M
He definitely does exactly that very thing. Trump did not get where he is today by being stupid. People underestimate him. He uses that to his advantage.Something to consider with Trump: I seriously think he makes inflammatory statements to distract the media, while he does substantial work and they don’t notice (much):
I don’t think it’s really so black and white though, and more than just supporting or not supporting abortion needs to be taken into consideration. The pro-choice agenda has already been won, and unfortunately is the law of the land. In general, republicans are against abortion in principle and against the legality of it. Which is great, but the Supreme Court made its decision, and while it’s possible to over turn Roe V. Wade, how realistic is it?.. I don’t know the answer to that. Very strong arguments can be made that even though Democrats support the legality of abortion, many other issues they support, such as certain government assistance programs and healthcare would do more to fight the actual reasons most abortions occur, and lower the abortion rate that way. So, voting along lines such as that, is not a “pro-choice” vote, and could justifiably be a proportionate reason to vote for a Democrat. The USCCB outlines where we should stand on issues, but it leaves open the possibility of voting for any party based on one’s own judgement. I’m not going to encourage voting in either direction, because that’s for your own moral judgement. I just want to highlight that INTENT MATTERS, there are justifiable reasons to vote for either side from a pro-life perspective.Slippery slope and not much leeway, unfortunately. Personally, I don’t like how I voted. I’m saddened that I might have helped the pro choice agenda. Even though I simply was against Trump for a lot of his own agenda. As for my party affiliation; I’m registered non partisan. Though I generally like Republicans more than the Dems.
Actually, he does give examples of what are NOT proportionate reasons; war and the death penalty. “Proportionate” is easy to understand. When one is talking about an “intrinsic evil” (evil in every case) there’s no “prudential judgment” to it. As to all other current political issues, one may exercise prudential judgment. Proportionate reasons such as killing all Jews or all people over age 55 are obvious, but they’re not part of the current political agenda of any party.Nowhere does the Cardinal Ratzinger spell out what “proportionate reasons” are. This means that the Church leaves it to the individual’s own prudential judgment. This statement nowhere says “vote Trump and the GOP or the baby gets it!”
John put it clearly.It just hit me. I voted Democrat last Congressional elections. My vote wasn’t pro choice; it was an vote against Trump. What just hit me is that voting Democrat May be a mortal sin because the Dems are notoriously pro abort. Even though my vote was an anti Trump vote; could my vote be a mortal sin?
I agree.I’m so upset about what happened to the democratic party. It used to be different. Democrats used to care about the sick, the weak and the helpless.
USCCB on abortionRidgerunner:![]()
That is not what then Cardinal Ratzinger said in his letter, which was a footnote in a longer letter to the USCCB:As we know, Pope Benedict said one cannot vote for one who supports abortion unless for a proportionally grave reason.
Nowhere does the Cardinal Ratzinger spell out what “proportionate reasons” are. This means that the Church leaves it to the individual’s own prudential judgment. This statement nowhere says “vote Trump and the GOP or the baby gets it!”A Catholic would be guilty of formal cooperation in evil, and so unworthy to present himself for Holy Communion, if he were to deliberately vote for a candidate precisely because of the candidate’s permissive stand on abortion and/or euthanasia. When a Catholic does not share a candidate’s stand in favour of abortion and/or euthanasia, but votes for that candidate for other reasons , it is considered remote material cooperation, which can be permitted in the presence of proportionate reasons.