Why do Protestants become Catholic?

  • Thread starter Thread starter figuredeslarmes
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
40.png
sadie2723:
Amen. And, let’s not forget that the doctrine of Once Saved Always Saved, which is what we are talking about here, did not come into being until Martin (I can commit Adultry 100 times a day and still be saved ) Luther came up with it in the 1500’s.
Let’s also not forget that he’s made statements that imply God doesn’t really have the power to sanctify us - something like “snow-covered heaps of dung.” Underneath, we’re still dung, so give up all hope of holiness. What a dim view of the power of our Lord!
 
40.png
djrakowski:
Folks normally learn the faith by going to some sort of catechetical training - sort-of like Sunday school for Catholic youth. For adults, there’s the yearlong RCIA process in which the beliefs of the faith are explained.
Yes, Confraternity of Christian Doctrine. I’m very familiar with it. Taught primarily to kids, taking them up all the way to confirmation. Is that rt?
40.png
djrakowski:
You also misunderstand why we gather for worship. We have the Real Presence of Christ in the Eucharist.
How did I misunderstand that?
40.png
djrakowski:
There is nothing on earth that makes it clear that Jesus died to pay for our sins in full than what happens every time the Mass is celebrated.
Actually, the human voice can make it perfectly clear to those sitting in the pew who don’t know about salvation. Communion, or the Eucharist can’t do that.
 
Actually, the human voice can make it perfectly clear to those sitting in the pew who don’t know about salvation. Communion, or the Eucharist can’t do that.

Spoken like a person that has not yet experienced it. I can tell you that the presence of the Lord can work wonders you cannot imagine. I have seen it. I have experienced it.
 
40.png
believers:
Yes, Confraternity of Christian Doctrine. I’m very familiar with it. Taught primarily to kids, taking them up all the way to confirmation. Is that rt?
Yes, that’s right!
How did I misunderstand that?
Read John 6, and then compare it to the purpose of your worship gatherings.
Actually, the human voice can make it perfectly clear to those sitting in the pew who don’t know about salvation. Communion, or the Eucharist can’t do that.
Then I will place extra emphasis on you taking the effort to go out and learn about the Eucharist. The human voice can make it clear (as in CCD and RCIA classes), and still, the broken body of Our Lord makes it even more clear.

If you’re sitting in church, and the sermons are all you ever hear about the Lord and ‘getting saved,’ how do you know that what you’re hearing is right? You have to somehow know that the minister who’s speaking is obeying 2 Timothy 2:15 and correctly handling the word of truth. How can you ensure that to be the case when another minister in a church down the street from yours, equally assured that what he’s preaching is coming from the word of God and preaching something completely different than what you’re hearing?
 
40.png
djrakowski:
You’re on VERY dangerous ground when you claim to know, with such certainty, the state of an individual’s salvation.
When someone cannot say that Jesus is Lord and Savior with certainty, their faith is dangerous.
40.png
djrakowski:
You greatly, greatly misunderstand how salvation works. I’m guessing you’re placing emphasis on the moment you “receive Christ as your personal Lord and Savior” and thus have your fate sealed for all eternity, regardless of the sins you commit after that moment?
You’ve got half of that right. I believe Christ to be my Lord and Savior AND obey His teachings especially His greatest commandment which basically states to “love God and love one another.”
40.png
djrakowski:
Simply because you don’t understand the Catholic Church’s means of communicating the message of salvation doesn’t mean it isn’t being communicated. You need to learn more about what and how the Church really teaches before you make such broad, sweeping statements that essentially condemn most of us Catholics (and near Catholics like me) to hell.
On the contrary, I know it very well. I was Catholic for 36 years. I come from a long line of Catholics. How exactly can I condemn you to hell? No can do that but yourself. Someone just said there are pew warmers. I guess they’ll just remain that way, rt? Is that ok with you? While some of my own family members attend church every Sunday and leave without the knowledge of salvation, who do I need to talk to so say they will hear the message. How many years of pew warming will they have to do before someone informs them of salvation.
 
40.png
believers:
When someone cannot say that Jesus is Lord and Savior with certainty, their faith is dangerous.

I agree with that one.

You’ve got half of that right. I believe Christ to be my Lord and Savior AND obey His teachings especially His greatest commandment which basically states to “love God and love one another.”

Then you agree with the Catholic faith on that.

On the contrary, I know it very well. I was Catholic for 36 years. I come from a long line of Catholics. How exactly can I condemn you to hell? No can do that but yourself. Someone just said there are pew warmers. I guess they’ll just remain that way, rt? Is that ok with you? While some of my own family members attend church every Sunday and leave without the knowledge of salvation, who do need to talk to so say they will hear the message. How many years of pew warming will they have to do before someone informs them of salvation.
I guess the only thing that I can say to you there is that I am sorry your family members are not listening…cause we teach it every week. :hmmm:
 
40.png
believers:
But don’t you see how this is not working for so many that are unsaved? How is anyone to know that to truly know about salvation, you’re going to have to attend Bible study? Isn’t spreading the good news about salvation also a form of worship and should be practiced during mass. Most Catholics I know don’t go to Bible study or read the Bible. Sunday is all they have. It wouldn’t take but a few minutes. At the very end, the priest asks for prayers and also gives news or announcements. Why not include the news of salvation?
Uh, we do.

You’re making a grave and disengenuous mistake by assuming that pew sitters aren’t saved. You have no idea where they are on their spiritual journey, and merely attending a Bible study doesn’t guarantee anything. If the pew sitters are in a state of grace, and they die in that state, they’ll be saved. I actually worry more for the people who believe that a magical “acceptance prayer” is their get-into-Heaven-free card. After they believe they’ve said the magic words, despite a bunch of double-talk, they shut down because that’s all they have to do. No responding to grace, no continual REAL repentence. Their ability to even reconsider is seriously atrophied, and then they become smug and self-secure just before their ultmate fall.

You clearly don’t understand things like sacraments, so I can see where your misunderstanding of Mass comes from. But I’m sorry, the Church isn’t going to set aside the holiest, most grace-filled activity in the worship life of a Christian in order to cater to the lowest-common-denominator–the person who can’t be bothered to get off the couch and LEARN.
 
40.png
believers:
When someone cannot say that Jesus is Lord and Savior with certainty, their faith is dangerous.
Except that the concept of eternal secutiry is entirely un-Biblical. And, you missed my point - you were saying that YOU know whether someone is saved, which is something that is only in the knowledge of God. I don’t think you want to raise yourself to that level (I know I don’t!)
You’ve got half of that right. I believe Christ to be my Lord and Savior AND obey His teachings especially His greatest commandment which basically states to “love God and love one another.”
Do you obey his other teachings, such as the necessity of baptism? Or the Eucharist? Read John 6 again, sincerely, and look at the emphasis Jesus places on receiving Him in the Eucharist.

Again, this bears repeating. How do you know that the doctrines taught by your pastor, when different from the pastor down the street, which are different from the pastor across town, are correct?
On the contrary, I know it very well. I was Catholic for 36 years. I come from a long line of Catholics. How exactly can I condemn you to hell? No can do that but yourself. Someone just said there are pew warmers. I guess they’ll just remain that way, rt? Is that ok with you? While some of my own family members attend church every Sunday and leave without the knowledge of salvation, who do I need to talk to so say they will hear the message. How many years of pew warming will they have to do before someone informs them of salvation.
Well, I’ll quote you where you condemned us to hell:
But don’t you see how this is not working for so many that are unsaved?
That means that you have decided, through what you can gather from observing and listening to your friends and family, that you can tell if they’re saved. Again, I say you’re coming awfully close to placing yourself in God’s shoes, and that’s not where I’d want to be!
 
But believers, you are missing a very important point.

Protestants who become Catholic understand that Christ paid for our sins. AND THEY BECOME CATHOLIC.

But Catholics who leave the Catholic church never understood that in the first place.

Clearly the Catholic Church contains that truth. Those who leave just are not listening.

How Do Catholics Hear the Gospel

God Bless,
Maria
 
40.png
djrakowski:
Except that the concept of eternal secutiry is entirely un-Biblical. And, you missed my point - you were saying that YOU know whether someone is saved, which is something that is only in the knowledge of God. I don’t think you want to raise yourself to that level (I know I don’t!)
Do you obey his other teachings, such as the necessity of baptism? Or the Eucharist? Read John 6 again, sincerely, and look at the emphasis Jesus places on receiving Him in the Eucharist.

Again, this bears repeating. How do you know that the doctrines taught by your pastor, when different from the pastor down the street, which are different from the pastor across town, are correct?
Well, I’ll quote you where you condemned us to hell:

That means that you have decided, through what you can gather from observing and listening to your friends and family, that you can tell if they’re saved. Again, I say you’re coming awfully close to placing yourself in God’s shoes, and that’s not where I’d want to be!
My girlfriend’s Dad does this. He thinks he has a total lock on if a person is going to heaven or hell based on a few questions that he often asks. And, if you get one of those questions wrong, or answer in a way that is not totally in line with what he and his Fundamentalist buddies think…well you are just damned to hell.

Of course, like I have pointed out time and again, his areguements never hold water in the light of scripture. And, that frustrates the heck out of him. This is why he has essentially quit talking about religion with me all together with the exception of the times he wants to take the odd shot at Rome.
 
40.png
montanaman:
You clearly don’t understand things like sacraments, so I can see where your misunderstanding of Mass comes from. But I’m sorry, the Church isn’t going to set aside the holiest, most grace-filled activity in the worship life of a Christian in order to cater to the lowest-common-denominator–the person who can’t be bothered to get off the couch and LEARN.
Who am I to just jump in here, but there are time when I think believers has a point. I mean, I have been studying studying studying trying to understand what is taking place in the Mass. And until I got a hold of We Worship A guide to the Catholic Mass, I had no clue what exactly was taking place. And to be honest, I am still having trouble with it. So unless you are taught well, I could see some problems with people fully comprehending the Mass. I think we all have to admit, there was a huge problem in the past with people being adequately catechised. Seriously, if every Catholic truly understood what was taking place at Mass, then all those that only show up for Easter and Christmas, wouldn’t dare miss any other Sunday. (But since they do, isn’t if fair to say, they are missing something… maybe that something is getting “off the couch and [learning]” But they obviously don’t understand the Mass to the extent that they should)

I am not saying the Mass needs to be changed, but maybe something needs to be changed somewhere, for all those who aren’t getting the message from the Mass, and for all those that are too lazy to get up off the couch and learn.

Just my thoughts,

RyanL’s Wife
 
40.png
believers:
Jesus paid the price for our salvation IN FULL. In other words, there’s nothing more we can do as Christians but to believe and obey.
This is where you speak the Truth but don’t fully understand it yet. BELIEVE AND OBEY. Only you can’t just turn around and decide what you must obey, only the commandments about love because it sounds good. You either take Christ at his word, all of it, or you make up your own way. When he commands us to obey Him in ALL THINGS, he means it, he’s not just passing time talking gibberish. To love God means to take him seriously in everything he said *and * commanded, offering him your obedience, otherwise you are fooling not only yourself, but all those you have influence over, and that is a scary situation for you.

And we know that Christ said NARROW IS THE WAY, and few there are that find it. It wasn’t the easy way, it was the road less traveled.
 
RyanL's Wife:
Who am I to just jump in here, but there are time when I think believers has a point. I mean, I have been studying studying studying trying to understand what is taking place in the Mass. And until I got a hold of We Worship A guide to the Catholic Mass, I had no clue what exactly was taking place. And to be honest, I am still having trouble with it. So unless you are taught well, I could see some problems with people fully comprehending the Mass. I think we all have to admit, there was a huge problem in the past with people being adequately catechised. Seriously, if every Catholic truly understood what was taking place at Mass, then all those that only show up for Easter and Christmas, wouldn’t dare miss any other Sunday. (But since they do, isn’t if fair to say, they are missing something… maybe that something is getting “off the couch and [learning]” But they obviously don’t understand the Mass to the extent that they should)

I am not saying the Mass needs to be changed, but maybe something needs to be changed somewhere, for all those who aren’t getting the message from the Mass, and for all those that are too lazy to get up off the couch and learn.

Just my thoughts,

RyanL’s Wife
Yes indeed the Mass is forever mysterious…I don’t think a single person since the Last Supper fully exhausted all aspects of the Mass…that is the beauty of it isn’t it? It’s a mystery yet there are many shafts of illumination that guides us through. The physical manifestation of the invisible and absolute mystery that is God.

in XT.
 
RyanL's Wife:
Who am I to just jump in here, but there are time when I think believers has a point. I mean, I have been studying studying studying trying to understand what is taking place in the Mass. And until I got a hold of We Worship A guide to the Catholic Mass, I had no clue what exactly was taking place. And to be honest, I am still having trouble with it. So unless you are taught well, I could see some problems with people fully comprehending the Mass. I think we all have to admit, there was a huge problem in the past with people being adequately catechised. Seriously, if every Catholic truly understood what was taking place at Mass, then all those that only show up for Easter and Christmas, wouldn’t dare miss any other Sunday. (But since they do, isn’t if fair to say, they are missing something… maybe that something is getting “off the couch and [learning]” But they obviously don’t understand the Mass to the extent that they should)

I am not saying the Mass needs to be changed, but maybe something needs to be changed somewhere, for all those who aren’t getting the message from the Mass, and for all those that are too lazy to get up off the couch and learn.

Just my thoughts,

RyanL’s Wife
Okay, I grudgingly admit he has a point–but it’s about something I’ve been saying for decades now. Catholics need to learn their faith. Mass is a good place for that because you also get the added benefit of the Sacrament while you learn (if the homily is good). But Believers fundamentally misunderstands the Mass and thinks it’s a bunch of ritualistic hooey. In his “faith tradition” church is a place to go to “get fed” or “study the Bible” or whatever. Those are fine things, but they don’t even compare to the Mass.
 
40.png
montanaman:
Okay, I grudgingly admit he has a point–but it’s about something I’ve been saying for decades now. Catholics need to learn their faith. Mass is a good place for that because you also get the added benefit of the Sacrament while you learn (if the homily is good). But Believers fundamentally misunderstands the Mass and thinks it’s a bunch of ritualistic hooey. In his “faith tradition” church is a place to go to “get fed” or “study the Bible” or whatever. Those are fine things, but they don’t even compare to the Mass.
Sir, it is YOU that have the point. I agree with you 100%. I think that Catholics do need to learn their faith. I also think that with that study, they need to learn to defend it. This is one of the reasons that I am so big on study on your own. It is also one of the reasons that I am starting an apologetics group at my parish!

Hang in there brother…we will turn this around. 😃
 
40.png
sadie2723:
Hey gang. Here is a thought that I have, and one that I have been thinking about for a while. Do you think that one of the reasons that people do not convert is that they view democracy and Catholicism as being polar opposites?

Here is where I am going with this. I think that there is a reason that there are like 30,000 protestant denominations out there, and I think that the reason is democracy. You get a group of people together of common interest, and you do your own thing. It grows in membership, but at a certain point groups form and splinter into other groups. This is the nature of democracy to some degree…that we all have a voice and that the majority decides everything.

Contrast that to the Church of Rome in which there is one leader (the Pope) with total authority in teaching. So, if you do not like a particular teaching, you have no choice but to leave the entire thing, as it does not matter how many people disagree with him…he is still right.

I have often thought that the democratic point of view might be holding things up for us.

Oh, and by the way, when reading this, do not get the impression that I am somehow anti-democracy. Nothing could be further from the truth. I just think that democracy has its place, and that place is not in determining church teaching.
Sadie2723 -

I’m going to take you up on this topic because it’s one I have been chewing on myself over the last 6 months or so. It was part of the lightbulb that went off in my head when I had to grapple with why as Evangelicals we were always opposed with the idea of a Pope and with venom I might add.

And after reading Church history and seeing how the Reformation and the Revolutions of Europe were so startlingly close in time frame, it was pretty obvious to me that the spirit of rebellion was rampant in all parts of the culture. Was this a coincidence? And does this rebellion or revulsion against any form of central authority have anything to do with the hatred toward Catholicism in general and the Pope specifically? This forced me to look at things from a different perspective and ask some really hard questions. I even voiced these questions to some family members and friends, and it was like I had blasphemed the high heavens! And yet, no one could argue with the timing of these things or the apparent knee-jerk reaction when confronted with Church Authority. And yet, kingdoms are based on authority, right? And aren’t we as Christians part of a kingdom, and wouldn’t that kingdom be based on all known patterns of kingdoms which were the form of government prescribed by God for both the Israelites and the New Kingdom of Christ?

Hmmm, makes you wonder? :hmmm:
 
Jeanette L:
Sadie2723 -

I’m going to take you up on this topic because it’s one I have been chewing on myself over the last 6 months or so. It was part of the lightbulb that went off in my head when I had to grapple with why as Evangelicals we were always opposed with the idea of a Pope and with venom I might add.

And after reading Church history and seeing how the Reformation and the Revolutions of Europe were so startlingly close in time frame, it was pretty obvious to me that the spirit of rebellion was rampant in all parts of the culture. Was this a coincidence? And does this rebellion or revulsion against any form of central authority have anything to do with the hatred toward Catholicism in general and the Pope specifically? This forced me to look at things from a different perspective and ask some really hard questions. I even voiced these questions to some family members and friends, and it was like I had blasphemed the high heavens! And yet, no one could argue with the timing of these things or the apparent knee-jerk reaction when confronted with Church Authority. And yet, kingdoms are based on authority, right? And aren’t we as Christians part of a kingdom, and wouldn’t that kingdom be based on all known patterns of kingdoms which were the form of government prescribed by God for both the Israelites and the New Kingdom of Christ?

Hmmm, makes you wonder? :hmmm:
Good points! I have often sat in the pew of Protestent contgregations, and occasionally do to this day, and I am struck by the way the Democracy rules many churchs out there. Twenty years ago, you could not find a curch out there that would have told you abortion was ok…now, you don’t have to look hard to find one. Same goes for things like stem cell research. It took me a little while to figure out why: The congregation is making the rules.

And, when you think about it, this is NOT the way we want things to go. Teaching should not bend because the general population thinks that it should. It has been written down for about 2000 years, and I have not seen God come back and edit the laws yet. Thus, I am going to stick with the church that does not bend to the will of the congregation on the basic rules of Jesus and his teaching.
 
40.png
sadie2723:
Good points! I have often sat in the pew of Protestent contgregations, and occasionally do to this day, and I am struck by the way the Democracy rules many churchs out there. Twenty years ago, you could not find a curch out there that would have told you abortion was ok…now, you don’t have to look hard to find one. Same goes for things like stem cell research. It took me a little while to figure out why: The congregation is making the rules.

And, when you think about it, this is NOT the way we want things to go. Teaching should not bend because the general population thinks that it should. It has been written down for about 2000 years, and I have not seen God come back and edit the laws yet. Thus, I am going to stick with the church that does not bend to the will of the congregation on the basic rules of Jesus and his teaching.
So in essence: Truth is not a democracy. It is an absolute benevolent dictatorship.

in XT.
 
I grew up near Wheaton College, Illinois, and went to a Bible Church (Fundamentalist) . For me, coming into the Catholic Church several years ago started when someone invited me to a Catholic Mass and there happened to be a baptism. The key aspects of water baptism and the invoking of In the Name of the Father, Son and Holy Spirit were very familiar to me but what the pastor said before and after had me pondering why Baptism, according to the pastor talking, “was the first and chief sacrament of forgiveness of sins” And why it was established as a channel of Our Lord’s Grace was a real puzzler to me. I then looked up the Statement of Faith of that denomination from my teenage years and found their view of Scripture – (ie, Scripture plus the Teaching Authority of the Evangelical Free Church) that Baptism was only an Ordinance and also that in no way should any effect of Baptism be considered as regeneration. As I compared that position to what Scripture and the Catholic Church teaches about Baptism, that’s what started it all for me.

And, I saw this on some other web sites but copied it from Dave Armstrong’s web site, which is socrates58.blogspot.com . It doesn’t go directly to your question, but perhaps it adds some perspective?

Says Dave Armstrong ~

Headline – Presbyterian Church Historian Mark Noll on Differences in Converts

This confirms something I have been contending for years. Dr. Mark Noll (of the Evangelical Presbyterian Church) has been on the Wheaton College faculty since 1979 and is the co-founder and present director of the Institute for the Study of American Evangelicals at Wheaton College. In recent years Dr. Noll has been a visiting teacher at Harvard Divinity School, University of Chicago Divinity School, Westminster Theological Seminary, and Regent College of Vancouver, B.C. His most recent book, co-authored with Carolyn Nystrom, is titled Is The Reformation Over? An Evangelical Assessment of Contemporary Roman Catholicism (Baker Academic, 2005).

The following exchange is from an interview by Carl E. Olson, on the Ignatius Insight blog:

IgnatiusInsight.com: Is The Reformation Over? contains a section about former notable Evangelicals (Scott and Kimberly Hahn, Thomas Howard, Peter Kreeft, etc.) who have become Catholic in recent years. Although they offer criticisms, they have a very ecumenical attitude toward Evangelicalism. Are there counterparts, so to speak, within Evangelicalism–former Catholics who became Evangelical because of serious theological reflection and who now engage in ecumenical dialogue with Catholics, either formally or informally?

Noll: I’m sure there must be, but most of the ex-Catholics I know or know about tend to be pretty severe on their Catholic past. Most ex-Catholic evangelicals of my acquaintance were not well catechized, and often their Catholic experience was nominal, mechanical, or (in some instances) abusive; by contrast, many ex-evangelical Catholics reasoned themselves into Catholicism from articulate evangelical positions. That difference helps explain the contrast in "ex"s (if, in fact, my experience speaks to a general situation).
Dennis E
40.png
figuredeslarmes:
I was wondering if you could tell me some of the major reasons why a Protestant, Evangelical, or Fundamentalist converts to the Roman Catholic Church. Thank you! 🙂
 
Jeanette,
Very well put!

Originally Posted by believers
Jesus paid the price for our salvation IN FULL. In other words, there’s nothing more we can do as Christians but to believe and obey.

May I add to believers that there are a number of places in the Catechism where your point is confirmed. For example, these paragraphs are a few points about ‘believe and obey’ (the numbers are footnotes with references to Scripture passages and Church documents) ~

The necessity of faith

161 Believing in Jesus Christ and in the One who sent him for our salvation is necessary for obtaining that salvation.42 "Since “without faith it is impossible to please [God]” and to attain to the fellowship of his sons, therefore without faith no one has ever attained justification, nor will anyone obtain eternal life ‘but he who endures to the end.’"43

Perseverance in faith

162 Faith is an entirely free gift that God makes to man. We can lose this priceless gift, as St. Paul indicated to St. Timothy: "Wage the good warfare, holding faith and a good conscience. By rejecting conscience, certain persons have made shipwreck of their faith."44 To live, grow and persevere in the faith until the end we must nourish it with the word of God; we must beg the Lord to increase our faith;45 it must be “working through charity,” abounding in hope, and rooted in the faith of the Church.46

Faith - the beginning of eternal life

163 Faith makes us taste in advance the light of the beatific vision, the goal of our journey here below. Then we shall see God “face to face”, “as he is”.47 So faith is already the beginning of eternal life:
Code:
When we contemplate the blessings of faith even now, as if gazing at a reflection in a mirror, it is as if we already possessed the wonderful things which our faith assures us we shall one day enjoy.48
164 Now, however, “we walk by faith, not by sight”;49 we perceive God as “in a mirror, dimly” and only “in part”.50 Even though enlightened by Him in whom it believes, faith is often lived in darkness and can be put to the test. The world we live in often seems very far from the one promised us by faith. Our experiences of evil and suffering, injustice and death, seem to contradict the Good News; they can shake our faith and become a temptation against it.

Dennis E
Jeanette L:
This is where you speak the Truth but don’t fully understand it yet. BELIEVE AND OBEY. Only you can’t just turn around and decide what you must obey, only the commandments about love because it sounds good. You either take Christ at his word, all of it, or you make up your own way. When he commands us to obey Him in ALL THINGS, he means it, he’s not just passing time talking gibberish. To love God means to take him seriously in everything he said *and * commanded, offering him your obedience, otherwise you are fooling not only yourself, but all those you have influence over, and that is a scary situation for you.

And we know that Christ said NARROW IS THE WAY, and few there are that find it. It wasn’t the easy way, it was the road less traveled.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top