S
You’re trying to say that you never heard of the word Trinity before in your life? That by reading the bible you came up with it all by yourself? That without any outside assistance you actually understood that there were three Persons in one God from reading your bible? I somehow doubt that and believe on the contrary that the oral traditions and explanations of the word Trinity was already in your head before you ever picked up your Bible or while you were first studying it.Yes, are you saying that you can not? I can find in both the OT and the NT how the Trinity is implied. And I had a working understanding of the Trinity before I was ever “churched”.
You are correct Ric in that there is no condemnation for those in Christ Jesus. Amen. But condemnation would mean going to hell. Instead, try to think of purgatory as a cleansing fire that those of us in Christ may pass through before entering heaven. Nothing unclean may enter heaven.There is therefore now no condemnation for those who are in Christ Jesus. (Romans 8:1 ESV)
PurgatoryI am terrified of purgatory and the punishments it entails.
Hello!how are you churchmouse, just out of curiousity, are you a catholic. The reason I ask is that you say that 2 Macc 12 doesn’t prove a third state after death (although prayer for the dead clearly indicates one) implying that you accept this book as canonical. I’m glad you are honest enough to point that there at least has to be a third state in theory. There are many things that aren’t concrete in the bible, which all christians are obliged to believe. Although there are implicit passages in scripture supporting purgatory, there are christian writings from the beginning and throughout the early centuries which explicitly show the doctrine to be true. I’m going to flip the question and ask you to show me anywhere in scripture or the early christian writings that explicitly show it can not be true.
Hi Thomas,ric,
To reverse matters on you:
Please, no “well, purgatory isn’t explicitly mentioned either” arguments. Purgatory is a logical extension of Scripture, the Trinity is not and cannot be compared to it.
There is no more support for the Trinity in Scripture then there is for purgatory.
Thomas,Churchmouse,
You do not want to discuss the Canon of Scripture, yet when it comes to the topic of purgatory that is an essential element. If 2 Maccabees belongs to inspired Canon, as the Church has always taught and the early Church accepted, then its writings are equal to every other writing in the Bible. Therefore, one cannot just throw-out the importance of praying to the dead just because they do not want to acknowledge the proper Canon.
Praying for the dead doesn’t mean that they were praying for their release from a purgatory. The early church would pray for the refreshment of their deceased (refrigerium). They prayed for more “heavenly happiness.” Although nothing could be happier than being in heaven, this didn’t stop the early church from praying that this “happiness” would be intensified upon the deceased. Personally, I believe it did more for those who prayed than for those they prayed for. It probably brought them solace. So, no, praying for the dead doesn’t automatically imply a purgatory.As I stated in an earlier post: Praying for the souls in hell does no good at all; likewise praying for the souls in Heaven is without meaning because they are already in Heaven. Since the Bible contains nothing that is meaningless, the prayers for the dead found in 2 Maccabees has to carry meaning…and since we know those prayers are useless for souls in hell and Heaven, then there MUST be a third place or state (purification, purgatory).
I understand, but there is a difference between purification and afterlife purification. I agree, there are verses that speak of the need for purification, but to apply this purification in the afterlife is definitely not found in the Bible. Catholics have to rely on implicity to make an argument for it.Churchmouse,
I agree, prayers for the dead does not automatically prove or disprove the existence of purgatory. I think you missed my point. There are many Scripture verses that speak to the need for purification, the 2 Maccabees does not speak to that.
But I would contend that this “holy and pious thought” can easily be interpreted as the belief that the dead can be prayed out of the hell of the damned. After all, the context would demand it. Judas’ prayed that idolatrous men–those who committed a mortal sin– would be “loosed from their sins” on the day of resurrection. This doesn’t imply a third state considering that Judas is trying to pray them out of hell.I am merely pointing out that in 2 Maccabees prayer for the dead is used as a very good action, not a sinful action. Since we know that prayer for the souls in hell and Heaven would be fairly meaningless, then it is an easy extrapolation to ask “where are the souls that those prayers are intended for?”
In context, no it doesn’t.The 2 Maccabees implies that there must be a third place or state.
Thank you thomasj317. This was the point I was trying to make in my last post.To all,
Here, in my opinion, is a very important point. If purgatory exists as the Church teaches (and I certainly believe that the Church is correct), and if prayers can help those souls in purgatory as the Church teaches (and I certainly believe that the Church is correct), then we should “want” to pray for those souls so that their time in purgatory might be shortened.
Well, like I stated in my first post on this thread, I have pretty much heard every verse used to support purgatory. This one isn’t any different considering it says absolutely nothing about purgatory. Neither does it imply afterlife purification considering that holiness can be attained in this life. I really don’t know how you can see the words “nothing unclean” and rationalize that it “definitely applies to the afterlife.” Again, you would have to inflict your interpretation into the verse to make it sound purgatorial.Churchmouse,
Nothing unclean can enter Heaven is quite a powerful concept. It does not say “no-one with sin,” it says “nothing unclean” and that most definitely applies to afterlife.
Well, that would be a contradiction. Again, in light of Catholic teaching, these men died with idols in their possession. They died with mortal sin, thus, they would be considered “spiritually dead” as you have stated. Judas’ prayed for these “spiritually dead” men, thus, Judas committed an action which was forbidden by God, but this “canonical” book calls it a “holy and pious thought” Again, this is using your argumentation and it just doesn’t jibe.In 2 Maccabees it was Jews who were praying for the dead and they absolutely knew that praying for the spiritually dead was directly forbidden by God–they would not and could not have messed that up and I am utterly convinced that the Holy Spirit would not allow such an error to make it into the Canon of Scripture.