S
Servant19
Guest
Ok, we could talk about this all day, but the point is that Catholicism considers the Garden of Eden as a literal place where Adam ate an apple yes?Why can’t an account be literal, symbolic and metaphorical?
Ok, we could talk about this all day, but the point is that Catholicism considers the Garden of Eden as a literal place where Adam ate an apple yes?Why can’t an account be literal, symbolic and metaphorical?
Nope. There is no apple. You can search all of Genesis and no apple is ever mentioned.Ok, we could talk about this all day, but the point is that Catholicism considers the Garden of Eden as a literal place where Adam ate an apple yes?
Nope.But when the wrong fruit was eaten, they became sinners.
Ok, I’m fine with that.Nope. There is no apple. You can search all of Genesis and no apple is ever mentioned.
That is an invention of men.
Have a good long think about what that means PR…Nope.
It is not because they ate the wrong food that they became sinners. It is when they attempted to usurp what belongs to God alone–that of deciding what is good and evil.
It is literally, figuratively, symbolically and metaphorically true, yes.Ok, I’m fine with that.
So the rest of the narrative is literally true?
I have, Servant. I have.Have a good long think about what that means PR…
I don’t need to move outside the Catholic box, for the Catholic box encompasses all truth.Move outside the Catholic box and think sister…think
Just curious–why did you think there was an apple in the story of the Garden of Eden?Ok, I’m fine with that.
So the rest of the narrative is literally true?
Good pointJust curious–why did you think there was an apple in the story of the Garden of Eden?
Have you not actually read Genesis, but only read things people have said about it?
Hi GaussIf living beings did not need food, air, and water to continue to live, then the world might be perfect. As it is, the world provides only limited supplies of food, air, and water to living beings, so it is imperfect. And if we look at where animal food comes from, it is derived from other living beings. In other words, eating and being eaten are part of the equation. Can this be perfection?
The world has good things and bad things. Gentle rain is mostly good, but violent storms can be destructive. Warmth is good, but severe cold is not. Volcanoes can be destructive. All these elements have no effect on spirits, but living beings are affected. Is this perfection or is it even approaching perfection?
If we considered the world as a location of spiritual beings who do not need food, air , and water, then the world might be considered perfect. And if we look at where animal food comes from, it is derived from other living beings.
I really wish you wouldn’t read it. Unless you are going to read it through the lens of the faith which gave you this bible.Good point
Its actually been a long time since I read Genesis. I have read it cover to cover, but I guess man made stuff creeps into our psyche after a while…
I think its time to re-read it
So how do we recognize complete perfection when we see it?Hi Gauss
Do you not accustom your children to hardships? Get them to struggle with washing, cooking, cleaning etc?
The collective body of mankind going through physical torment and tests is not an indicator of “imperfection”?
Sometimes hardship is a necessity for the acquisition of ever higher standards of perfection…
Is the compiler of the book of poetry the sole authority on the meaning of each poem?I really wish you wouldn’t read it. Unless you are going to read it through the lens of the faith which gave you this bible.
As finite beings we cannot fathom true perfection, because there is no limit to perfection. It is a limitless concept.So how do we recognize complete perfection when we see it?
It is only because of this compiler that you know this comes from God.Is the compiler of the book of poetry the sole authority on the meaning of each poem?
…the poetry existed before the compiler
Which means we have to have A LOT OF FAITH in the compiler…It is only because of this compiler that you know this comes from God.
Egg-zactly.Which means we have to have A LOT OF FAITH in the compiler…
How would you know whether something was explicitly written by Jesus?…at teh same time, it does not give the compiler any authority to interpret, unless specifically andf explicitly written by Jesus Himself.
…when it comes to the Word of God, I would prefer to be certain that the Person I am worshipping has definitely said what it is that is forming my identity and being as a human…Egg-zactly.
How would you know whether something was explicitly written by Jesus?
Unless…
You trust in the authority of this compiler, right?
I think there are some here and there, I can’t recall, but I can look it up if you’re interestedIncidentally, are there any words of Jesus that your prophets have attributes to Jesus that are not from the bible? Just curious about that.
Egg-zactly.…when it comes to the Word of God, I would prefer to be certain that the Person I am worshipping has definitely said what it is that is forming my identity and being as a human…
Right. You are submitting to the authority of the Catholic Church each time you quote from the New Testament as the word of God.I have faith in the compilers of the bible.
Yes. I’d like that very much.I think there are some here and there, I can’t recall, but I can look it up if you’re interested
There is a Story that Abdul’Baha told about Christ which is GoodIncidentally, are there any words of Jesus that your prophets have attributes to Jesus that are not from the bible? Just curious about that.