited:
Yep and that also has consequences - PayPal and Twitter are private businesses and have decided they don’t wish Robinson’s business. The issues of freedom of speech don’t arise regarding that.
[/quote]

That does become another thread - Social media and censor of some people. We do have a court system and a system of justice to deal with that and it does work. We saw that is the deflamation of a US student by major news sources.
 
Last edited:
We are not back at the beginning of this thread again where only those who are citizens are allowed to comment instead of telling us how the UK deals with deflamation cases.

Post #149
 
Last edited:
I understand it is a deflamation case and he is facing up to 2 years in prison for that. People on social media say all kinds of nasty things and no one is going to jail.

He has already lost his rights to social media and his funding by cutting off Paypal.
 
Last edited:
I did read article, It does not tell much, He made a remark that the kid was possibly in a gang and that was untrue. He got a steep fine.
 
Please demonstrate where such rights are enshrined in law. You can do it with your own nation as you seem hesitant to deal with other legal codes.
[/quote]

I am asking what the legal codes are for deflamation cases. I have no idea of legal rights to social media or paypal in the UK or in the USA for that matter. No court cases have come up but I am sure they will.

Tommy Robinson has been cut off from social media and funding. Aside from that, the courts have to make a judgement on the law suit filed by the family for $125,000. or 100,000 pounds.

He is also facing up to 2 years in jail.
 
Because there are none, as you well know.
[/quote]

no lawsuits today
 
Last edited:
Also part of the UK culture for deflamation cases.

Again where is the video on what Tommy Robinson said - exact words on the Syrian boy.
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top