What did Jesus bring to the world that was not already brought by Moses?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Servant19
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
The Law (Torah) is not intended to condemn man; it is intended to teach man how to live in freedom according to moral values and G-d’s will. IOW, the Law should not be followed as if it were a burden, but rather in joy and delight for it is mankind’s “salvation.” And if one strays from the Law in some respect, as we all do, G-d is always merciful and ready to forgive us if we only repent of our wrongdoing and try to do better the next time.
The law does condemn men, it shows how inadequate we are before the great and all powerful God. Of course my theology on this regard is from Paul and the apostles not judaism. Jesus Christ is where grace and truth come from.
 
Just wondering what it was that Jesus brought to humanity that was not already brought by Moses Himself?

What is the Catholic (and non-Catholic if anyone wishes to contribute) position on this?

Thanks and G-d bless!
Even if you don’t buy the belief that Jesus redeemed all human beings and brought salvation to humanity (I don’t believe in original sin or that there was no salvation before Jesus), you have to accept that Jesus brought a totally new message to humanity - that of unconditional love for everyone including your enemies.

No person before Jesus has suggested that you need to forgive and even ‘love your enemies’. This is a totally radical and new message.

The Old Testament on the other hand mainly contains stories of killing your enemies (including maybe women, children, babies etc).
 
The law does condemn men, it shows how inadequate we are before the great and all powerful God. Of course my theology on this regard is from Paul and the apostles not judaism. Jesus Christ is where grace and truth come from.
Surely Christianity cannot believe that the Law was intentionally given to the Jews by G-d so that G-d could show the Jews how “inadequate (they) are before the great and all powerful G-d.” If Paul truly believed this–and although he does describe the Law as a burden, I am not sure there were not some qualifications in his own mind–he must have been mistaken, for what kind of a god would do such a thing? It sounds more like the Wizard of Oz. No, in Deuteronomy, Moses explicitly states that the Law is not so far removed that one cannot follow it provided one make the attempt, and the Psalms speak of the Law as “sweet like honey.” Further, as I previously noted, G-d understands that mankind is not perfect and will fall short; the important thing, however, is to pick oneself up and try again. This too is clearly stated in the Hebrew Bible.
 
Surely Christianity cannot believe that the Law was intentionally given to the Jews by G-d so that G-d could show the Jews how “inadequate (they) are before the great and all powerful G-d.” If Paul truly believed this–and although he does describe the Law as a burden, I am not sure there were not some qualifications in his own mind–he must have been mistaken, for what kind of a god would do such a thing? It sounds more like the Wizard of Oz. No, in Deuteronomy, Moses explicitly states that the Law is not so far removed that one cannot follow it provided one make the attempt, and the Psalms speak of the Law as “sweet like honey.” Further, as I previously noted, G-d understands that mankind is not perfect and will fall short; the important thing, however, is to pick oneself up and try again. This too is clearly stated in the Hebrew Bible.
Meltzerboy, you’ve picked up very well on what some Christians identify as the three uses of the Law:
  • The Law is a curb, to prevent sin.
  • The Law is a mirror, to show how inadequate we are before God.
  • The Law is a guide, to follow when we fall and are picked up to try again (as you stated).
 
Surely Christianity cannot believe that the Law was intentionally given to the Jews by G-d so that G-d could show the Jews how “inadequate (they) are before the great and all powerful G-d.” If Paul truly believed this–and although he does describe the Law as a burden, I am not sure there were not some qualifications in his own mind–he must have been mistaken, for what kind of a god would do such a thing? It sounds more like the Wizard of Oz. No, in Deuteronomy, Moses explicitly states that the Law is not so far removed that one cannot follow it provided one make the attempt, and the Psalms speak of the Law as “sweet like honey.” Further, as I previously noted, G-d understands that mankind is not perfect and will fall short; the important thing, however, is to pick oneself up and try again. This too is clearly stated in the Hebrew Bible.
I would be out of my league if I were to even attempt to say I understand paul or the entire bible clearly. What I can say is I do not believe the fulness of grace resides in the law, that resides only in Jesus the risen Christ. The law can only get you so far and certaintly you cannot abide by the law(no jew or gentile can).
 
Surely Christianity cannot believe that the Law was intentionally given to the Jews by G-d so that G-d could show the Jews how “inadequate (they) are before the great and all powerful G-d.” If Paul truly believed this–and although he does describe the Law as a burden, I am not sure there were not some qualifications in his own mind–he must have been mistaken, for what kind of a god would do such a thing? It sounds more like the Wizard of Oz.
Christians typically think of the Jewish people of the OT as part of our own family. When we think about their relationship with God, We can typically relate to that experience as if it was us that it happened to… As if we are the same as the Jews.

…so anything good or bad that the Jews experienced makes us feel either good or bad -because we consider ourselves the same.

But no, I don’t believe God was ‘testing’ the Jews with their salvation at stake. God wants us in heaven.
 
Could you show a source that indicates that Jesus actually foretold the coming of Mohammed as the final prophet?
In the Qur’an, surah 61:6 - “And remember, Jesus, the son of Mary, said: “O Children of Israel! I am the messenger of Allah (sent) to you, confirming the Law (which came) before me, and giving Glad Tidings of a Messenger to come after me, whose name shall be Ahmad.” But when he came to them with Clear Signs, they said, "this is evident sorcery!
 
In the Qur’an, surah 61:6 - “And remember, Jesus, the son of Mary, said: “O Children of Israel! I am the messenger of Allah (sent) to you, confirming the Law (which came) before me, and giving Glad Tidings of a Messenger to come after me, whose name shall be Ahmad.” But when he came to them with Clear Signs, they said, "this is evident sorcery!
Theres no reason to believe Jesus said that.
 
Hi, I said we fail. By we I mean everyone. :). By failure, I mean sin. Sin separates us from God. The Christian understanding of God, is that He his merciful AND just.

Our sins require justice, but God is merciful, and so we understand sin puts us in need of God’s mercy, which has been given through the ages. Moses being an important indicator of God’s mercy, in the form of God’s action towards the people of God. We call these historical events, of God acting in the world, “salvation history”.

As someone says, these events prefigure Christ, who is God’s mercy and justice, on our behalf. Once, for all.
Thankyou Rebecca, I think I understand your reasoning. However, how are Christians made righteous through Christ?

Would you also not say that our sins still require justice? If Jesus provided mercy and justice on our behalf, what reasoning is there to do good? Is it not about faith and works?

I think the justice for not abiding by the law and dishonouring God in our works had its own justice within Judaism and still does today post-Christ, no?
 
No person before Jesus has suggested that you need to forgive and even ‘love your enemies’. This is a totally radical and new message.
In actuality the concept of loving one’s enemies predates Jesus.

A thorough study of the Buddha’s Dhammapada will reveal the following verses attributed to the Buddha Himself:

Shame on him who strikes, greater shame on him who strikes back. Let us live happily, not hating those who hate us. Let us therefore overcome anger by kindness, evil by good, falsehood by truth. Do not hurt others in ways that would be hurtful to yourself.


“Hatreds do not cease in this world by hating, but by love, overcoming evil by good. Overcome the miser by giving, overcome the liar by truth.”

 
Apparently a large group of Jews (the first Christians) disagree with you. The conclusion I gather from their actions is the Jews didn’t believe in original sin because they were not aware of it at the time. This must mean Christ revealed its existence to them and the need for a rebirth (baptism). Now if the Jews didn’t believe in original sin simply because they were not aware of its existence then I hardly see how their unbelief in something they didn’t know existed is evidence against the necessity for Jesus.
Good post,👍
The conclusion I gather from their actions is the Jews didn’t believe in original sin because they were not aware of it at the time.
this is what i was aware of.when Jesus makes the blind see.
 
Thankyou doormouse for bringing this post to my attention 🙂
Apparently a large group of Jews (the first Christians) disagree with you. The conclusion I gather from their actions is the Jews didn’t believe in original sin because they were not aware of it at the time. This must mean Christ revealed its existence to them and the need for a rebirth (baptism). Now if the Jews didn’t believe in original sin simply because they were not aware of its existence then I hardly see how their unbelief in something they didn’t know existed is evidence against the necessity for Jesus.
I see… so a Man of God can enter the earthly arena and completely abolish the understanding and meaning that a previous Dispensation has developed over centuries of one of its own Holy Books?

The understanding of Judaism of the Book of Genesis was incorrect? Jesus had the authority to interpret the Book of Genesis for the Jews?
 
Thankyou doormouse for bringing this post to my attention 🙂

I see… so a Man of God can enter the earthly arena and completely abolish the understanding and meaning that a previous Dispensation has developed over centuries of one of its own Holy Books?

The understanding of Judaism of the Book of Genesis was incorrect? Jesus had the authority to interpret the Book of Genesis for the Jews?
if you look at Meltzers posts (dont remember winch ones at hand, but few link.)
and then read this along with what came to the world next…
I see… so a Man of God can enter the earthly arena and completely abolish the understanding and meaning that a previous Dispensation has developed over centuries of one of its own Holy Books?
they did not understand what sin was,even though they were doing them. you have been shown this by reading the post of people in the thread.
 
Thankyou doormouse for bringing this post to my attention 🙂

I see… so a Man of God can enter the earthly arena and completely abolish the understanding and meaning that a previous Dispensation has developed over centuries of one of its own Holy Books?
Someone is forgetting their Christianity. Christ didn’t abolish the law, He perfected it.
The understanding of Judaism of the Book of Genesis was incorrect? Jesus had the authority to interpret the Book of Genesis for the Jews?
No. The Jews understanding was not complete, there is a difference. Also Jesus is God Man so yes, He has the authority to interpret His own words.
 
Someone is forgetting their Christianity. Christ didn’t abolish the law, He perfected it.
Hello Hypno,

I didn’y say that Jesus abolished the Law (although according to Paul, the Law of Moses was deemed the “ministry that brought death”), what I did say is that Jesus abolished the meaning of the Book of Genesis.
No. The Jews understanding was not complete, there is a difference. Also Jesus is God Man so yes, He has the authority to interpret His own words.
If, as you say (and several others) the Jews were victims of “origibal sin” yet were unaware of it, then it also means that the entire Jewish Faith was wrong in its understanding of the Tanakh.

So, you think this is what Jesus brought? A re-configuration of the meaning of the Tanakh which contradicted the meanings passed down for centuries?

And your justification for this is that He is God Man? How do you know that this “God Man” indoctrination is not similarly flawed as was the “original sin” error of the Jews?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top