A
Anrakyr
Guest
Because walls don’t stop planes and other legal methods to enter.Honestly I don’t know how you can oppose drug or human trafficking and not support a border wall.
Because walls don’t stop planes and other legal methods to enter.Honestly I don’t know how you can oppose drug or human trafficking and not support a border wall.
No one supports abuse of any kind. Why do you think they do? We as the United States have a right and a duty to protect our borders from invasion of illegal aliens. If fault is found with the people engaged in that defense of our country they should be fired and prosecuted. That certainly does not mean we should not protect our borders.It’s utterly disgusting that there are some people who claim to be Christians, even sitting in the pews on Sunday, who have an I don’t care attitude towards human beings based on their legal status in the U.S. And some who even Dare to Defend the mal-treatment of their fellow human beings. Completely Outrageous.
You think enormous quantities of drug and human trafficking occurs over commercial airlines flying internationally into the United States? You realize there are drug dogs and paperwork requirements for flying into the United States from abroad, right? Are you saying we need to further tighten airport security?Because walls don’t stop planes and other legal methods to enter.
A wall would stop some from entering.Because walls don’t stop planes and other legal methods to enter.
So are you saying we should also tare down border crossing points? Or do you believe there is no illegal crossing of the Southern U.S. border and so a wall is pointless?Walls have upkeep too.
I agree. I don’t like when the pope makes meaningless sound bites like 'build bridges not walls." What does that mean? It’s not a statement of support for President Trump’s efforts to secure our border. I assume the pope is speaking figuratively, but bridges physically connect people. Does that mean he wants unlimited illegal aliens here?Near as I can tell Pope Francis and the USCCB are open border advocates and believe in amnesty for all and unlimited immigration
I don’t think anyone is trying to stop legal methods. Did you mean Illegal?Because walls don’t stop planes and other legal methods to enter.
I believe the cost of the wall outweighs its benefits.So are you saying we should also tare down border crossing points? Or do you believe there is no illegal crossing of the Southern U.S. border and so a wall is pointless?
NoI don’t think anyone is trying to stop legal methods. Did you mean Illegal?
Or a ladder.There certainly are border agents who do try to stop illegal aliens using planes. The majority of illegal aliens do come over by cutting or climbing fences. Tall, strong, strategically placed walls would certainly work well.
The cost of the wall is chump-change to the U.S government.I believe the cost of the wall outweighs its benefits.
The Wall will cost 20 billion dollars just to build. whats not even covering the cost to maintain it.The cost of the wall is chump-change to the U.S government.
Not really but should you choose to do so the way it’s being done is incorrect.Do you believe we should have legal points of entry that are guarded and conduct security checks on people entering the United States?
Free movement is good. Restricting it? Well depends on how and why. For the reasons they use today? No.Is there something wrong with that?
Control. Security Theatre. Politics.I ask you again: what is the point of having crossing points or legal ports of entry into the United States if it is perfectly moral and legitimate just to bypass them completely?
Like I said, chump-change. Obamacare had over a trillion dollars marked for it over 10 years and you think spending 20 billion to secure the Southern border is something to fret about? That’s a laughable sum of money for U.S federal spending. Please stop pretending this is about money. I’m glad my line of questioning has made you declare your true beliefs. Now I ask you: does Mexico have the right to have border security and control checkpoints on its borders or may any American for any reason and at any time enter Mexico or any other country for whatever reason they please unhindered?The Wall will cost 20 billion dollars just to build
Like I said most of the money in the budget is already spoken for.Like I said, chump-change. Obamacare had over a trillion dollars marked for it over 10 years and you think spending 20 billion to secure the Southern border is something to fret about?
I’m leaning on the money point because arguing with nationalist to be less xenophobic for any other reason than cost is pointless. Not that I’m accusing anyone here but I’d rather avoid that topic altogether. It leads nowhere.Please stop pretending this is about money.
I’m glad my line of questioning has made you declare your true beliefs.
It should work both ways yes.Now I ask you: does Mexico have the right to have border security and control checkpoints on its borders or may any American for any reason and at any time enter Mexico or any other country for whatever reason they please unhindered?
Okay, so you are saying we should not invest in border crossing points or airport security because this is not an investment in people? Do you believe Russian agents and assets should be allowed free and unlimited access to the United States? Neo-Nazis? Islamic Jihadists? Members of the Taliban?healthcare is an investment in people.
For the third time, not the way they are doing it, no.Okay, so you are saying we should not invest in border crossing points or airport security because this is not an investment in people?
Considering they are people and you can’t tell the difference? Yes.Do you believe Russian agents and assets should be allowed free and unlimited access to the United States? Neo-Nazis? Islamic Jihadists? Members of the Taliban?
I’m also for putting more pressure on their home Govt and Bishops to better shoulder their responsibility of caring for their citizens/flock. We can help them but we should not supplant them in their duty.Personally I’d rather help Americans than illegals, and I don’t think I’m a sinner for thinking that.
OKay, I appreciate your candour, but to be fair we often can tell the difference. Security is more than capable at times of identifying foreign agents, people who belong to Jihadist groups, etc. Or do you think security protocols have never prevented or deterred e.g. criminal elements from crossing borders by trying to fly or drive over borders? My only point Anrakyr is that at some point you are not going to want certain people freely moving into your country, especially if those people have an intention and desire to harm you or your loved ones, for example. Reasonable border security is not impossibly expensive - 20 billion to secure the Southern border is a bargain.Considering they are people and you can’t tell the difference? Yes.
Assuming it works better then what you have which it doesn’t.20 billion to secure the Southern border is a bargain.
Wishing you the best of Luck!He has a new job near the border. I’m getting curious about what kinds of problems we will run into when we get there.
I live in a Southern border State. All of the major drug busts are made at legal points of entry which are exclusively what the Cartels use to bring their drugs into the USA. What is needed is more security & tools at these legal points of entry to stop more of the drug flow, since they’re catching but a fraction of what comes through these legal check points. Money wasted on a Wall, prevents money to be sent to fix the actual problem when it comes to drugs.Honestly I don’t know how you can oppose drug or human trafficking and not support a border wall.