What is antisemitism?

  • Thread starter Thread starter OneSheep
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
Would a criticism of B.N.'s statement be antisemitic?
It could, but it doesn’t have to be. My main point was that people are quick to jump on any excuse to label Israel as undemocratic or a rogue state, but they never complain about far worse actions from other governments/societies. I just think often Israel is held to a higher standard and is faulted for not meeting that standard–and part of me thinks some of this stems from anti-Semitic attitudes.
 
Last edited:
He apparently meant some other guy on the list was a big player in the Holodomor, so nope, I misunderstood him.

Basically. :roll_eyes:
 
It could , but it doesn’t have to be.
Exactly. Same as the comments of Ilhan Omar. We are called to give people the benefit of the doubt, to not assume a negative because that is judgmental.

“Antisemitism” is more than just a description of a prejudice, it is a judgment in itself, correct? Society is prejudiced against antisemites, which is very understandable, but a reaction to a reaction goes nowhere in the long run. To me, it is fruitful to meet antisemites with understanding and forgiveness.

It is also fruitful to point out that judgment of Jewish people is not forgiveness, and it is not merciful. All people have good intentions.
 
God loves us unconditionally, but may send us to hell; it is a common image. Where this image is in conflict to people is that we can rely on the statement “God loves us at least as much as the person who loves us most”. My parents would not send me to hell, they would forgive me unconditionally, so the image of God condemning people does not make sense (to me).
“Sometimes it may seem as though God does not respond to evil, that he is silent. In reality, God has spoken, he has replied and his answer is the cross of Christ: a word that is love, mercy and forgiveness. It is also judgment: God judges us by loving us. If I embrace his love then I am saved; if I refuse it, then I am condemned, not by him, but by myself, because God does not condemn, he only loves and saves.” - Pope Francis
I guess the question to ask here is "How does God feel toward Jewish people as a whole, does He find them lacking in some way? The Catholic believer’s answer to this is likely going to effect his or her own feelings toward Jewish people. It may seem a bit innocuous, but if in the future a Jewish person wrongs someone in some way, the image may lead to the rationale for some sort of negative action or condemnation toward a Jewish person or toward Jews in general.

So sure, evangelization is important, but the evangelist reflects truth when he or she begins with a nonjudgmental stance, reflecting a merciful, loving, forgiving Father whose arms, like those of the prodigal son’s father, are always wide open.
 
To me, it is fruitful to meet antisemites with understanding and forgiveness.
Yes, initially. But when you have repeatedly been told that, as in Ilhan Omar’s case, you are engaging in anti-Semitism or at least what looks like anti-Semitism and she apologizes but then says more things that sound anti-Semitc then it becomes clear that you are not dealing with someone who cares about gaining understanding or forgiveness. You are dealing with someone who actually believes what she’s saying and is therefore not a person who you can dialogue with in good faith.
All people have good intentions.
No, they don’t. And if you believe that, then you don’t understand human nature.
 
Last edited:
Yes, initially. But when you have repeatedly been told that, as in Ilhan Omar’s case, you are engaging in anti-Semitism or at least what looks like anti-Semitism and she apologizes but then says more things that sound anti-Semitc then it becomes clear that you are not dealing with someone who cares about gaining understanding or forgiveness. You are dealing with someone who actually believes what she’s saying and is therefore not a person who you can dialogue with in good faith.
Hmmm. But when you are saying “sounds antisemitic” are you giving her the benefit of the doubt? Did you know that Jewish people got on her case about some of the apologies? They said she was telling the truth about AIPAC, and not to stand down or make it sound like AIPAC was not the big influence that it is. My understanding is that most American Jews do not support AIPAC’s policies.

Perhaps you could read this first, and then go back to her other statements, the ones that “sound antisemitic” and see them with a more charitable light?
No, they don’t. And if you believe that, then you don’t understand human nature.
Even Hitler meant well. He perceived an evil, and sought to destroy what he saw as a threat. He was blinded by hate and prejudice, but he meant well. He thought he was doing something good.

Now in telling me I don’t understand human nature, you mean well. You want to correct something you see as wrong or even hurtful, right?

Can you find a single statement made in this thread that was done without good intent?
 
Did I deny hell? Are you perhaps saying that you see God differently than Pope Francis? It’s okay, we all have slightly different images. They are formed through experience.

Our parents are our first catechists, and it is possible that yours presented a different image than mine. Nothing “wrong” either way.

When we live in sin, we are already living a hell before the one we could choose in the afterlife. If you doubt this, ask a recovering alcoholic.
 
It seems to me that antisemitism is another term that has been skewed due to extreme political types seeking to guilt or shame someone into silence. If you didn’t like Obama’s policies, you’re a racist. If you like trump you support mysogyny. If you want single payer healthcare, you’re a socialist. If you support strong immigration laws, you’re a racist and a nazi.
People now habitually take these terms and distort their meanings for their own political purposes.
I prefer to be charitable and engage in civil conversation and debate. When someone instantly starts throwing these labels around, I move on.
 
Last edited:
Are you saying the Hitler perceived an evil? Or that he perceived what he thought was an evil?

The latter is possible, but I am unconvinced. The former is absolutely wrong.
 
Last edited:
Hmmm. But when you are saying “sounds antisemitic” are you giving her the benefit of the doubt?
You get the benefit of the doubt when you make a mistake or act in ignorance or express yourself inarticulately one time. You don’t get the benefit of the doubt when you keep stepping into the same controversy over and over again. Ilhan Omar has been made aware numerous times that the way she talks about Israel and the pro-Israeli support in the US sounds anti-Semitic and makes use of anti-Semitic references. Multiple times is not a mistake, and it’s not ignorance. It’s probably just who she is.
Did you know that Jewish people got on her case about some of the apologies? They said she was telling the truth about AIPAC, and not to stand down or make it sound like AIPAC was not the big influence that it is. My understanding is that most American Jews do not support AIPAC’s policies.
OK. What does that have to do with Ilhan Omar being or not being anti-Semitic. You can criticize AIPAC without using anti-Semitic slurs.
Even Hitler meant well.
No, he didn’t.
He perceived an evil, and sought to destroy what he saw as a threat.
He was the evil. He murdered millions of human beings who were created in the image of God all because he wanted to use them as scapegoats to elevate himself into a savior figure.
He was blinded by hate and prejudice, but he meant well. He thought he was doing something good.
I agree he was blinded by hate and prejudice. But he had to know what he was doing was wrong. Even pagans have a conscience, and he was born in a Christian environment with access to Christian teaching. He was not ignorant of what God required of us–to love others.
Can you find a single statement made in this thread that was done without good intent?
Yes, the attempt to couch anti-Semitism as simply “asking questions” that some posters (not you) have done.
 
Last edited:
The latter is possible, but I am unconvinced
Hatred blinds people. When we seek to punish someone, we are blinded of their humanity; it happens without our realizing it, it is not deliberate. Jesus saw this when He said “forgive them, for they know not what they do”.

I cannot convince you, you would have to see that this is true in your own experience.
The former is absolutely wrong.
Hitler had the illusion that what he was destroying had no value or negative value. Yes, he was wrong. The people who hung Jesus had the same illusion. (Note: we are all capable of the same illusion)
 
Yes, Pope Francis says that God’s justice is mercy.

I did not deny the existence of hell. I agreed with Pope Francis that God condemns no one. Hell can remain a place where people choose to be away from God.

A person who believes that God condemns is more likely to have problems forgiving people. What this has to do with the topic is that antisemitism is a judgment, and we are called to forgive rather than judge. This does not preclude pointing out the harm of prejudice, though.
 
I do not think that it is antisemitic to point out that many in high places of Wall Street, Washington, Hollywood, and Silicon Valley are ethnic Jews. It’s merely a statement of fact.

Which begs the question: why do they have that amount of power and influence, given their share of the population?

Again, it is not out of hatred that I ask these questions. One does not even need to believe in a conspiracy theory (i.e. they are all working together) to think that one ethnicity has too much representation within society’s largest spheres of influence
I guess that basically urges the question ‘so what?’.

Ethnic Jews have different beliefs from one another. You have your orthodox jew (religion) and secular/liberal jew (culturally).

Does it really matter that they’re over represented? Why is too much representation bad? If they got there by their work or even connections…that’s life. This concern is not that different from left wing feminists being upset at how Wall Street has less women than men. But at least they can eventually find a case of sexism there tbh.

As for why they’re hated…we have typical religious hate (Christian and Muslims), and anti-semetic rhetoric that Hitler used. Aka that they’re controlling the wealth and hurting the rest.
 
You don’t get the benefit of the doubt when you keep stepping into the same controversy over and over again.
She’s “stepping into the controversy” because she sees injustice. She is seeing the same injustice that Christians in Palestine and our Catholic Bishops also see. Does stepping into a controversy make her antisemitic?
Ilhan Omar has been made aware numerous times that the way she talks about Israel and the pro-Israeli support in the US sounds anti-Semitic
Well, the JDL condemns her comments as antisemitic, but JVP is applauding her remarks.
makes use of anti-Semitic references.
This is according to some media outlets, but not others. When Ilhan said “Benjamin’s baby” I thought she was referring to Benjamin Netanyahu, and many others thought the same. The mistake was in that the “trope” is also used by people who promote hatred of Jews and the idea of a global Jewish conspiracy. The journalist she tweeted those words to, Glenn Greenwald, put in his own comments here:


Fact is: the truth hurts.
You can criticize AIPAC without using anti-Semitic slurs.
Yes, she needs to watch her words. Unfortunately, some words she uses seem fine, but they have been used differently in the past.
He was the evil. He murdered millions of human beings who were created in the image of God all because he wanted to use them as scapegoats to elevate himself into a savior figure.
When we point at any human and say “he is evil” we do the same as those who hung Jesus. (edit: we do not do the same, it is the same thing happening in our minds as those who hung Him). Dehumanization is a blindness. It is a natural blindness, but it does not represent truth. Jesus made reference to “the post in our own eye”. When we condemn others as “evil”, we have the post in our eye. Condemnation is the opposite of forgiveness.
I agree he was blinded by hate and prejudice. But he had to know what he was doing was wrong. Even pagans have a conscience, and he was born in a Christian environment with access to Christian teaching. He was not ignorant of what God required of us–to love others.
I’m glad we agree on something! 🙂

We are all capable of the same illusion. Whenever we condemn someone as “evil”, or having some negative value, then we are blind. The blindness warps our consciences.
“Anytime you have a negative feeling toward anyone, you’re living in an illusion. There’s something seriously wrong with you. You’re not seeing reality. Something inside of you has to change. But what do we generally do when we have a negative feeling? “He is to blame, she is to blame. She’s got to change.” No! The world’s all right. The one who has to change is you.”
― Anthony de Mello, Awareness
 
Last edited:
Yes, the attempt to couch anti-Semitism as simply “asking questions” that some posters (not you) have done.
The “good intent” there (note the scare quotes because the poster most probably has an illusion/blindness) is that they believe that they are promoting justice by calling attention to what they believe is injustice. It is well-intended, but coming from a position of blindness.

It is a tough pill to swallow that all of us are capable of such blindness. People throw the words around condemning this or that person as evil, and people, even Christians, think it is perfectly normal. Well, it is normal, but it is not Christian. Calling a person “evil” is the worst of condemnation/judging someone, and Jesus call us not to judge.

There is one comment that Ilhan made that truly shows a blindness, and the press did not capitalize enough on it. She made an off-the-cuff remark about Donald Trump, suggesting that he was “not human”. Our president is every bit as human as you and I, but resentment and hatred blind people, Ilhan included. All of us are subject to this blindness. Donald Trump always intends well.
 
I hope you come to see that the image of God presented in Pope Francis’ theology is not “bad” or “nonsensical” if that is what you were implying.

Yes, we are called to baptize, but that calling involves approaching people with merciful, accepting hearts, not judgmental hearts, which I am pretty sure you agree with.

I wish you well, (name removed by moderator)! Please join me in praying for an end to all prejudice.
 
Does stepping into a controversy make her antisemitic?
The controversy she keeps stepping into is saying anti-Semitic stuff. It’s one thing if she thoughtfully critiques Israel’s policies with facts and reasons. What people of good will don’t like is when she uses anti-Semitic slurs again and again after being called out again and again. That is the controversy she keeps stepping into.
When we point at any human and say “he is evil” we do the same as those who hung Jesus.
No, we don’t. There is objective evil in this world, and humans are not immune from it. As free moral agents, we can choose to let it devour us or we can turn from it and towards the good, with the help of God.
Dehumanization is a blindness. It is a natural blindness, but it does not represent truth.
Calling someone whose actions are objectively evil (like committing genocide) an evil person is not dehumanization. What is dehumanizing is the killing of millions of people for the stated reason that they are subhuman. That’s dehumanization and it is evil. Hitler was evil.
Jesus made reference to “the post in our own eye”. When we condemn others as “evil”, we have the post in our eye.
Jesus also said, “You will know them by their fruits” (Matthew 7:16).
Condemnation is the opposite of forgiveness.
It is not my place to forgive Hitler. Forgiveness is something we must receive from God and those we have wronged.
 
All people have good intentions.
No, they don’t. And if you believe that, then you don’t understand human nature.
Even Hitler meant well. He perceived an evil, and sought to destroy what he saw as a threat. He was blinded by hate and prejudice, but he meant well. He thought he was doing something good.
Are you saying the Hitler perceived an evil? Or that he perceived what he thought was an evil?

The latter is possible, but I am unconvinced. The former is absolutely wrong.
OneSheep is right and I am surprised that anyone is arguing about it. Hitler and the German people correctly perceived evil in the way Germany was punished after World War I (Treaty of Versailles).

I think maybe it was Augustine who said (and he probably wasn’t the first to say it) that when people do evil, they do it for some perceived good. Why else would they do it?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top