The question I asked had to do with your understanding of what inspired Scripture means. You didn’t answer that.
I think inspired Scripture “relies” on a Messenger of God. So Paul’s inspiration relies on Jesus. Without Jesus, there is no inspiration for Paul. Paul is not the actual “inspiration” itself. As a result, He provides certain Truths which are reliant on the condition of His spiritual inspiration from Jesus. He is not privy to “absolute” Truth, and if he infers that Jesus is greater than Moses, we need to understand in which context he is referring to.
If Paul is trying to say that Moses was not privy to the teachings of Jesus, then I think Paul is wrong, simply because Paul cannot know who Moses truly was, nor what He was privy to. Only God does.
If Paul was trying to infer that the light of the Teachings of Jesus was more potent than the light of the Teachings of Moses, then we can assess that from an objective standpoint ourselves and come to an objective conclusion.
Inspiration does not mean “infallible” by any sense of the word. Paul can right all he likes about who he thinks Moses was and some things he would write may be correct, yet some things are incorrect.
It is important to differentiate inspiration from imagination. Intention may well be pure from Paul’s standpoint, and as he writes he has Jesus’ interests as a foremost priority in his mind and heart, yet, like all humans, there are times when the absolute Truth is not contained within that inspiration, since vain imagination can so easily interfere.
How would you differentiate bewteen inspiration and vain imagination?
The thread topic, of which you are the OP, has to do with Moses and Jesus. Instead, as I suspected, you immediately make this about Baha’u’llah and the Baha’i faith. Like I said, this is nothing more than Baha’i thread number VI in sheep’s clothing. You aren’t here to discuss what Jesus brought to the world that Moses did not. You are here to promote your religion.
This is unfair Steve. I have tried to be extremely strict in regards to talking about my Faith in this thread. Yes, the thread was inspired by Eddies’ persitence in asking “What has Baha’u’llah brought to the world that is new?” yet I made a conscious decision to stick to comaparing Judaism with Christianity in this thread.
If you go back, I have asked Eddie on more than one occasion to address his Baha’u’llah accusations on another thread. Yet, again, you see on the previous page how he is insisting to do so on this thread. Eventually, one has to bow to pressure and respond.
I hope you see with the eyes of justice