Y
YADA
Guest
There may be DNA related susceptibility to CODID-19
And Blood type
And Blood type
That’s wrong thinking. You don’t wear a mask to protect yourself. You wear a mask to protect others from you.People assess their own risk and respond accordingly.
He does when he says that people wear them because they don’t like him.He doesn’t denigrate people who wear them.
I listen to what public health experts are saying. They say covid is responsible for the spike in hospitalizations.Do you have the data that shows the percent of new hospitalizations related to covid as compared to non-covid reasons?
The government already pays for care and medical needs for children who are from poor families.Once the gov’t is paying for everything pre-natal, birth and delivery, then they will want the first year covered and so on. Before we know it, we are marching towards gov’t run healthcare for all.
Men who are not responsible enough to abstain from sex with a woman that they are not married (or even engaged to) are not likely to be responsible enough to hold down a job and use whatever money they earn to pay for medical expenses for a woman.Are there any men in your scenarios? Why aren’t men responsible for this care?
Yes, I agree.It has to be in a family setting.
Oh, I know the whole “My mask protects you and your mask protects me” mantra. I wear a mask to increase my personal protection. Studies have shown that surgical masks offer 67% protection for healthcare workers in preventing infection in healthcare settings. I have both cloth masks and surgical masks. I use a cloth mask if I don’t have any surgical masks figuring they are most likely less than 67% protection but more than nothing. Healthcare workers need them to protect themselves AND to protect patients so I don’t really get why they stress that a mask is not personal protection. My guess is that if they do say “your mask protects you and others,” it will give people a false sense of security and then they are less likely to observe distancing and hand-washing which would erase any whatever little boost wearing one may give. I don’t expect or want to depend on other persons decisions to wear a mask to protect me even though I appreciate it if they do. I see my protection of myself as my responsibility.That’s wrong thinking. You don’t wear a mask to protect yourself. You wear a mask to protect others from you.
Well of course in a place that Covid cases are spiking there will also be a corresponding spike in Covid hospitalizations. No one is arguing that. The issue is that you corrected my use of the word partly in reference to covid being the reason for a spike in hospitalizations by saying covid is mostly the result of new hospitalizations. Do you have data that most new hospitalizations are due to Covid?I listen to what public health experts are saying. They say covid is responsible for the spike in hospitalizations.
Not exactly how you figure that the 75% were better off than before. My mother and father lived through the depression. If folks were better off, it wouldn’t have been called the Great Depression. They would not be called the Greatest Generation.I think of it the other way, if you don’t mind. My grandfather who lived through the Depression said that “…yes, 25% of the population was unemployed. But that meant 75% was employed. And that 75% were sometimes better off than they had been before.” Not a moral judgment, just an observation.
As a matter of fact, there are a lot of people who are better off now than they were before Covid
I was merely showing that there is information that offers a DNA connection to COVID-19 and a Blood type connection which while perhaps is not DNA is an inherited trait and not what she claimed in her post … No where is wearing a mask - pro or con - a part of my post…There is no genetic predisposition to covid-19. None. Nada. Zip.
There are explanations offered for the statistics, and they have nothing to do with genetics. They have to do with food insecurity, economic disparities, environmental injustice, types of jobs they work, etc.
I can understand this. I think that something like the Finnish system would work–their health care is free and it is very very good, but they are also able to buy into “better plans” if they wish and if they have the income/resources. However, it seems like most regular folks (which I consider myself and my family) would be happy with the “regular health care plan.”This sounds good in theory but if the government has to pay these expenses for each and every woman, then the government and not the woman, will decide the standard of care. I’m not sure I would be comfortable with that.
During my week off a few weeks ago, I spent a lot of time watching documentaries on the Great Depression and the Dust Bowl (which coincided–bummer, right!?)Not exactly how you figure that the 75% were better off than before. My mother and father lived through the depression. If folks were better off, it wouldn’t have been called the Great Depression. They would not be called the Greatest Generation.
You might just do some reading on the depression or talk to some of the few people who are still alive who lived through it.
This is where the Democrats keep getting it wrong.Unfortunately, he realized that by holding the carrot of being somewhat anti abortion in front of Americans, a large number of them would simply follow blindly.
I don’t think anyone here said that. I said 75% were employed and SOME of them were better off than before. If, say, you worked for the government, your salary stayed the same, but prices plummeted. If you looked at old mortgage records for the period, it would jump out at you how far prices dropped.But to claim 75% of the people during the depression were better off is nonsense.
Do you really not see that you are sneering contemptuously with these words?The Democrats have to realize how their radical agenda and sneering contempt for anybody who disagrees with them (or for that matter, anybody who didn’t go to college and who works with their hands and goes to Church and actually believes in Christianity) is a major turn off.