What should Luther have done?

  • Thread starter Thread starter carol_marie
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
40.png
ahimsaman72:
This is one perfect example of why I haven’t entered the roman catholic church. Dreadful, absolutely dreadful commentary unfit for a Christian forum. The only person I want to see and ask if I can enter in is Jesus Christ, the Son of God, not one of his apostles. You do the faith a terrible disservice, “sir”.
Please don’t judge the Catholic Church by the behavior of some of it’s members. Remember, the Church is not so much a hotel for saints as it is a hospital for sinners, and some of us have farther to go before we are “cured.” As someone said in a post on another thread,you should judge an organization on its best members, not it’s worst. 👋
 
40.png
RNRobert:
Please don’t judge the Catholic Church by the behavior of some of it’s members. Remember, the Church is not so much a hotel for saints as it is a hospital for sinners, and some of us have farther to go before we are “cured.” As someone said in a post on another thread,you should judge an organization on its best members, not it’s worst. 👋
Thank you Robert. I must have been neededing that. I keep forgetting I am the worst. 🙂
 
40.png
RNRobert:
Please don’t judge the Catholic Church by the behavior of some of it’s members. Remember, the Church is not so much a hotel for saints as it is a hospital for sinners, and some of us have farther to go before we are “cured.” As someone said in a post on another thread,you should judge an organization on its best members, not it’s worst. 👋
I love the statement,

I would never join an organization that would have me as its member.
 
40.png
RNRobert:
Please don’t judge the Catholic Church by the behavior of some of it’s members. Remember, the Church is not so much a hotel for saints as it is a hospital for sinners, and some of us have farther to go before we are “cured.” As someone said in a post on another thread,you should judge an organization on its best members, not it’s worst. 👋
Trust me, I’m far from being a model Christian. Maccabees’ sentiments I have found indicative of not a few lay Catholics and higher up. I’m not so upset at Maccabees, but in his theology behind his post in which he used it to defame a dead man. This is one of the many, many issues I haven’t resolved in dealing with Catholicism.

I don’t judge the whole catholic church by his behavior. It’s one piece of the whole. His post was simply one of many perfect examples of problems I have found with Catholicism.
 
I don’t judge the whole catholic church by his behavior. It’s one piece of the whole. His post was simply one of many perfect examples of problems I have found with Catholicism.

I am a lady and not a he. Also I am a slave to our Holy Mother. After reading several of your posts ahimsaman, I feel blessed and not at all surprised I fell short of your standards.
 
40.png
ahimsaman72:
It was a callous, slanderous statement which 1) attempts to belittle a dead man and
Because it claims he didn’t believe in purgatory, because he used the term “dammit” or because his name was misspelled in the joke?

If it’s the first one, then I think the Catholic belief is well known and I assume so is the Lutheran belief. If it’s because of the “dammit” perhaps we should substitute “oh, no.” If it’s because his name was misspelled, then cut the poster some slack.

Now, if it’s just because the punch line was poorly constructed and it wasn’t all that funny, then it was because of the joke itself and not because of its attempt to belittle Luther.
2)assumes that dead man’s fate (which is something the Catholic church doesn’t even do). Considering the statements made above this “joke”, I wouldn’t call it much of joke, but a slander of a man’s character.
The Catholic Church assumes dead people’s fates all the time. They are called Saints. Some people (myself perhaps included) think that can be pretty presumptuous, but certainly not made to slander or belittle.

In the joke, Luther made it to heaven, right? (At least he would get in after the waiting period if you believe the Catholic teachings.) Does that differ from your idea of the fate of Luther?

You don’t have to think the joke is funny, but slanderous?

Alan
 
40.png
Maccabees:
I just picture Luther going to the pearly gates where he meets guess who Saint Peter. He ask well you have the keys am I in or not? WEll you were going to hell but since you prayed your rosary Mary put a good word in for you so you barely made it out of there but your not going to heaven for awhile either.
Lutehr says well there is no where else so what am I going to do wait on these steps outside of the gate until the end of the world.
Saint Pete says yes this is your purgatory.
Luterh says dammit I thought this place didn’t exist.
Saint Pete says well you should of asked the Pope he would have told you better.
It seems here that a litteral interpretation has messed up a good joke.
  1. There are no pearly gates
  2. St Peter does not stand there
  3. Passing a test at the door (question/answers) will not get you into heaven.
The basis of the joke is that Luther did not believe in Purgatory, the Church teaches that nothing unclean can enter heaven, so for us imperfect humans, we need a place to clean up before we enter.

The point of the Joke is that there are TRUTHS and your belief does not effect the TRUTH. So saying ‘I don’t believe in God’ does not free you from responsibility to live a Christian Life. Saying ‘I don’t believe in purgatory’ does not effect the existence of purgatory.

There is no judgment of the salvation of ML, only a witty way of pointing out that he may not have been perfect.

Even the joke admits him into heaven. For his salvation is assured if he finds himself in purgatory.
 
40.png
tru_dvotion:
I am a lady and not a he. Also I am a slave to our Holy Mother. After reading several of your posts ahimsaman, I feel blessed and not at all surprised I fell short of your standards.
I wasn’t referring to you, but to Maccabees. I am a slave to Jesus Christ, I recommend you be a slave to him also.
 
40.png
AlanFromWichita:
Because it claims he didn’t believe in purgatory, because he used the term “dammit” or because his name was misspelled in the joke?

If it’s the first one, then I think the Catholic belief is well known and I assume so is the Lutheran belief. If it’s because of the “dammit” perhaps we should substitute “oh, no.” If it’s because his name was misspelled, then cut the poster some slack.

Now, if it’s just because the punch line was poorly constructed and it wasn’t all that funny, then it was because of the joke itself and not because of its attempt to belittle Luther.
The Catholic Church assumes dead people’s fates all the time. They are called Saints. Some people (myself perhaps included) think that can be pretty presumptuous, but certainly not made to slander or belittle.

In the joke, Luther made it to heaven, right? (At least he would get in after the waiting period if you believe the Catholic teachings.) Does that differ from your idea of the fate of Luther?

You don’t have to think the joke is funny, but slanderous?

Alan
Alan, I would ask you one question - does the joke make Luther look like a fool? yes, it does. It was a judgement on his character as the previous comments above the joke indicate. Read the whole thing.

I don’t know Luther’s fate, neither does Maccabees, you or me. That’s in GOD’S hands.

The joke was an attempt to support the papal office at the expense of a dead man who can’t defend himself. That is slanderous and frankly not funny.
 
40.png
ahimsaman72:
I wasn’t referring to you, but to Maccabees. I am a slave to Jesus Christ, I recommend you be a slave to him also.
If she is a slave to our spiritual mother, you can rest assured she is already a slave to her divine Son!
 
40.png
MichaelTDoyle:
If she is a slave to our spiritual mother, you can rest assured she is already a slave to her divine Son!
This is one of the teachings I cannot accept, I must be honest here. Are you saying that we must go through the Holy Mother to get to her Son? If that’s your take on this, then I cannot accept that. I admire Mother Mary and appreciate all she has done.

One of the big things that has kept me away from converting is the idea of Mary as Co-Redemptrix. I believe it is false and degenerates into Mary worship.

I mean no disrespect to you or her (tru devotion) or the Holy Mother, but I have to be honest about this belief.

If I am assuming too much in your post, please forgive me.
 
We are actually getting far off topic at this point. I suggest the topic go back to, “What should Luther have done?” to which my answer is simply - hindsight is 20/20. We can sit and talk and explore all the options but it won’t change anything. Both sides arguably made some mistakes.
 
ahimsaman72 said:
please fill me in on what you are talking about…

I would direct you to explore the writings of St. Louis de Monfort. Before you would look into the devotion I follow, I would suggest you immerse yourself in Mariology. What I follow would be utterly useless to you at this point in your faith life. I say this with love and without malice, please believe me. About being slave to Christ, I love him, no… I am in love with him, have no fear on that account.
 
40.png
tru_dvotion:
I would direct you to explore the writings of St. Louis de Monfort. Before you would look into the devotion I follow, I would suggest you immerse yourself in Mariology. What I follow would be utterly useless to you at this point in your faith life. I say this with love and without malice, please believe me. About being slave to Christ, I love him, no… I am in love with him, have no fear on that account.
Frankly, I have no interest in Mariology. I agree that at this point in my faith life it would be utterly useless. Does it have to be useful in my faith life? I am glad to hear of your love for Christ. After all, he is your Redeemer. I say this with love and without malice, believe me.

Do you believe Mother Mary is Co-Redemptrix with Christ?
 
to ahimsaman72

ITs a joke. This is not to represent a literal theology. You will see this scenario in cartoons all the time. Do you take those cartoons literally. Its hyberbole is over the top.
I have read Luther’s rant’s he has said far worse things about Catholics and Jews he accursed both of us. And he wasn’t joking.:mad:

At least in my joke he makes it into heaven. For a guy who takes everything so seriously you should read the slander of Luther for yourself and not rely upon the saint Luther scenario you have in your head.

Look I have no idea if Luther made it into heaven or hell or made a trip to purgatory this is not to be taken literally so lighten up or else you will end up like Luther an uptight anti-catholic.
 
40.png
ahimsaman72:
Do you believe Mother Mary is Co-Redemptrix with Christ?
Mary as co-redemptrix is a doctrine not a dogma. When explaining this term to your friend, make sure he understands that the Church does not teach (never has and never will) that Mary as co-redemptrix is equal to Christ. “Co” is from the Latin “cum,“ meaning “with”. “Trix” is a feminine suffix, so the word means “the woman with the redeemer”—the woman with the one doing the act of redemption.

Source : forums.catholic-questions.org/showthread.php?t=2725&highlight=co-redemptrix
 
40.png
Maccabees:
to ahimsaman72

ITs a joke. This is not to represent a literal theology. You will see this scenario in cartoons all the time. Do you take those cartoons literally. Its hyberbole is over the top.
I have read Luther’s rant’s he has said far worse things about Catholics and Jews he accursed both of us. And he wasn’t joking.:mad:

At least in my joke he makes it into heaven. For a guy who takes everything so seriously you should read the slander of Luther for yourself and not rely upon the saint Luther scenario you have in your head.

Look I have no idea if Luther made it into heaven or hell or made a trip to purgatory this is not to be taken literally so lighten up or else you will end up like Luther an uptight anti-catholic.
lighten up is a common phrase around here. Like I already mentioned before, salvation is serious. I have no humor in that regard. as for Luther’s comments - I don’t defend them. Neither do I wish to make him look like a fool.

it was a joke at his expense in direct relation to your post about the papal office and was clearly written to emphasize your views on papal succession. It was poor taste.
 
Sarah Jane:
Mary as co-redemptrix is a doctrine not a dogma. When explaining this term to your friend, make sure he understands that the Church does not teach (never has and never will) that Mary as co-redemptrix is equal to Christ. “Co” is from the Latin “cum,“ meaning “with”. “Trix” is a feminine suffix, so the word means “the woman with the redeemer”—the woman with the one doing the act of redemption.

Source : forums.catholic-questions.org/showthread.php?t=2725&highlight=co-redemptrix
I have read from another catholic website that bishops around the world and lay people have written to Pope JP11 to have it infallibly taught as true. Yes, eventually Mary will be taught as co-redemptrix.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top